| Literature DB >> 31004914 |
Irene Sintini1, Peter R Martin2, Jonathan Graff-Radford3, Matthew L Senjem4, Christopher G Schwarz5, Mary M Machulda6, Anthony J Spychalla5, Daniel A Drubach3, David S Knopman3, Ronald C Petersen3, Val J Lowe5, Clifford R Jack5, Keith A Josephs3, Jennifer L Whitwell5.
Abstract
The aims of this study were: to examine regional rates of change in tau-PET uptake and grey matter volume in atypical Alzheimer's disease (AD); to investigate the role of age in such changes; to describe multimodal regional relationships between tau accumulation and atrophy. Thirty atypical AD patients underwent baseline and one-year follow-up MRI, [18F]AV-1451 PET and PiB PET. Region- and voxel-level rates of tau accumulation and grey matter atrophy relative to cognitively unimpaired individuals, and the influence of age on such rates, were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed between baseline measurements and rates of change, between baseline tau and atrophy, and between the two rates of change. Regional patterns of change in tau and volume differed, with highest rates of tau accumulation in frontal lobe and highest rates of atrophy in temporoparietal regions. Age had a negative effect on disease progression, predominantly on tau, with younger patients having a more rapid accumulation. Baseline tau uptake and regions of tau accumulation were disconnected, with high baseline tau uptake across the cortex correlated with high rates of tau accumulation in frontal and sensorimotor regions. In contrast, baseline volume and atrophy were locally related in the occipitoparietal regions. Higher tau uptake at baseline was locally related to higher rates of atrophy in frontal and occipital lobes. Tau accumulation rates positively correlated with rates of atrophy. In summary, our study showed that tau accumulation and atrophy presented different regional patterns in atypical AD, with tau spreading into the frontal lobes while atrophy remains in temporoparietal and occipital cortex, suggesting a temporal disconnect between protein deposition and neurodegeneration.Entities:
Keywords: Atrophy; Atypical AD; Longitudinal tau-PET; Multimodal imaging
Year: 2019 PMID: 31004914 PMCID: PMC6475765 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101823
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Demographic and clinical features of the patients. Data are shown as median (inter-quartile range), or N (%).
| LPA ( | PCA ( | Total (N = 30) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | |||
| Female sex | 14 (77.8%) | 8 (66.7%) | 22 (73.3%) |
| Age at onset (years) | 64 (58, 72) | 57 (54, 62) | 62 (56, 66) |
| Age at baseline scan (years) | 68 (59, 74) | 64 (60, 69) | 66 (59, 71) |
| Disease duration (years) | 2 (2, 3) | 4 (4, 6) | 3 (2, 5) |
| Left handedness | 4 (22.2%) | 2 (16.7%) | 6 (20.0%) |
| Baseline global PiB | 2.49 (2.25, 2.92) | 2.49 (2.34, 2.56) | 2.49 (2.32, 2.75) |
| ApoE e4 carrier prevalence | 6 (33.3%) | 5 (41.7%) | 11 (36.7%) |
| White matter hyperintensity volume at baseline (cm3) | 12.3 (9.8, 18.3) | 16.8 (13.2, 25.1) | 13.9 (9.9, 19.7) |
| Scan interval (days, baseline and follow-up) – MRI | 364 (348, 376) | 384 (356, 406) | 368 (348, 398) |
| Scan interval (days, baseline and follow-up) – Tau-PET | 362 (349, 374) | 384 (356, 406) | 367 (349, 405) |
| Scan interval (days, baseline) – MRI and Tau-PET | 0 (0, 1) | 0 (−1, 1) | 0 (0, 1) |
| Scan interval (days, follow-up) – MRI and Tau-PET | 1 (0, 1) | 0 (−1, 1) | 0 (−1, 1) |
| Neurological evaluation | |||
| MoCA | |||
| Baseline | 19 (17, 22) | 18 (15, 25) | 18 (16, 24) |
| Follow-up | 14 (11, 17) | 13 (10, 18) | 13 (10, 18) |
| Annualized change | −5 (−7, −4) | -6 (−6, −5) | -5 (−7, −4) |
| Cambridge behavioral inventory | |||
