Literature DB >> 20884698

Chronic kidney disease and risk of major cardiovascular disease and non-vascular mortality: prospective population based cohort study.

Emanuele Di Angelantonio1, Rajiv Chowdhury, Nadeem Sarwar, Thor Aspelund, John Danesh, Vilmundur Gudnason.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify associations of chronic kidney disease stages with major cardiovascular disease and non-vascular mortality in the general adult population.
DESIGN: Prospective population based cohort study.
SETTING: Reykjavik, Iceland. PARTICIPANTS: 16 958 people aged 33-81 years without manifest vascular disease and with available information on stage of chronic kidney disease (defined by both estimated glomerular filtration rate and urinary protein) at study entry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hazard ratios for time to major coronary heart disease outcomes and mortality.
RESULTS: 1210 (7%) of participants had chronic kidney disease at entry. During a median follow-up of 24 years, 4010 coronary heart disease outcomes, 559 deaths from stroke, and 3875 deaths from non-vascular causes were recorded. Compared with the reference group (estimated glomerular filtration rate 75-89 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and no proteinuria), people with lower renal function within the normal range of glomerular filtration rate did not have significantly higher risk of coronary heart disease. By contrast, in 1210 (7%) participants with chronic kidney disease at entry, hazard ratios for coronary heart disease, adjusted for several conventional cardiovascular risk factors, were 1.55 (95% confidence interval 1.02 to 2.35) for stage 1, 1.72 (1.30 to 2.24) for stage 2, 1.39 (1.22 to 1.58) for stage 3a, 1.90 (1.22 to 2.96) for stage 3b, and 4.29 (1.78 to 10.32) for stage 4. Information on chronic kidney disease increased discrimination and reclassification indices for coronary heart disease when added to conventional risk factors (P<0.01). The incremental gain provided by chronic kidney disease was lower than that provided by diabetes or smoking (C index increases of 0.0015, 0.0024, and 0.0124 respectively). Hazard ratios with chronic kidney disease were 0.97 (0.82 to 1.15) for cancer mortality and 1.26 (1.07 to 1.50) for other non-vascular mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: In people without manifest vascular disease, even the earliest stages of chronic kidney disease are associated with excess risk of subsequent coronary heart disease. Assessment of chronic kidney disease in addition to conventional risk factors modestly improves prediction of risk for coronary heart disease in this population. Further studies are needed to investigate associations between chronic kidney disease and non-vascular mortality from causes other than cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884698      PMCID: PMC2948649          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c4986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


Introduction

End stage renal failure is known to be associated with striking excesses of cardiovascular and all cause mortality.1 Strong associations have also been reported between non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease and such outcomes in patients with ischaemic cardiovascular diseases, heart failure, and high blood pressure.2 3 4 Such observations have led to recommendations by scientific and professional bodies that patients with manifest cardiovascular disease should be screened for evidence of kidney disease and that patients with chronic kidney disease should be regarded as at very high risk of coronary heart disease.5 6 In the general adult population, however, chronic kidney disease often goes undiagnosed because it is largely asymptomatic.7 Several population based prospective studies have reported on associations between renal function and vascular disease.8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 However, many such studies have lacked concomitant assessment of estimated glomerular filtration rate and urinary protein status or involved less than 10 years of follow-up (the time horizon used in most clinical cardiovascular risk scores), omitted measures of discrimination or reclassification of risk to help in judging the incremental predictive value of assessing chronic kidney disease, or involved some combination of these limitations. Hence, determining the potential value of assessment of chronic kidney disease in population-wide cardiovascular disease screening programmes, such as the National Health Service health check in the United Kingdom,16 has been difficult. We report on the incremental value of assessment of chronic kidney disease for prediction of risk for coronary heart disease in a population based prospective study of people without manifest vascular disease who have been monitored, on average, for almost a quarter of a century. To assist in interpretation, we have compared the predictive ability of chronic kidney disease with that of smoking and diabetes.

