| Literature DB >> 31003560 |
Xiaobo Liu1,2, Haixia Wu3,4, Yuhong Guo5,6, Dongsheng Ren7,8, Jun Yang9, Jing Li14, Ning Zhao11,12, Jimin Sun13, Jing Li14, Jun Wang15,16, Qiyong Liu17,18.
Abstract
Characterizing the breeding sites of Culex pipiens complex is of major importance for the control of West Nile disease and other related diseases. However, little information is available about the characteristics and associated factors of the breeding sites of the Cx. pipiens complex in Lhasa, a representative high-altitude region in Southwestern China. In this study, a cross-sectional study concerning the breeding site characteristics and associated factors of the Cx. pipiens complex was carried out in Lhasa, Tibet from 2013-2016. Chi-square analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were applied to identify the key factors associated with the presence of Cx. pipiens complex larvae. Using a standard dipping method, 184 water bodies were examined and Cx. pipiens complex larvae were observed in 36 (19.57%) of them. There were significant differences in the composition of Cx. pipiens complex larvae among the breeding site stability (χ2 = 19.08, p = 0.00) and presence or absence of predators (χ2 = 6.986, p = 0.008). Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that breeding site stability and presence or absence of predators were significantly associated with the presence of Cx. pipiens complex larvae in Chengguan District, Lhasa. Relatively permanent water bodies such as water bodies along river fringes, ponds and puddles, and water bodies with no predators should be paid more attention for future Cx. pipiens complex larvae abatement campaigns in Lhasa, China.Entities:
Keywords: Culex pipiens complex; Tibet; breeding characteristics; cross-sectional study; mosquito control
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31003560 PMCID: PMC6517927 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16081407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The research sites of this study.
Locations of positive larvae breeding sites in Lhasa, 2013–2016, Tibet.
| Year of investigation | Research sites | Direction from | No mosquito larvae | With mosquito larvae | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Zongjiaolukang Park | North | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Tibet Medical College | North | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Gesanghua Park | North | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Lalu Wetland | Northwest | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Potala Palace Square | South | 5 | 1 | 6 | |
| Tibet TV Station | West | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Jinniu Park | West | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Lhasa River Fringe | South | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Road Close to Lhasa River | South | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Jiacuo Community | West | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Xiashasu Community | East | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Bakuo Subdistrict | East | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Tibet Tax Collection Bureau | North | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Jiaerxi, Niangre | Northwest | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Lhasa River Fringe | South | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Fountain Close to Lhasa River | South | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Gesanghua Park | North | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
| Mingzhu Park | North | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| First Aid Call Center, Tibet People’s Hospital | North | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Potala Palace Square | South | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| 120 First Aid, Tibet | North | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Zongjiaolukang Park | North | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Gesanghua Park | North | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Zhaxi Community, Zhaxi Street | East | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Zaki Temple, Tibet | North | 8 | 0 | 8 | |
| Water Park, Sela North Road | North | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Shengcheng Park, Sela North Road | North | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Judicial Officer Hospital | North | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Lhasa City Environmental Protection Bureau North Suburb Transfer Station | North | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Lalu Community, Gongdelin Street | Northwest | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Lalu Wetland | Northwest | 8 | 0 | 8 | |
| Bakuo Neighborhood Committee | East | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
| Xiashasu Neighborhood Committee | East | 7 | 1 | 8 | |
| Danjielin Community, Bakuo Street | East | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Seladaguo Alley, Bakuo Street | East | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Langmamu, Bakuo Street | East | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Bakuo Community, Bakuo Street | East | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Raosai Community, Bakuo Street | East | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Bailin Community, Bakuo Street | East | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Lugu Community, Bakuo Street | East | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Lhasa River Fringe | South | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Yaowangshan Park | West | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Zongjiaolukang Park | North | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Yunzhong Park | Southwest | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Tongjian Community, Gamagongsang | East | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Najinglubei Community, Gamagongsang | East | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Luobulinka | West | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Ancient Architectural Art Company | East | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| The Lawn Outside, Luobulinka | west | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Construction Bank of China, Tibetan Branch | west | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Sichuan and Tibet Highway Monument | South | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Lhasa Riverside Park Artificial Lake | South | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Roadside of Lhasa Hotel | South | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Tibet Tax Collection Bureau | North | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Lalu Wetland | Northwest | 5 | 0 | 5 | |
| Gesanghua Park | North | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Ruyi Park | North | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Tianhai Household Goods Market | North | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Tibet Audit Office | North | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Mingzhu Park | North | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Tibet Medical College and Its Vicinity | North | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Zongjiaolukang Park | North | 5 | 0 | 5 | |
| Gold Cattle Park | West | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Figure 2Representative water bodies in Lhasa City, Tibet, P. R. China. (A) River fringe; (B) Pond (≥50 m2); (C) Puddle (<50 m2); (D) Irrigation/drainage ditch; (E) Containers; (F) Temporary ground pool; (G) Sewer/tube well; (H) Other.
