Carrie H Colla1, Valerie A Lewis1,2, Courtney Stachowski1, Benjamin Usadi1, Daniel J Gottlieb1, Julie P W Bynum1,3,4. 1. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH. 2. Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School. 4. Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in more and less discretionary condition-specific postacute care use (skilled nursing, inpatient rehabilitation, home health) associated with Medicare accountable care organization (ACO) implementation. DATA SOURCES: 2009-2014 Medicare fee-for-service claims. STUDY DESIGN: Difference-in-difference methodology comparing postacute outcomes after hospitalization for hip fracture and stroke (where rehabilitation is fundamental to the episode of care) to pneumonia, (where it is more discretionary) for beneficiaries attributed to ACO and non-ACO providers. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Across all 3 cohorts, in the baseline period ACO patients were more likely to receive Medicare-paid postacute care and had higher episode spending. In hip fracture patients where rehabilitation is standard of care, ACO implementation was associated with 6%-8% increases in probability of admission to a skilled nursing facility or inpatient rehabilitation (compared with home without care), and a slight reduction in readmissions. In a clinical condition where rehabilitation is more discretionary, pneumonia, ACO implementation was not associated with changes in postacute location, but episodic spending decreased 2%-3%. Spending decreases were concentrated in the least complex patients. Across all cohorts, the length of stay in skilled nursing facilities decreased with ACO implementation. CONCLUSIONS: ACOs decreased spending on postacute care by decreasing use of discretionary services. ACO implementation was associated with reduced length of stay in skilled nursing facilities, while hip fracture patients used institutional postacute settings at higher rates. Among pneumonia patients, we observed decreases in spending, readmission days, and mortality associated with ACO implementation.
OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in more and less discretionary condition-specific postacute care use (skilled nursing, inpatient rehabilitation, home health) associated with Medicare accountable care organization (ACO) implementation. DATA SOURCES: 2009-2014 Medicare fee-for-service claims. STUDY DESIGN: Difference-in-difference methodology comparing postacute outcomes after hospitalization for hip fracture and stroke (where rehabilitation is fundamental to the episode of care) to pneumonia, (where it is more discretionary) for beneficiaries attributed to ACO and non-ACO providers. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Across all 3 cohorts, in the baseline period ACO patients were more likely to receive Medicare-paid postacute care and had higher episode spending. In hip fracturepatients where rehabilitation is standard of care, ACO implementation was associated with 6%-8% increases in probability of admission to a skilled nursing facility or inpatient rehabilitation (compared with home without care), and a slight reduction in readmissions. In a clinical condition where rehabilitation is more discretionary, pneumonia, ACO implementation was not associated with changes in postacute location, but episodic spending decreased 2%-3%. Spending decreases were concentrated in the least complex patients. Across all cohorts, the length of stay in skilled nursing facilities decreased with ACO implementation. CONCLUSIONS: ACOs decreased spending on postacute care by decreasing use of discretionary services. ACO implementation was associated with reduced length of stay in skilled nursing facilities, while hip fracturepatients used institutional postacute settings at higher rates. Among pneumoniapatients, we observed decreases in spending, readmission days, and mortality associated with ACO implementation.
Authors: Michael C Munin; Karen Seligman; Mary Amanda Dew; Tanya Quear; Elizabeth R Skidmore; Gary Gruen; Charles F Reynolds; Eric J Lenze Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Gregory Kennedy; Valerie A Lewis; Souma Kundu; Julien Mousqués; Carrie H Colla Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Carrie H Colla; Valerie A Lewis; Lee-Sien Kao; A James O'Malley; Chiang-Hua Chang; Elliott S Fisher Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Janet K Freburger; George M Holmes; Li-Jung E Ku; Malcolm P Cutchin; Kendra Heatwole-Shank; Lloyd J Edwards Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Joshua K Johnson; Michael B Rothberg; Kellie Adams; Brittany Lapin; Tamra Keeney; Mary Stilphen; Francois Bethoux; Janet K Freburger Journal: Med Care Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 3.178
Authors: Allie Peckham; David Rudoler; Dominika Bhatia; Sara Allin; Reham Abdelhalim; Gregory P Marchildon Journal: Int J Integr Care Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 5.120