Methods

Participants, measurements, and end points

The Reykjavik study has been described in detail previously.17 Briefly, all men born between 1907 and 1934 and all women born between 1908 and 1935 who were resident in Reykjavik, Iceland, and its adjacent communities on 1 December 1966 were identified in the national population register and then invited to participate in the Reykjavik study during five stages of recruitment between 1967 and 1991, yielding a total of 9134 male and 9769 female participants (72% response rate). All participants gave informed consent. Nurses administered questionnaires, made physical measurements, recorded an electrocardiogram, and collected urine and fasting venous blood samples at baseline. Creatinine measurements were made at baseline within days of the initial examination by using the Jaffe method.18 Values of estimated glomerular filtration rate were calculated with the four variable modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD19) prediction equation and expressed as ml/min/1.73 m2 (with subsidiary analyses using estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated with the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI20) equation). Serum creatinine concentrations could not be recalibrated to the more accurate isotope dilution mass spectrometry standard. Presence of proteinuria was assessed at baseline with a urinary dipstick (Bayer Diagnostics Ames Multistix or Boehringer Mannheim Multistix). Results were considered positive if the dipstick test was 1+ or greater. Other analytes were measured by using standard methods, as described previously.21 As high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were available for only a small subset of participants, Framingham based models were not used. All participants have been monitored by central registries for occurrence of non-fatal myocardial infarction (on the basis of multinational monitoring of trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease (MONICA) or similar criteria) or coronary revascularisation (coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) until the end of 2005 and cause specific mortality (on the basis of a death certificate with international classification of diseases (ICD) codes) until the end of 2007.22 Loss to follow-up has been about 0.6% to date. Cause specific mortality was coded according to ICD-9 up to December 1996 and ICD-10 subsequently (web table A). Compared with a previous report in a subset of participants,23 this study used cohort-wide data on both estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria, as well as extended follow-up.

Statistical analysis

Principal analyses excluded participants with a history of cardiovascular disease at entry (defined as coronary heart disease, stroke, other heart diseases (such as angina or valvular disease), or coronary revascularisation) or known to be receiving renal replacement treatment. Subsidiary analyses also excluded participants with self reported diabetes mellitus or fasting blood glucose of 7 mmol/l or above at entry. We defined chronic kidney disease as either presence of proteinuria or estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, following the guidelines from the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (table 1) or, in subsidiary analyses, the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative criteria.24 25 We classified participants without chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and absence of proteinuria) into three groups on the basis of thresholds of estimated glomerular filtration rate used in a previous study: 60-74, 75-89, and ≥90 ml/min/1.73 m2.13
Table 1

 Chronic kidney disease staging system24

StageGlomerular filtration rate (ml/min/1.73 m2)Description
1≥90Normal or increased glomerular filtration rate, with other evidence of kidney damage*
260-89Slight decrease in glomerular filtration rate, with other evidence of kidney damage*
3a45-59Moderate decrease in glomerular filtration rate, with or without other evidence of kidney damage*
3b30-44
415-29Severe decrease in glomerular filtration rate, with or without other evidence of kidney damage*
5<15Established renal failure

*Evidence of kidney damage defined in this analysis as evidence of proteinuria assessed with urinary dipstick.

Chronic kidney disease staging system24 *Evidence of kidney damage defined in this analysis as evidence of proteinuria assessed with urinary dipstick. The principal outcome was coronary heart disease, defined as non-fatal or fatal myocardial infarction or coronary revascularisation. We restricted analyses to participants with complete information on relevant covariates. Participants contributed only their first non-fatal coronary heart disease outcomes or death (that is, we did not include deaths preceded by non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary revascularisation). We calculated hazard ratios by using Cox proportional models stratified by sex, using floating risks.26 Subsidiary analyses investigated the shape of associations by dividing the data into fifths of baseline values of estimated glomerular filtration rate, with further subdivision of the lowest fifth into three more groups, and using regression spline methods. To assess the prediction of risk for coronary heart disease with chronic kidney disease in addition to several conventional risk factors (age, sex, smoking, history of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, and total cholesterol), we calculated measures of discrimination for censored time to event data (Harrell’s C index) and reclassification (net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination index using 10 year risk categories of 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, and ≥20%).27 We compared the predictive gain provided by assessment of chronic kidney disease against that provided by information on diabetes and smoking status, removing each of these variables from a risk model containing several conventional risk factors plus chronic kidney disease. We used Stata version 11 for statistical analyses, with two sided tests and P<0.05.

