PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The objective of this review is to provide an overview of recent findings in technology-based methods for the collection and analysis of dietary information, and explore the potential implications of these technologies for dietary assessment in a clinical setting. RECENT FINDINGS: Numerous technology-based methods for dietary assessment have emerged in recent years. These methodologies have the potential to enhance the dietary assessment process, and overall appear to yield valid results in a wide variety of populations. However, as is the case with the existing technologies they are designed to replace, none is error free and each has its own unique limitations. Therefore, the decision to incorporate one of these methodologies into clinical practice should only be made after a thorough evaluation of the methodology and with specific outcome goals in mind. SUMMARY: Evidence supporting the emerging role of technology-based methods for dietary assessment is growing. As technological advances move rapidly forward it is important to consider a theoretical foundation to help guide the translation of these innovations into routine use in clinical practice.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The objective of this review is to provide an overview of recent findings in technology-based methods for the collection and analysis of dietary information, and explore the potential implications of these technologies for dietary assessment in a clinical setting. RECENT FINDINGS: Numerous technology-based methods for dietary assessment have emerged in recent years. These methodologies have the potential to enhance the dietary assessment process, and overall appear to yield valid results in a wide variety of populations. However, as is the case with the existing technologies they are designed to replace, none is error free and each has its own unique limitations. Therefore, the decision to incorporate one of these methodologies into clinical practice should only be made after a thorough evaluation of the methodology and with specific outcome goals in mind. SUMMARY: Evidence supporting the emerging role of technology-based methods for dietary assessment is growing. As technological advances move rapidly forward it is important to consider a theoretical foundation to help guide the translation of these innovations into routine use in clinical practice.
Authors: Amanda Raffoul; Erin P Hobin; Jocelyn E Sacco; Kirsten M Lee; Jess Haines; Paula J Robson; Kevin W Dodd; Sharon I Kirkpatrick Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Valisa E Hedrick; Andrea M Dietrich; Paul A Estabrooks; Jyoti Savla; Elena Serrano; Brenda M Davy Journal: Nutr J Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Anne M Gilsing; Erin Hobin; Nathan M Solbak; Angela Wallace; Jess Haines; Alexandra J Mayhew; Sarah K Orr; Parminder Raina; Paula J Robson; Jocelyn E Sacco; Heather K Whelan Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Jozef Hooson Jzh; Jayne Hutchinson Jyh; Marisol Warthon-Medina; Neil Hancock; Katharine Greathead; Bethany Knowles; Elisa Vargas-Garcia; Lauren E Gibson; Linda A Bush; Barrie Margetts; Sian Robinson; Andy Ness; Nisreen A Alwan; Petra A Wark; Mark Roe; Paul Finglas; Toni Steer; Polly Page; Laura Johnson; Katharine Roberts; Birdem Amoutzopoulos; Victoria J Burley; Darren C Greenwood; Janet E Cade Journal: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 11.176
Authors: Maurizio Caon; Federica Prinelli; Leonardo Angelini; Stefano Carrino; Elena Mugellini; Silvia Orte; José C E Serrano; Sarah Atkinson; Anne Martin; Fulvio Adorni Journal: Front Nutr Date: 2022-03-17
Authors: Caroline M Blanchard; Meghan K Chin; Cheryl H Gilhooly; Kathryn Barger; Gregory Matuszek; Akari J Miki; Richard G Côté; Alison L Eldridge; Hilary Green; Fabio Mainardi; Damian Mehers; Frédéric Ronga; Vera Steullet; Sai Krupa Das Journal: J Nutr Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Martine Laville; Berenice Segrestin; Maud Alligier; Cristina Ruano-Rodríguez; Lluis Serra-Majem; Michael Hiesmayr; Annemie Schols; Carlo La Vecchia; Yves Boirie; Ana Rath; Edmund A M Neugebauer; Silvio Garattini; Vittorio Bertele; Christine Kubiak; Jacques Demotes-Mainard; Janus C Jakobsen; Snezana Djurisic; Christian Gluud Journal: Trials Date: 2017-09-11 Impact factor: 2.279