The frequency and percent composition of the main characteristics of 184 potential mosquito breeding sites in Lhasa, Tibet.
| Variable 1 |
| % 3 | Variable 1 |
| % 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| River fringe | 8 | 4.3 | Permanent (≥2 weeks) | 104 | 56.5 |
| Pond (≥50 m2) | 38 | 20.7 | Temporary (<2 weeks) | 80 | 43.5 |
| Puddle (<50 m2) | 39 | 21.2 | Substrate types | ||
| Irrigation/drainage ditch | 14 | 7.6 | Cement/concrete | 79 | 42.9 |
| Container | 7 | 3.8 | Soil | 79 | 42.9 |
| Temporary ground pool | 21 | 11.4 | Metal | 3 | 1.6 |
| Footprint/tire mark | 4 | 2.2 | Ceramic | 2 | 1.1 |
| Sewer/tube well | 37 | 20.1 | Others | 21 | 11.4 |
| Others | 16 | 8.7 |
| ||
|
| No | 151 | 82.1 | ||
| <10 m | 61 | 33.2 | Yes | 33 | 17.9 |
| 10~100 m | 86 | 46.7 |
| ||
| >100 m | 37 | 20.1 | No | 133 | 72.3 |
|
| Yes | 51 | 27.7 | ||
| Artificial | 136 | 73.9 | |||
| Natural | 48 | 26.1 |
| ||
|
| No | 30 | 41.1 | ||
| Flow | 29 | 15.8 | Yes | 43 | 58.9 |
| Static | 155 | 84.2 |
| ||
|
| ≥0.5 m | 86 | 46.7 | ||
| <1 m | 16 | 8.7 | <0.5 m | 98 | 53.3 |
| 1~10 m | 80 | 43.5 |
| ||
| >10 m | 88 | 47.8 | <15.85 | 17 | 23.3 |
|
| 15.85~19.65 | 18 | 24.7 | ||
| <7.0600 | 11 | 15.1 | 19.65~22.30 | 24 | 32.9 |
| 7.0600~7.2650 | 17 | 23.3 | >22.30 | 14 | 19.2 |
| 7. 2650~7.3925 | 12 | 16.4 |
| ||
| >7.3925 | 33 | 45.2 | <7.495 | 21 | 28.8 |
|
| 7.495~19.77 | 24 | 32.9 | ||
| <5.71 | 25 | 34.2 | 19.77~95.9750 | 11 | 15.1 |
| 5.71~6.055 | 13 | 17.8 | >95.9750 | 17 | 23.3 |
| 6.055~6.44 | 23 | 31.5 |
| ||
| >6.44 | 12 | 16.4 | <171.4 | 16 | 21.9 |
|
| 171.40~198.6 | 11 | 15.1 | ||
| <84.475 | 15 | 20.5 | 198.6~247.25 | 14 | 19.2 |
| 84.475~98.75 | 11 | 15.1 | >247.25 | 32 | 43.8 |
| 98.75~121.775 | 13 | 17.8 |
| ||
| >121.775 | 34 | 46.6 | <3.535 | 30 | 41.1 |
|
| 3.535~5.025 | 19 | 26.0 | ||
| <0.08 | 18 | 24.7 | 5.025~5.7625 | 11 | 15.1 |
| 0.08~0.10 | 15 | 20.5 | >5.7625 | 13 | 17.8 |
| 0.10~0.135 | 11 | 15.1 | |||
| >0.135 | 29 | 39.7 |
1 Potential mosquito breeding sites classified based on the main characteristics (breeding site types, the location of water bodies, distance to the nearest household, perimeter, breeding site stability, substrate types, presence or absence of predators, vegetation, artificial or natural, flow or static, shade, water depth, pH, water temperature, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, soluble solids, conductivity, salinity, and resistance); 2 N refers to the number of each characteristic; 3 % refers to the percent composition of the components.