Results

Baseline associations

The mean age of the 16 958 participants was 53 (range 33-81; SD 9) years, 51% were female, and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 79 (14) ml/min/1.73 m2 (table 2). Six per cent (1016) of participants had an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 60, 1.4% (241) had proteinuria, and 7% (1210) had chronic kidney disease at entry (65 had stage 1, 129 had stage 2, 939 had stage 3a, 65 had stage 3b, and 12 had stage 4). People with chronic kidney disease had higher mean levels of cardiovascular risk factors than did people without chronic kidney disease, except for smoking and male sex (table 2, web table B). During 383 553 person years at risk (median follow-up 24 (interquartile range 17-31) years), 4010 coronary heart disease outcomes, 559 deaths from stroke, 662 deaths from other vascular causes, and 3875 deaths from non-vascular causes were recorded.
Table 2

 Demographic and clinical baseline characteristics by chronic kidney disease (CKD) status. Values are numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise

CharacteristicsOverall population (n=16 958)Non-CKD (n=15 748)CKD (n=1210) P value
Demographic factors
Mean (SD) age (years)52.5 (8.6)51.9 (8.3)59.4 (9.8)<0.001
Male sex8237 (48.6)7848 (49.8)389 (32.1)<0.001
Established risk factors
Current cigarette smokers8013 (47.3)7570 (48.1)443 (36.6)<0.001
History of diabetes400 (2.4)351 (2.2)49 (4.0)<0.001
Mean (SD) systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)138 (22) (n=16 957)138 (21) (n=15 747)145 (25)<0.001
Mean (SD) diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)87 (12) (n=16 956)86 (12) (n=15 746)88 (13)<0.001
Mean (SD) body mass index (kg/m2)25.4 (3.9) (n=16 895)25.3 (3.8) (n=15 696)26.3 (4.4) (n=1199)<0.001
Blood based factors
Mean (SD) total cholesterol (mmol/l)6.48 (1.16) (n=16 942)6.46 (1.15) (n=15 734)6.74 (1.28) (n=1208)<0.001
Mean (SD) log triglycerides (mmol/l)0.02 (0.45) (n=16 447)0.01 (0.44) (n=15 263)0.16 (0.45) (n=1184)<0.001
Mean (SD) fasting glucose (mmol/l)4.48 (0.74) (n=16 905)4.47 (0.70) (n=15 698)4.57 (1.08) (n=1207)<0.001
Mean (SD) log erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h)1.90 (0.94) (n=16 066)1.88 (0.93) (n=14 916)2.13 (0.97) (n=1150)<0.001
Socioeconomic factors
Non-manual occupation5841/10 889 (53.6)5441/10 260 (53.0)400/629 (63.6)<0.001
Education beyond high school2558 (15.1)2394 (15.2)164 (13.6)0.123
Renal markers
Mean (SD) creatinine (mg/dl)0.95 (0.18)0.93 (0.15)1.17 (0.33)<0.001
Mean (SD) eGFR (MDRD equation)78.7 (14.4)80.2 (13.2)58.7 (14.8)<0.001
Positive urine protein241 (1.4)0241 (19.9)<0.001

eGFR=estimated glomerular filtration rate; MDRD=modification of diet for renal disease.

16 369 participants had complete information on smoking status, history of diabetes, total cholesterol, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, and body mass index.

Demographic and clinical baseline characteristics by chronic kidney disease (CKD) status. Values are numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise eGFR=estimated glomerular filtration rate; MDRD=modification of diet for renal disease. 16 369 participants had complete information on smoking status, history of diabetes, total cholesterol, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, and body mass index.

