Literature DB >> 31003616

The Role of Mutation Bias in Adaptive Evolution.

Erik I Svensson1, David Berger2.   

Abstract

Mutational input is the ultimate source of genetic variation, but mutations are not thought to affect the direction of adaptive evolution. Recently, critics of standard evolutionary theory have questioned the random and non-directional nature of mutations, claiming that the mutational process can be adaptive in its own right. We discuss here mutation bias in adaptive evolution. We find little support for mutation bias as an independent force in adaptive evolution, although it can interact with selection under conditions of small population size and when standing genetic variation is limited, entirely consistent with standard evolutionary theory. We further emphasize that natural selection can shape the phenotypic effects of mutations, giving the false impression that directed mutations are driving adaptive evolution.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31003616     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  17 in total

Review 1.  Correlational selection in the age of genomics.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger; Katalin Csilléry; Jeremy Draghi; Jonathan M Henshaw; Adam G Jones; Stephen De Lisle; David A Marques; Katrina McGuigan; Monique N Simon; Anna Runemark
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  Mutation bias can shape adaptation in large asexual populations experiencing clonal interference.

Authors:  Kevin Gomez; Jason Bertram; Joanna Masel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Population size mediates the contribution of high-rate and large-benefit mutations to parallel evolution.

Authors:  Martijn F Schenk; Mark P Zwart; Sungmin Hwang; Philip Ruelens; Edouard Severing; Joachim Krug; J Arjan G M de Visser
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 19.100

Review 4.  A Theoretical Framework for Evolutionary Cell Biology.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Bogi Trickovic
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  The contribution of mutation and selection to multivariate quantitative genetic variance in an outbred population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Robert J Dugand; J David Aguirre; Emma Hine; Mark W Blows; Katrina McGuigan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Elevated temperature increases genome-wide selection on de novo mutations.

Authors:  David Berger; Josefine Stångberg; Julian Baur; Richard J Walters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Genetic Basis of High-Pressure Tolerance of a Vibrio parahaemolyticus Mutant and Its Pathogenicity.

Authors:  Lifang Feng; Minhui Xu; Junli Zhu; Haixia Lu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Characterization and genomic analysis of a diesel-degrading bacterium, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus CA16, isolated from Canadian soil.

Authors:  Margaret T Ho; Michelle S M Li; Tim McDowell; Jacqueline MacDonald; Ze-Chun Yuan
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.563

9.  Loss of Heterozygosity and Base Mutation Rates Vary Among Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hybrid Strains.

Authors:  Ajith V Pankajam; Suman Dash; Asma Saifudeen; Abhishek Dutta; Koodali T Nishant
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Self-selection of evolutionary strategies: adaptive versus non-adaptive forces.

Authors:  Matthew Putnins; Ioannis P Androulakis
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.