| Baseline | 16 (13, 26) | 60 (17, 76) | 21 (14, 59) |
| Follow-up | 26 (20, 47) | 56 (32, 90) | 34 (20, 62) |
| Annualized change | 12 (3, 22) | 15 (0, 23) | 12 (0, 23) |
| CDR sum of boxes | |||
| Baseline | 2 (1, 3) | 4 (3, 6) | 2 (1, 4) |
| Follow-up | 4 (2, 4) | 6 (4, 8) | 4 (3, 6) |
| Annualized change | 2 (1, 3) | 2 (1, 3) | 2 (1, 3) |
| Optic ataxia | |||
| Baseline | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (33.3%) | 4 (13.3%) |
| Follow-up | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (60.0%) | 6 (22.2%) |
| Oculomotor apraxia | |||
| Baseline | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (33.3%) | 4 (13.3%) |
| Follow-up | 1 (5.9%) | 5 (50.0%) | 6 (22.2%) |
| WAB Praxis | |||
| Baseline | 58 (56, 60) | 60 (56, 60) | 60 (56, 60) |
| Follow-up | 58 (57, 59) | 58 (47, 59) | 58 (55, 59) |
| Annualized change | −2 (−3, 0) | −1 (−2, 0) | −1 (−3, 0) |
| Gerstmann syndrome (out of 7) | |||
| Baseline | 5 (5, 7) | 5 (2, 6) | 5 (4, 6) |
| Follow-up | 3 (2, 4) | 4 (1, 5) | 3 (2, 5) |
| Annualized change | −2 (−3, −1) | −1 (−2, 0) | −2 (−2, 0) |
| Simultanagnosia (out of 20) | |||
| Baseline | 18 (17, 20) | 8 (4, 13) | 17 (9, 19) |
| Follow-up | 18 (16, 18) | 5 (2, 8) | 16 (7, 18) |
| Annualized change | −2 (−2, 0) | −3 (−5, 0) | −2 (−3, 0) |
| Neuropsychological evaluation | |||
| WMS III VR % ret. MOANS | |||
| Baseline | 9 (7, 11) | 8 (7, 9) | 9 (7, 11) |
| Follow-up | 8 (5, 12) | 8 (3, 11) | 8 (4, 12) |
| Annualized change | −1 (−3, 1) | −1 (−4, 3) | −1 (−4, 1) |
| BDAE sentence repetition | |||
| Baseline | 7 (6, 8) | 8 (7, 9) | 8 (6, 9) |
| Follow-up | 6 (4, 7) | 8 (6, 10) | 6 (5, 8) |
| Annualized change | −1 (−2, −1) | 0 (−1, 0) | −1 (−2, 0) |
| Boston naming test | |||
| Baseline | 11 (9, 12) | 10 (8, 13) | 11 (8, 13) |
| Follow-up | 7 (2, 12) | 10 (6, 13) | 8 (4, 12) |
| Annualized change | −2 (−4, −1) | −1 (−2, −1) | −2 (−3, −1) |
| Letter fluency (sum FAS) | |||
| Baseline | 26 (21, 32) | 34 (28, 47) | 31 (22, 36) |
| Follow-up | 18 (12, 25) | 29 (20, 42) | 22 (14, 32) |
| Annualized change | −7 (−12, −6) | −9 (−11, −4) | −8 (−12, −6) |
| Animal fluency | |||
| Baseline | 10 (8, 13) | 11 (8, 18) | 10 (8, 15) |
| Follow-up | 8 (7, 9) | 10 (7, 14) | 8 (7, 12) |
| Annualized change | −2 (−4, −1) | −3 (−4, −1) | −2 (−4, −1) |
| VOSP letters | |||
| Baseline | 19 (18, 20) | 14 (6, 18) | 18 (14, 19) |
| Follow-up | 19 (18, 20) | 11 (6, 16) | 18 (11, 19) |
| Annualized change | 0 (−1, 0) | −3 (−8, 0) | 0 (−3, 0) |
| Rey-O MOANS | |||
| Baseline | 6 (2, 9) | 2 (2, 2) | 2 (2, 6) |
| Follow-up | 3 (2, 6) | 2 (2, 2) | 2 (2, 4) |
| Annualized change | 0 (−2, 0) | 0 (0, 0) | 0 (−1, 0) |
MoCA = Montreal Cognitive Assessment Battery; CDR = Clinical Dementia Rating Scale; NPI-Q = Neuropsychiatric Inventory brief questionnaire version; MDS-UPDRS III = Movement Disorder's Society sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; WAB Praxis = Western Aphasia Battery ideomotor apraxia scale; WMS III VR % ret. = Wechsler Memory Scale-III visual reproduction percent retention; BDAE = Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination; MOANS = Mayo Older American Normative scale; VOSP = Visual Object and Space Perception Battery; Rey-O = Rey Osterrieth. Details of how optic ataxia, oculomotor apraxia, Gerstmann syndrome and simultanagnosia were assessed are provided in (Tetzloff et al., 2018). Specifically, the simultanagnosia test was designed to assess the individuals ability to perceive the overall meaning/shape of the figure/object/picture instead of recognizing bits and pieces, and included, for example, pictures of overlapping line drawings, pictures of fragmented numbers, and pictures of objects/letters whose shape was created from smaller items.