Hazard ratios with disease outcomes

Compared with the reference group (estimated glomerular filtration rate of 75-89 ml/min/1.73 m2 and without proteinuria), people at each clinically defined stage of chronic kidney disease had higher risk of coronary heart disease (fig 1 , table 3, web table C). This relation was non-linear in shape, and the possibility existed of a weakly positive hazard ratio in people without chronic kidney disease who had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 90 ml/min/1.73 m2 or above. Regression spline analyses yielded broadly similar findings (web fig A). In analyses comparing people with and without chronic kidney disease, the hazard ratio for coronary heart disease was 1.53 (95% confidence interval 1.36 to 1.71) after adjustment for age and sex only; it was 1.45 (1.29 to 1.62) after further adjustment for smoking status, history of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, total cholesterol, and triglycerides (“further adjustment”). In analyses comparing people with and without proteinuria, the hazard ratio for coronary heart disease was 1.96 (1.60 to 2.40) after adjustment for age and sex only and 1.72 (1.40 to 2.11) after further adjustment. The hazard ratio for coronary heart disease with chronic kidney disease was possibly higher in people with diabetes, but it did not vary considerably by other risk factors recorded (web fig B). After further adjustment, hazard ratios with chronic kidney disease were 1.21 (0.75 to 1.95) for ischaemic stroke, 1.18 (0.77 to 1.80) for unclassified stroke, 1.02 (0.55 to 1.89) for haemorrhagic stroke, 0.71 (0.37 to 1.33) for other deaths attributed to cerebrovascular disease, and 1.22 (0.89 to 1.66) for other deaths from vascular disease (mainly heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, and pulmonary embolism) (fig 2).

Fig 1 Renal function and risk of coronary heart disease and non-vascular mortality. Hazard ratios are adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes, total cholesterol, log triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, and body mass index. All hazard ratios are compared with people without chronic kidney disease with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 75-89 ml/min/1.73 m2 and plotted against mean eGFR within each group. Size of data markers is proportional to inverse of variance of hazard ratios. Confidence intervals are calculated using floating variances; eGFR is calculated using MDRD equation

Table 3

 Association of renal function with coronary heart disease and non-vascular mortality

Renal functionNoCoronary heart diseaseNon-vascular mortality
No of eventsAge and sex adjustedFurther adjusted*No of eventsAge and sex adjustedFurther adjusted*
Participants without chronic kidney disease
eGFR ≥90 ml/min/1.73 m232658721.09 (1.02 to 1.17)1.11 (1.03 to 1.19)8031.15 (1.07 to 1.24)1.13 (1.05 to 1.21)
eGFR 75-89 ml/min/1.73 m2603114781.00 (0.95 to 1.05)1.00 (0.95 to 1.06)14041.00 (0.95 to 1.06)1.00 (0.95 to 1.06)
eGFR 60-74 ml/min/1.73 m2590213191.04 (0.99 to 1.10)1.02 (0.97 to 1.08)13460.94 (0.89 to 0.99)0.95 (0.90 to 1.00)
Participants with chronic kidney disease‡
Stage 1 (eGFR ≥90 ml/min/1.73 m2 plus proteinuria)†63221.77 (1.16 to 2.69)1.55 (1.02 to 2.35)131.37 (0.79 to 2.36)1.33 (0.77 to 2.29)
Stage 2 (eGFR 60-89 ml/min/1.73 m2 plus proteinuria)125541.94 (1.49 to 2.54)1.72 (1.30 to 2.24)210.83 (0.54 to 1.27)0.76 (0.50 to 1.17)
Stage 3a (eGFR 45-59 ml/min/1.73 m2)†9082401.44 (1.26 to 1.64)1.39 (1.22 to 1.58)2581.03 (0.90 to 1.16)1.06 (0.94 to 1.21)
Stage 3b (eGFR 30-44 ml/min/1.73 m2)†63202.26 (1.45 to 3.51)1.90 (1.22 to 2.96)261.81 (1.23 to 2.67)1.82 (1.24 to 2.68)
Stage 4 (eGFR 15-29 ml/min/1.73 m2)†1256.46 (2.69 to 15.5)4.29 (1.78 to 10.3)46.40 (2.40 to 17.1)5.97 (2.24 to 15.9)

eGFR=estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Analysis restricted to 16 369 participants with complete information on smoking status, history of diabetes, total cholesterol, triglycerides (log transformed), systolic blood pressure, and body mass index.

