Literature DB >> 33802585

Strategies to Improve the Clinical Outcomes for Direct-to-Consumer Pharmacogenomic Tests.

Alireza Tafazoli1,2, Rama Krishna Guggilla3, Zahra Kamel-Koleti4, Wojciech Miltyk1.   

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GT) have become a bridge between marketing and traditional healthcare services. After earning FDA endorsement for such facilities, several fast-developing companies started to compete in the related area. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) tests have been introduced as potentially one of the main medical services of such companies. Most of the individuals will be interested in finding out about the phenotypic consequences of their genetic variants and molecular risk factors against diverse medicines they take or will take later. Direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic tests (DTC-PT) is still in its young age, however it is expected to expand rapidly through the industry in the future. The result of PGx tests could be considered as the main road toward the implementation of personalized and precision medicine in the clinic. This narrative critical review study provides a descriptive overview on DTC-GT, then focuses on DTC-PT, and also introduces and suggests the potential approaches for improving the clinical related outcomes of such tests on healthcare systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical related outcome; direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic tests; personalized medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33802585      PMCID: PMC7999840          DOI: 10.3390/genes12030361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes (Basel)        ISSN: 2073-4425            Impact factor:   4.096


  39 in total

Review 1.  The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.

Authors:  Stuart Hogarth; Gail Javitt; David Melzer
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.929

Review 2.  Pharmacogenomics in the clinic.

Authors:  Mary V Relling; William E Evans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Direct-to-Consumer Testing 2.0: Emerging Models of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Megan A Allyse; David H Robinson; Matthew J Ferber; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Genetic variation and pharmacogenomics: concepts, facts, and challenges.

Authors:  Margret R Hoehe; Thomas Kroslak
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.986

5.  Whole genome sequencing in pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Theodora Katsila; George P Patrinos
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Pharmacogenetic testing through the direct-to-consumer genetic testing company 23andMe.

Authors:  Mengfei Lu; Cathryn M Lewis; Matthew Traylor
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.063

7.  Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Data Privacy: Key Concerns and Recommendations Based on Consumer Perspectives.

Authors:  Rachele M Hendricks-Sturrup; Christine Y Lu
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2019-05-09

8.  Ethical issues in consumer genome sequencing: Use of consumers' samples and data.

Authors:  Emilia Niemiec; Heidi Carmen Howard
Journal:  Appl Transl Genom       Date:  2016-02-01

Review 9.  Updating the landscape of direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing.

Authors:  Kelly K Filipski; John D Murphy; Kathy J Helzlsouer
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2017-08-22

10.  Prevalence and types of inconsistencies in clinical pharmacogenetic recommendations among major U.S. sources.

Authors:  Tyler Shugg; Amy L Pasternak; Bianca London; Jasmine A Luzum
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 8.617

View more
  1 in total

1.  Perception of personalized medicine, pharmacogenomics, and genetic testing among undergraduates in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Nicholas Yan Chai Cheung; Jasmine Lee Fong Fung; Yvette Nga Chung Ng; Wilfred Hing Sang Wong; Claudia Ching Yan Chung; Christopher Chun Yu Mak; Brian Hon Yin Chung
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.