Sarah L Goff1, Kathleen M Mazor2, Aruna Priya3, Penelope S Pekow4, Peter K Lindenauer5. 1. School of Public Health and Health Sciences (SL Goff and PS Pekow), University of Massachusetts-Amherst; Department of Medicine (SL Goff and PK Lindenauer); Institute for Health Care Delivery and Population Science (SL Goff, A Priya, PS Pekow, and PK Lindenauer), University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (SL Goff and PK Lindenauer). Electronic address: sgoff@umass.edu. 2. Department of Medicine (KM Mazor); Meyers Primary Care Institute (KM Mazor), University of Massachusetts Medical School-Worcester. 3. Institute for Health Care Delivery and Population Science (SL Goff, A Priya, PS Pekow, and PK Lindenauer), University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield. 4. School of Public Health and Health Sciences (SL Goff and PS Pekow), University of Massachusetts-Amherst; Institute for Health Care Delivery and Population Science (SL Goff, A Priya, PS Pekow, and PK Lindenauer), University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield. 5. Department of Medicine (SL Goff and PK Lindenauer); Institute for Health Care Delivery and Population Science (SL Goff, A Priya, PS Pekow, and PK Lindenauer), University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (SL Goff and PK Lindenauer).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Performance on pediatric quality measures varies across primary care practices. Health care quality is associated with organizational factors, but their effect is understudied in pediatric care. This study aimed to develop hypotheses regarding the relationship between organizational factors and composite scores on pediatric quality measures. METHODS: Using a positive deviance approach, semistructured interviews were conducted with pediatricians and staff (N = 35) at 10 purposively selected high-performing pediatric primary care practices in Massachusetts between September and December 2016. Practices were sampled to achieve diversity in geographic location, size, and organizational structure. Interviews aimed to identify organizational strategies (eg, care processes) and contextual factors (eg, teamwork) that may be associated with performance on quality measures. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative content analytic methods. RESULTS: We identified 4 major themes (MTs): MT1, Practice Culture; MT2, Practice Structures and Quality Improvement Tools; MT3, Attitudes and Beliefs Related to Measuring Care Quality; and MT4, Perceived Barriers to Achieving High Performance on Quality Measures. MT1 subthemes included contextual factors such as teamwork, leadership, and feeling respected as an employee. MT2 subthemes included fixed characteristics such as practice size and strategies such as the use of an electronic medical record. MT3 and MT4 subthemes linked these constructs to factors external to the practices. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that elements of organizational culture may play as important a role in the quality of care delivered as specific quality improvement strategies. Interventions to further test this relationship may aid practices seeking to improve the care they deliver.
OBJECTIVE: Performance on pediatric quality measures varies across primary care practices. Health care quality is associated with organizational factors, but their effect is understudied in pediatric care. This study aimed to develop hypotheses regarding the relationship between organizational factors and composite scores on pediatric quality measures. METHODS: Using a positive deviance approach, semistructured interviews were conducted with pediatricians and staff (N = 35) at 10 purposively selected high-performing pediatric primary care practices in Massachusetts between September and December 2016. Practices were sampled to achieve diversity in geographic location, size, and organizational structure. Interviews aimed to identify organizational strategies (eg, care processes) and contextual factors (eg, teamwork) that may be associated with performance on quality measures. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative content analytic methods. RESULTS: We identified 4 major themes (MTs): MT1, Practice Culture; MT2, Practice Structures and Quality Improvement Tools; MT3, Attitudes and Beliefs Related to Measuring Care Quality; and MT4, Perceived Barriers to Achieving High Performance on Quality Measures. MT1 subthemes included contextual factors such as teamwork, leadership, and feeling respected as an employee. MT2 subthemes included fixed characteristics such as practice size and strategies such as the use of an electronic medical record. MT3 and MT4 subthemes linked these constructs to factors external to the practices. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that elements of organizational culture may play as important a role in the quality of care delivered as specific quality improvement strategies. Interventions to further test this relationship may aid practices seeking to improve the care they deliver.
Authors: Rita Mangione-Smith; Alison H DeCristofaro; Claude M Setodji; Joan Keesey; David J Klein; John L Adams; Mark A Schuster; Elizabeth A McGlynn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-10-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C J Homer; P Szilagyi; L Rodewald; S R Bloom; P Greenspan; S Yazdgerdi; J M Leventhal; D Finkelstein; J M Perrin Journal: Pediatrics Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Michael J Taylor; Chris McNicholas; Chris Nicolay; Ara Darzi; Derek Bell; Julie E Reed Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie A Curry; Shoba Ramanadhan; Laura Rowe; Ingrid M Nembhard; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2009-05-08 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Sarah L Goff; Kate Wallace; Natalia Putnam; Meghan Fernandes; Eva Chow; Marisa DaCosta; Kelsey Clary Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-03-15