*Additionally adjusted for smoking status, history of diabetes, total cholesterol, triglycerides (log transformed), systolic blood pressure, and body mass index.

†Reference group=people with eGFR 75-89 ml/min/m2 and no proteinuria.

‡No participants in this cohort were in stage 5 or kidney failure stage (that is, eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m2).

Fig 2 Risk of vascular and non-vascular outcomes in people with chronic kidney disease compared with people without chronic kidney disease. Analysis restricted to participants with complete information on smoking status, history of diabetes, total cholesterol, triglycerides (log transformed), systolic blood pressure, and body mass index. Hazard ratios are adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, log triglycerides, and body mass index. Size of data markers is proportional to inverse of variances of hazard ratios

Fig 1 Renal function and risk of coronary heart disease and non-vascular mortality. Hazard ratios are adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes, total cholesterol, log triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, and body mass index. All hazard ratios are compared with people without chronic kidney disease with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 75-89 ml/min/1.73 m2 and plotted against mean eGFR within each group. Size of data markers is proportional to inverse of variance of hazard ratios. Confidence intervals are calculated using floating variances; eGFR is calculated using MDRD equation Fig 2 Risk of vascular and non-vascular outcomes in people with chronic kidney disease compared with people without chronic kidney disease. Analysis restricted to participants with complete information on smoking status, history of diabetes, total cholesterol, triglycerides (log transformed), systolic blood pressure, and body mass index. Hazard ratios are adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, log triglycerides, and body mass index. Size of data markers is proportional to inverse of variances of hazard ratios Association of renal function with coronary heart disease and non-vascular mortality eGFR=estimated glomerular filtration rate. Analysis restricted to 16 369 participants with complete information on smoking status, history of diabetes, total cholesterol, triglycerides (log transformed), systolic blood pressure, and body mass index. *Additionally adjusted for smoking status, history of diabetes, total cholesterol, triglycerides (log transformed), systolic blood pressure, and body mass index. †Reference group=people with eGFR 75-89 ml/min/m2 and no proteinuria. ‡No participants in this cohort were in stage 5 or kidney failure stage (that is, eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m2). Associations between different stages of chronic kidney disease and the aggregate of non-vascular mortality were non-linear (fig 1, web fig A). Again, the possibility existed of a weakly positive hazard ratio in people without chronic kidney disease who had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 90 ml/min/1.73 m2 or above. In contrast with the findings for coronary heart disease, however, only people with stage 3b or stage 4 chronic kidney disease had a higher risk of non-vascular mortality compared with the reference group (fig 1, table 3). Hazard ratios were 0.97 (0.82 to 1.15) for mortality due to cancer and 1.26 (1.07 to 1.50) for mortality not attributed to cancer or vascular disease, including deaths from renal failure (fig 2). We found qualitatively similar findings to those reported here in analyses that used Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative criteria (web table D),25 used the CKD-EPI equation (web table E), used a competing risks model (web table F),28 compared subtypes of coronary heart disease (fig 2), excluded the initial five years of follow-up (web fig C), and considered the impact of undiagnosed new onset chronic kidney disease (web fig D). Too few deaths from non-vascular causes were available to allow us to subdivide outcomes further. Similar considerations apply to the small numbers of people who had proteinuria in chronic kidney disease stages 3 and 4.

