Literature DB >> 31009088

Pharmacogenomics guidelines: Current status and future development.

Chengxian Guo1, Xiaoxue Xie2, Jingao Li3, Lihua Huang4, Shaojun Chen5, Xi Li6, Xin Yi6, Qin Wu6, Guoping Yang1, Honghao Zhou7,8, Jun-Ping Liu9, Xiang Chen10,11.   

Abstract

Genetic polymorphisms impact biological responses to drugs. Current pharmacogenomics guidelines formulated by different countries, such as the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium, the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group, the Canadian Pharmacogenomics Network for Drug Safety, and the French National Network (Réseau) of Pharmacogenetics, play important roles in clinical practices. However, the standards for these guidelines vary significantly, resulting in differences in recommendations. The present article discusses these differences by head-to-head comparison of the existing pharmacogenomics guidelines and proposes new strategies for their future development.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Keywords:  guidelines; pharmacogenetics; pharmacogenomics

Year:  2019        PMID: 31009088     DOI: 10.1111/1440-1681.13097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol        ISSN: 0305-1870            Impact factor:   2.557


  8 in total

1.  Haplotyping pharmacogenes using TLA combined with Illumina or Nanopore sequencing.

Authors:  Laurentijn Tilleman; Kaat Rubben; Wim Van Criekinge; Dieter Deforce; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Evolution of HLA-B Pharmacogenomics and the Importance of PGx Data Integration in Health Care System: A 10 Years Retrospective Study in Thailand.

Authors:  Napatrupron Koomdee; Chiraphat Kloypan; Pimonpan Jinda; Jiratha Rachanakul; Thawinee Jantararoungtong; Rattanaporn Sukprasong; Santirhat Prommas; Nutthan Nuntharadthanaphong; Apichaya Puangpetch; Maliheh Ershadian; Shobana John; Mohitosh Biswas; Chonlaphat Sukasem
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 3.  Pharmacogenomic testing to support prescribing in primary care: a structured review of implementation models.

Authors:  Judith Hayward; John McDermott; Nadeem Qureshi; William Newman
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  GABRA1 and GABRB2 Polymorphisms are Associated with Propofol Susceptibility.

Authors:  Youjie Zeng; Si Cao; Minghua Chen; Chao Fang; Wen Ouyang
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-09

5.  Impact of Variants in the ATIC and ARID5B Genes on Therapeutic Failure with Imatinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Karla Beatriz Cardias Cereja Pantoja; Tereza Cristina de Brito Azevedo; Darlen Cardoso de Carvalho; Natasha Monte; Amanda de Nazaré Cohen Paes; Maria Clara da Costa Barros; Lui Wallacy Morikawa Souza Vinagre; Ana Rosa Sales de Freitas; Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano; Paulo Pimentel de Assumpção; Sidney Emanuel Batista Dos Santos; Marianne Rodrigues Fernandes; Ney Pereira Carneiro Dos Santos
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Cas9 targeted nanopore sequencing with enhanced variant calling improves CYP2D6-CYP2D7 hybrid allele genotyping.

Authors:  Kaat Rubben; Laurentijn Tilleman; Koen Deserranno; Olivier Tytgat; Dieter Deforce; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.020

Review 7.  Strategies to Improve the Clinical Outcomes for Direct-to-Consumer Pharmacogenomic Tests.

Authors:  Alireza Tafazoli; Rama Krishna Guggilla; Zahra Kamel-Koleti; Wojciech Miltyk
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  A Survey of Pharmacogenomics Testing Among Physicians, Pharmacists, and Researchers From China.

Authors:  Chengxian Guo; Biwen Hu; Chengjun Guo; Xiangguang Meng; Yun Kuang; Longjian Huang; Danling Wang; Kangwei Xu; Yanlin Zhao; Guoping Yang; Weimin Cai; Yan Shu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 5.810

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.