Fig. 1Median and distribution estimates of regional annualized changes in tau SUVR. Bars cover 80% (thick bar) to 95% (thin bar) intervals of posterior estimates (i.e. confidence intervals). Regional decade effects (i.e. how the regional change relates to age) are showed on the right.
Fig. 2Median and distribution estimates of regional annualized percent changes in MRI grey matter (GM) volumes. Bars cover 80% (thick bar) to 95% (thin bar) intervals of posterior estimates (i.e. confidence intervals). Regional decade effects (i.e. how the regional change relates to age) are showed on the right.
Between-lobes comparisons of annualized rates of change in tau SUVR (A) and MRI annualized log Jacobians (B). The value in each cell represents the posterior probability that the column label lobe has a higher annualized change than the row label lobe. For example, from A, the frontal lobe is slightly more likely (p = 0.648) to have more tau accumulation than the sensorimotor lobe. From B, the frontal lobe is highly likely (p = 0.993) to have more atrophy than the sensorimotor lobe.
| Lobe | Frontal | Sensorimotor | Medial temporal | Lateral temporal | Medial parietal | Lateral parietal | Medial occipital | Lateral occipital |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annualized rates of change in tau SUVR | ||||||||
| Frontal | 0.352 | <0.001 | 0.180 | >0.999 | 0.766 | <0.001 | 0.001 | |
| Sensorimotor | 0.648 | <0.001 | 0.338 | >0.999 | 0.820 | <0.001 | 0.005 | |
| Medial temporal | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 | |
| Lateral temporal | 0.820 | 0.662 | <0.001 | >0.999 | 0.910 | <0.001 | 0.010 | |
| Medial parietal | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.005 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Lateral parietal | 0.234 | 0.180 | <0.001 | 0.090 | 0.995 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Medial occipital | >0.999 | >0.999 | <0.001 | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 | 0.815 | |
| Lateral occipital | 0.999 | 0.995 | <0.001 | 0.990 | >0.999 | >0.999 | 0.185 | |
| MRI annualized log Jacobians | ||||||||
| Frontal | 0.007 | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 | 0.075 | >0.999 | |
| Sensorimotor | 0.993 | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 | 0.690 | >0.999 | |
| Medial Temporal | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.136 | 0.938 | 0.652 | <0.001 | >0.999 | |
| Lateral Temporal | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.864 | 0.994 | 0.925 | <0.001 | >0.999 | |
| Medial Parietal | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.062 | 0.006 | 0.130 | <0.001 | >0.999 | |
| Lateral Parietal | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.348 | 0.075 | 0.870 | <0.001 | >0.999 | |
| Medial Occipital | 0.925 | 0.310 | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 | |
| Lateral Occipital | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Supplemental Fig. 1Regional annualized changes in tau SUVR (left) and regional annualized percent changes in MRI grey matter (GM) volumes (right) for each patient.
Fig. 3SPM maps of increased tau-PET uptake (A), decreased MRI grey matter volume (B) and increased Aβ-PET uptake (C) at baseline and follow-up for the entire cohort and for the two disease variants relative to cognitively unimpaired. Results are shown after FWE correction for multiple comparison at p < 0.05.
Fig. 4SPM maps of annualized change in tau-PET uptake (A) and MRI annualized log Jacobians (B) for the entire patient cohort (top) and for the two disease variants (bottom) relative to cognitively unimpaired. Results are shown after FWE correction for multiple comparison at p < 0.05.
Supplemental Fig. 2SPM maps of annualized change in tau-PET uptake from partial-volume corrected images for the entire patient cohort (top) and for the two disease variants (bottom) relative to cognitively unimpaired. Results are shown after FWE correction for multiple comparison at p < 0.05.
Fig. 5SPM maps of the effect of age on the annualized change in tau-PET uptake (A) and on the MRI annualized log Jacobians (B). Younger patients experienced faster tau accumulation and volume loss than older patients. Results are shown uncorrected at p < 0.001.
Fig. 6Pearson's correlations (top) and SCCA (bottom) between baseline tau SUVR and tau SUVR annualized changes (A) and between baseline MRI volumes and MRI annualized log Jacobians (B).
Fig. 7Pearson's correlations (top) and SCCA (bottom) between baseline tau SUVR and MRI annualized log Jacobians (A) and between tau SUVR annualized changes and MRI annualized log Jacobians (B).