Chronic kidney disease and coronary heart disease risk prediction

Addition of smoking status, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and diabetes to a coronary heart disease risk model containing only age (and stratified by sex) increased the C index from 0.6453 to 0.6963. Further addition of information on chronic kidney disease status increased the C index from 0.6963 to 0.6978, an increase of 0.0015 (0.0004 to 0.0026; P=0.010) denoting correct prediction of the order of coronary heart disease outcomes in a further 15 out of 10 000 pairs of participants screened. Addition of information on chronic kidney disease status to the risk factors listed above appropriately reclassified 5.3% of participants who developed coronary heart disease and 2.0% of participants who did not (web table G). After we took inappropriate reclassification into account, however, the overall net reclassification improvement was 1.04% (−0.93% to 3.02%; P=0.301). When we calculated the average absolute improvement in prediction of risk without categorisation into risk groups, the integrated improvement in discrimination was 0.0022 (0.0010 to 0.0033; P<0.001). This denotes an improvement equivalent to about 0.2% in predicted absolute risk for a typical screened person on addition of information on chronic kidney disease status to other risk factors. Compared with a model containing several conventional risk factors plus chronic kidney disease status, the C index decreased by 0.0015 (P=0.010) after removal of chronic kidney disease, by 0.0024 (P=0.002) after removal of diabetes, and by 0.0124 (P<0.001) after removal of smoking status (table 4). The decrease in the integrated discrimination improvement score was 0.0022 (P<0.001) after removal of chronic kidney disease, 0.0016 (P=0.017) after removal of diabetes, and 0.0063 (P<0.001) after removal of smoking status. The corresponding decrease in the net reclassification improvement was 1.04% (P=0.30) after removal of chronic kidney disease, 2.34% (P=0.003) after removal of diabetes, and 6.77% (P<0.001) after removal of smoking status. The incremental value of information on chronic kidney disease status was lower when added to more elaborate risk prediction models that used information on additional risk factors.
Table 4

 Change in metrics of coronary heart disease risk prediction on removal of chronic kidney disease, history of diabetes, or smoking status from a model containing other conventional risk factors

Factor omittedDiscrimination: decrease in C index (P value)Reclassification
IDI (P value)% NRI (P value)
Chronic kidney disease0.0015 (0.010)0.0022 (<0.001)1.04 (0.301)
History of diabetes0.0024 (0.002)0.0016 (0.017)2.34 (0.003)
Smoking status0.0124 (<0.001)0.0063 (<0.001)6.77 (<0.001)

Full model with conventional risk factors (stratified by sex) includes age, smoking status (current v other), history of diabetes (yes v no), total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, and chronic kidney disease (yes v no).

IDI=integrated discrimination index; NRI=net reclassification improvement.

Change in metrics of coronary heart disease risk prediction on removal of chronic kidney disease, history of diabetes, or smoking status from a model containing other conventional risk factors Full model with conventional risk factors (stratified by sex) includes age, smoking status (current v other), history of diabetes (yes v no), total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, and chronic kidney disease (yes v no). IDI=integrated discrimination index; NRI=net reclassification improvement.

Discussion

For people without manifest vascular disease, we have shown that even the earliest stages of chronic kidney disease are associated with higher risk of coronary heart disease. In people without clinically defined chronic kidney disease, however, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate was not significantly associated with risk of coronary heart disease. Hence, in contrast with blood pressure and total cholesterol, which each have log-linear relations with risk of coronary heart disease across their range of values,29 estimated glomerular filtration rate seems to be non-linearly related to risk of coronary heart disease. The risk threshold for estimated glomerular filtration rate seems to be near to 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, or the value that clinically defines chronic kidney disease. The lack of an appreciable change in associations in analyses that excluded people with diabetes at entry, omitted initial follow-up, or adjusted for several cardiovascular risk factors suggests that our results are robust. However, although plausible mechanisms have been proposed to suggest that impaired kidney function may itself be a causal factor in coronary heart disease,30 the possibility remains that chronic kidney disease is chiefly a marker of unfavourable cardiovascular risk profiles. We also found that advanced stages of chronic kidney disease were significantly associated with the aggregate of non-vascular mortality, particularly deaths not attributed to cancer (including, unsurprisingly, those related to end stage renal disease itself14). Our other main finding is that assessment of chronic kidney disease status in a general middle aged population only modestly improves prediction of risk for coronary heart disease when information is available on conventional cardiovascular risk factors. For example, the clinically relevant incremental gain provided by chronic kidney disease was about half that provided by history of diabetes and about a sixth that provided by history of smoking. Hence, although assessment of chronic kidney disease is potentially practicable on a population-wide basis (as it involves relatively simple blood and urine tests), further studies in other populations are needed to determine whether its use for screening for cardiovascular disease would be sufficiently informative to justify the cost and effort. In particular, populations with different profiles of prevalence of chronic kidney disease and other risk factors might yield different results for the incremental predictive value of information on chronic kidney disease status.

