| Literature DB >> 31003609 |
Fred A van Eeuwijk1, Daniela Bustos-Korts2, Emilie J Millet2, Martin P Boer2, Willem Kruijer2, Addie Thompson3, Marcos Malosetti2, Hiroyoshi Iwata4, Roberto Quiroz5, Christian Kuppe6, Onno Muller6, Konstantinos N Blazakis7, Kang Yu8, Francois Tardieu9, Scott C Chapman10.
Abstract
New types of phenotyping tools generate large amounts of data on many aspects of plant physiology and morphology with high spatial and temporal resolution. These new phenotyping data are potentially useful to improve understanding and prediction of complex traits, like yield, that are characterized by strong environmental context dependencies, i.e., genotype by environment interactions. For an evaluation of the utility of new phenotyping information, we will look at how this information can be incorporated in different classes of genotype-to-phenotype (G2P) models. G2P models predict phenotypic traits as functions of genotypic and environmental inputs. In the last decade, access to high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers (SNPs) and sequence information has boosted the development of a class of G2P models called genomic prediction models that predict phenotypes from genome wide marker profiles. The challenge now is to build G2P models that incorporate simultaneously extensive genomic information alongside with new phenotypic information. Beyond the modification of existing G2P models, new G2P paradigms are required. We present candidate G2P models for the integration of genomic and new phenotyping information and illustrate their use in examples. Special attention will be given to the modelling of genotype by environment interactions. The G2P models provide a framework for model based phenotyping and the evaluation of the utility of phenotyping information in the context of breeding programs.Keywords: Crop growth model; Genomic prediction; Genotype-by-environment-interaction; Genotype-to-phenotype model; Mixed model; Multi-environment model; Multi-trait model; Phenotyping; Phenotyping platform; Physiology; Plant breeding; Prediction; Reaction norm; Response surface; Statistical genetics
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 31003609 DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.06.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Sci ISSN: 0168-9452 Impact factor: 4.729