Literature DB >> 34791474

Can we harness digital technologies and physiology to hasten genetic gain in US maize breeding?

Christine H Diepenbrock1, Tom Tang2, Michael Jines3, Frank Technow4, Sara Lira2, Dean Podlich2, Mark Cooper5, Carlos Messina2.   

Abstract

Plant physiology can offer invaluable insights to accelerate genetic gain. However, translating physiological understanding into breeding decisions has been an ongoing and complex endeavor. Here we demonstrate an approach to leverage physiology and genomics to hasten crop improvement. A half-diallel maize (Zea mays) experiment resulting from crossing 9 elite inbreds was conducted at 17 locations in the USA corn belt and 6 locations at managed stress environments between 2017 and 2019 covering a range of water environments from 377 to 760 mm of evapotranspiration and family mean yields from 542 to 1,874 g m-2. Results from analyses of 35 families and 2,367 hybrids using crop growth models linked to whole-genome prediction (CGM-WGP) demonstrated that CGM-WGP offered a predictive accuracy advantage compared to BayesA for untested genotypes evaluated in untested environments (r = 0.43 versus r = 0.27). In contrast to WGP, CGMs can deal effectively with time-dependent interactions between a physiological process and the environment. To facilitate the selection/identification of traits for modeling yield, an algorithmic approach was introduced. The method was able to identify 4 out of 12 candidate traits known to explain yield variation in maize. The estimation of allelic and physiological values for each genotype using the CGM created in silico phenotypes (e.g. root elongation) and physiological hypotheses that could be tested within the breeding program in an iterative manner. Overall, the approach and results suggest a promising future to fully harness digital technologies, gap analysis, and physiological knowledge to hasten genetic gain by improving predictive skill and definition of breeding goals. © American Society of Plant Biologists 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34791474      PMCID: PMC8825268          DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  40 in total

1.  Coupling estimated effects of QTLs for physiological traits to a crop growth model: predicting yield variation among recombinant inbred lines in barley.

Authors:  X Yin; S D Chasalow; C J Dourleijn; P Stam; M J Kropff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  A selection strategy to accommodate genotype-by-environment interaction for grain yield of wheat: managed-environments for selection among genotypes.

Authors:  M Cooper; D R Woodruff; R L Eisemann; P S Brennan; I H Delacy
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 3.  Addressing Research Bottlenecks to Crop Productivity.

Authors:  Matthew Reynolds; Owen K Atkin; Malcolm Bennett; Mark Cooper; Ian C Dodd; M John Foulkes; Claus Frohberg; Graeme Hammer; Ian R Henderson; Bingru Huang; Viktor Korzun; Susan R McCouch; Carlos D Messina; Barry J Pogson; Gustavo A Slafer; Nicolas L Taylor; Peter E Wittich
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 4.  Steep, cheap and deep: an ideotype to optimize water and N acquisition by maize root systems.

Authors:  Jonathan P Lynch
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  The growth of vegetative and reproductive structures (leaves and silks) respond similarly to hydraulic cues in maize.

Authors:  Olivier Turc; Marie Bouteillé; Avan Fuad-Hassan; Claude Welcker; François Tardieu
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Spectral Phenotyping of Physiological and Anatomical Leaf Traits Related with Maize Water Status.

Authors:  Lorenzo Cotrozzi; Raquel Peron; Mitchell R Tuinstra; Michael V Mickelbart; John J Couture
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Soil water capture trends over 50 years of single-cross maize (Zea mays L.) breeding in the US corn-belt.

Authors:  Andres Reyes; Carlos D Messina; Graeme L Hammer; Lu Liu; Erik van Oosterom; Renee Lafitte; Mark Cooper
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 6.992

8.  Parent-progeny imputation from pooled samples for cost-efficient genotyping in plant breeding.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Justin Gerke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Modeling Illustrates That Genomic Selection Provides New Opportunities for Intercrop Breeding.

Authors:  Jon Bančič; Christian R Werner; R Chris Gaynor; Gregor Gorjanc; Damaris A Odeny; Henry F Ojulong; Ian K Dawson; Stephen P Hoad; John M Hickey
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 10.  Translating High-Throughput Phenotyping into Genetic Gain.

Authors:  José Luis Araus; Shawn C Kefauver; Mainassara Zaman-Allah; Mike S Olsen; Jill E Cairns
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 18.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.