Strengths and limitations

We identified participants in population registers, achieved high response and follow-up rates, and used standard methods to assay serum creatinine. Nevertheless, our study had potential limitations. Our participants were of northern European descent, so the findings may not apply to other races. Although we used standard prediction equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate, they were originally developed in patients with kidney disease.31 We used qualitative urinary dipstick methods routinely used in clinical practice, but quantitative methods should be more sensitive.32 We did not have serial measurements on creatinine concentration or urinary protein. Although sensitivity analyses suggest that our results would be little affected by plausible rates of new onset chronic kidney disease, lack of correction for within person variability could have resulted in bias. Although we used robust methods to ascertain disease outcomes,22 preferential diagnoses in people known to have chronic kidney disease may have resulted in overestimation of hazard ratios. By contrast, some random misclassification inherent in using disease registers would have underestimated associations.

Conclusion

In people without manifest vascular disease, even the earliest stages of chronic kidney disease are associated with excess risk of subsequent coronary heart disease. Assessment of chronic kidney disease in addition to conventional risk factors modestly improves prediction of risk for coronary heart disease. Further studies are needed to investigate associations between chronic kidney disease and non-vascular mortality from causes other than cancer. Among people with cardiovascular disease and in the general population, impaired kidney function has been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality Even the earliest stages of chronic kidney disease are associated with higher risk of subsequent coronary heart disease Assessment of chronic kidney disease in addition to conventional risk factors modestly improves prediction of risk for coronary heart disease It provides about half as much predictive gain as does history of diabetes or about a sixth as much as does history of smoking
  30 in total

1.  Drawbacks of the use of indirect estimates of renal function to evaluate the effect of risk factors on renal function.

Authors:  Jacobien C Verhave; Ron T Gansevoort; Hans L Hillege; Dick De Zeeuw; Gary C Curhan; Paul E De Jong
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Floating absolute risk: an alternative to relative risk in survival and case-control analysis avoiding an arbitrary reference group.

Authors:  D F Easton; J Peto; A G Babiker
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Premature cardiovascular disease in chronic renal failure.

Authors:  C Baigent; K Burbury; D Wheeler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Incidence and prevalence of recognised and unrecognised myocardial infarction in women. The Reykjavik Study.

Authors:  L S Jónsdóttir; N Sigfusson; H Sigvaldason; G Thorgeirsson
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization.

Authors:  Alan S Go; Glenn M Chertow; Dongjie Fan; Charles E McCulloch; Chi-yuan Hsu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Relation between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Nagesh S Anavekar; John J V McMurray; Eric J Velazquez; Scott D Solomon; Lars Kober; Jean-Lucien Rouleau; Harvey D White; Rolf Nordlander; Aldo Maggioni; Kenneth Dickstein; Steven Zelenkofske; Jeffrey D Leimberger; Robert M Califf; Marc A Pfeffer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  John Danesh; Jeremy G Wheeler; Gideon M Hirschfield; Shinichi Eda; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Ann Rumley; Gordon D O Lowe; Mark B Pepys; Vilmundur Gudnason
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies.