Positive parameters determining the presence of Culex pipiens complex larvae in water bodies in Lhasa by chi-square analysis.
| Variable | No Larvae | With Larvae | χ2 |
| Variable | No Larvae | With Larvae | χ2 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| River fringe | 5 | 3 | 8.718 | 0.367 | Permanent (≥2 weeks) | 72 | 32 | 19.08 | 0.00 |
| Pond (≥50 m2) | 33 | 5 | Temporary (<2 weeks) | 76 | 4 | ||||
| Puddle (<50 m2) | 27 | 12 |
| ||||||
| Irrigation/drainage ditch | 11 | 3 | Cement/concrete | 60 | 19 | ||||
| Container | 7 | 0 | Soil | 67 | 12 | ||||
| Temporary ground pool | 17 | 4 | Metal | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Footprints/tire marks | 4 | 0 | Ceramic | 2 | 0 | ||||
| Sewer/tube well | 31 | 6 | Others | 17 | 4 | ||||
| Others | 13 | 3 |
| ||||||
|
| No | 116 | 32 | 6.986 | 0.008 | ||||
| <10 m | 47 | 14 | 1.308 | 0.520 | Yes | 35 | 1 | ||
| 10~100 m | 69 | 17 |
| ||||||
| >100 m | 32 | 5 | No | 109 | 39 | 0.705 | 0.401 | ||
|
| Yes | 24 | 12 | ||||||
| Artificial | 108 | 28 | 0.347 | 0.556 | |||||
| Natural | 40 | 8 |
| ||||||
|
| No | 23 | 32 | 0.048 | 0.526 | ||||
| Flow | 24 | 5 | 0.118 | 0.731 | Yes | 7 | 11 | ||
| Static | 124 | 31 |
| ||||||
|
| ≥0.5 m | 71 | 15 | 0.463 | 0.496 | ||||
| <1 m | 15 | 1 | 2.244 | 0.326 | <0.5 m | 77 | 21 | ||
| 1~10 m | 62 | 18 |
| ||||||
| >10 m | 71 | 17 | <15.85 | 11 | 6 | 1.905 | 0.592 | ||
|
| 15.85~19.65 | 14 | 4 | ||||||
| <7.0600 | 7 | 4 | 3.110 | 0.375 | 19.65~22.30 | 18 | 6 | ||
| 7.0600~7.2650 | 12 | 5 | >22.30 | 12 | 2 | ||||
| 7. 2650~7.3925 | 8 | 4 |
| ||||||
| >7.3925 | 28 | 5 | <7.495 | 14 | 7 | 2.998 | 0.392 | ||
|
| 7.495~19.77 | 17 | 7 | ||||||
| <5.71 | 20 | 5 | 4.043 | 0.257 | 19.77~95.9750 | 10 | 1 | ||
| 5.71~6.055 | 7 | 6 | >95.9750 | 14 | 3 | ||||
| 6.055~6.44 | 18 | 5 |
| ||||||
| >6.44 | 10 | 2 | <171.4 | 11 | 5 | 4.906 | 0.179 | ||
|
| 171.40~198.6 | 10 | 1 | ||||||
| <84.475 | 10 | 5 | 2.327 | 0.507 | 198.6~247.25 | 8 | 6 | ||
| 84.475~98.75 | 10 | 1 | >247.25 | 26 | 6 | ||||
| 98.75~121.775 | 9 | 4 |
| ||||||
| >121.775 | 26 | 8 | <3.535 | 22 | 8 | 0.359 | 0.949 | ||
|
| 3.535~5.025 | 14 | 5 | ||||||
| <0.08 | 13 | 5 | 5.273 | 0.153 | 5.025~5.7625 | 9 | 2 | ||
| 0.08~0.10 | 14 | 1 | >5.7625 | 10 | 3 | ||||
| 0.10~0.135 | 6 | 5 | |||||||
| >0.135 | 22 | 7 |
Positive parameters determining the presence of Cx. pipiens complex larvae in water bodies in Lhasa by logistic regression analysis.
| Variables | B | S.E. | Walds | df | Sig | Exp(B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predator | −3.157 | 1.043 | 9.156 | 1 | 0.002 | 0.043 |
| Breeding site stability | −2.652 | 0.566 | 21.991 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.070 |
| Constant | 2.373 | 0.700 | 11.497 | 1 | 0.001 | 10.728 |
B refers to regression coefficient; S.E. refers to Std.Error; Walds refers to Wald test; df refers to degree of freedom; Sig refers to significance; Exp(B) refers to the exponent of B.