Authors:  N Sarwar; P Gao; S R Kondapally Seshasai; R Gobin; S Kaptoge; E Di Angelantonio; E Ingelsson; D A Lawlor; E Selvin; M Stampfer; C D A Stehouwer; S Lewington; L Pennells; A Thompson; N Sattar; I R White; K K Ray; J Danesh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 202.731

9.  National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification.

Authors:  Andrew S Levey; Josef Coresh; Ethan Balk; Annamaria T Kausz; Adeera Levin; Michael W Steffes; Ronald J Hogg; Ronald D Perrone; Joseph Lau; Garabed Eknoyan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: a statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention.

Authors:  Mark J Sarnak; Andrew S Levey; Anton C Schoolwerth; Josef Coresh; Bruce Culleton; L Lee Hamm; Peter A McCullough; Bertram L Kasiske; Ellie Kelepouris; Michael J Klag; Patrick Parfrey; Marc Pfeffer; Leopoldo Raij; David J Spinosa; Peter W Wilson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  79 in total

1.  Analysis of a urinary biomarker panel for incident kidney disease and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Conall M O'Seaghdha; Shih-Jen Hwang; Martin G Larson; James B Meigs; Ramachandran S Vasan; Caroline S Fox
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  [Cardiorenal syndrome].

Authors:  M D Alscher; U Sechtem
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  Multiparametric Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging in Assessment of Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Jing Gao; Alan Perlman; Safa Kalache; Nathaniel Berman; Surya Seshan; Steven Salvatore; Lindsey Smith; Natasha Wehrli; Levi Waldron; Hanish Kodali; James Chevalier
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Cause of Death in Patients With Diabetic CKD Enrolled in the Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Events With Aranesp Therapy (TREAT).

Authors:  David M Charytan; Eldrin F Lewis; Akshay S Desai; Larry A Weinrauch; Peter Ivanovich; Robert D Toto; Brian Claggett; Jiankang Liu; L Howard Hartley; Peter Finn; Ajay K Singh; Andrew S Levey; Marc A Pfeffer; John J V McMurray; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Efficacy and safety of combined vs. single renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade in chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paweena Susantitaphong; Kamal Sewaralthahab; Ethan M Balk; Somchai Eiam-ong; Nicolaos E Madias; Bertrand L Jaber
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease and Cardiovascular Mortality After Major Surgery.

Authors:  Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti; Paul Thottakkara; Matthew Huber; Kent Berg; Nikolaus Gravenstein; Patrick Tighe; Gloria Lipori; Mark S Segal; Charles Hobson; Azra Bihorac
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Comparison of modification of diet in renal disease and chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration formulas in predicting long-term outcomes in patients undergoing stent implantation due to stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Tadeusz Osadnik; Jarosław Wasilewski; Andrzej Lekston; Joanna Strzelczyk; Anna Kurek; Aleksander Rafał Gutowski; Krzysztof Dyrbuś; Kamil Bujak; Rafał Reguła; Piotr Rozentryt; Bożena Szyguła-Jurkiewicz; Lech Poloński
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Placental Growth Factor as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with CKD from the NARA-CKD Study.

Authors:  Masaru Matsui; Shiro Uemura; Yukiji Takeda; Ken-Ichi Samejima; Takaki Matsumoto; Ayako Hasegawa; Hideo Tsushima; Ei Hoshino; Tomoya Ueda; Katsuhiko Morimoto; Keisuke Okamoto; Sadanori Okada; Kenji Onoue; Satoshi Okayama; Hiroyuki Kawata; Rika Kawakami; Naoki Maruyama; Yasuhiro Akai; Masayuki Iwano; Hideo Shiiki; Yoshihiko Saito
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Latency for cytomegalovirus impacts T cell ageing significantly in elderly end-stage renal disease patients.

Authors:  L Huang; A W Langerak; C C Baan; N H R Litjens; M G H Betjes
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  In vivo vascular wall shear rate and circumferential strain of renal disease patients.

Authors:  Dae Woo Park; Grant H Kruger; Jonathan M Rubin; James Hamilton; Paul Gottschalk; Robert E Dodde; Albert J Shih; William F Weitzel
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.