Literature DB >> 25898013

Culex torrentium Mosquito Role as Major Enzootic Vector Defined by Rate of Sindbis Virus Infection, Sweden, 2009.

Jenny C Hesson, Jenny Verner-Carlsson, Anders Larsson, Raija Ahmed, Åke Lundkvist, Jan O Lundström.   

Abstract

We isolated Sindbis virus (SINV) from the enzootic mosquito vectors Culex torrentium, Cx. pipiens, and Culiseta morsitans collected in an area of Sweden where SINV disease is endemic. The infection rate in Cx. torrentium mosquitoes was exceptionally high (36 infections/1,000 mosquitoes), defining Cx. torrentium as the main enzootic vector of SINV in Scandinavia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alphavirus; Culex; Europe; Sindbis virus; Sweden; arthritis; arthropod vector; enzootic; mosquitoborne; mosquitoes; vector-borne infections; viruses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25898013      PMCID: PMC4412225          DOI: 10.3201/eid2105.141577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


In Sweden, Finland, Russia, and South Africa, Sindbis virus (SINV; family Togaviridae, genus Alphavirus) is an etiologic agent for outbreaks of rash and long-lasting polyarthritis (). Ecologically, SINV is a zoonotic mosquitoborne virus that naturally circulates in bird populations but only incidentally infects humans (). Previous detections and isolations of SINV from field-collected mosquitoes identified the ornithophilic mosquitoes Culex pipiens/Cx. torrentium and Culiseta morsitans as possible enzootic vectors of SINV and the generalist mosquitoes Aedes cinereus and Ae. rossicus, which feed on birds and humans, as potential bridge vectors for transmission of the virus from viremic birds to humans (,; J.C. Hesson, J.O. Lundström, unpub. data). However, female Cx. torrentium and Cx. pipiens mosquitoes are morphologically indistinguishable, so all previous virus isolates from these species were from pools that may have contained both species. The distinction between Cx. torrentium and Cx. pipiens is necessary because vector competence experiments show great differences between the capacities of the 2 species to become infected with and to transmit SINV (,). Cx. torrentium is highly superior to Cx. pipiens as a vector of SINV in the laboratory (,), but the extent to which the 2 species are infected in nature is unclear. We determined the natural SINV infection rates (IRs) in Culex mosquitoes, which were identified by using a newly developed molecular method for reliable identification of Cx. torrentium and Cx. pipiens mosquitoes (). We also studied the simultaneous occurrence of SINV in Cs. morsitans mosquitoes.

The Study

Every 2 weeks during July 13–September 13, 2009, we collected adult female mosquitoes by using 35 miniature light traps from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA, USA) baited with carbon dioxide; the traps were set within the regular mosquito surveillance area of the River Dalälven floodplains in central Sweden (). Mosquitoes were kept cold on a chilled table during morphologic identification and stored at −80°C. Legs were removed from mosquitoes morphologically identified as Cx. pipiens/Cx. torrentium and used for DNA extraction, enabling identification of the individual specimens to species by using a previously described molecular method (). RNA was extracted from 668 mosquito bodies without legs (301 Cx. torrentium, 367 Cx. pipiens) and from 74 pools of mosquitoes pooled by collection trap and week (290 Cs. morsitans); pool sizes ranged from 1 to 19 mosquitoes. The mosquitoes were processed for RNA extraction, real-time reverse transcription PCR (rRT-PCR), and virus isolation on Vero cells as previously described (). First, all samples were screened by SINV rRT-PCR by pooling 2–10 RNA extractions by species and collection week. Of 81 total pools, 14 were positive for SINV RNA. Nine positive pools were from Cx. torrentium mosquitoes, and 3 and 2 pools, respectively, were from Cx. pipiens and Cs. morsitans mosquitoes. Second, all individual samples from the SINV-positive pools from the first screening were subjected to another rRT-PCR, so that individual (Culex) or smaller pools of (Culiseta) mosquitoes were ultimately tested for SINV RNA. The second rRT-PCR showed 16 samples positive for SINV RNA. One of the positive Cx. torrentium pools, which contained samples from 10 mosquitoes, included samples from 3 SINV RNA–positive mosquitoes. Thus, 11 of 301 individual Cx. torrentium and 3 of 367 individual Cx. pipiens mosquitoes were positive for SINV RNA. For Cs. morsitans mosquitoes, 2 of 74 pools were positive for SINV RNA (Table 1).
Table 1

Ornithophilic Culex and Culiseta spp. mosquitoes collected for the detection of Sindbis virus, central Sweden, 2009

Mosquito speciesNo. collected (no. from which Sindbis virus isolated)
TotalInfection estimates
Jul 14Jul 28 and 29Aug 11Aug 27Sep 8
Culex spp.
Cx. torrentium 45183 (6)62 (4)9 (1)2301(11)36.5†
Cx. pipiens 38134 (2)175 (1)137367 (3)8.2†
Total
83
317 (8)
237 (5)
22 (1)
9
668(14)
21.0†
Culiseta sp.
Cs. morsitans
8
35
93
111 (1)
43 (1)
290 (2)
6.9‡
Total91352 (8)330 (5)133 (2)52 (1)958 (16)NA

*NA, not applicable.
†Infection rate/1,000 mosquitoes.
‡Minimum field infection rate/1,000 mosquitoes.

*NA, not applicable.
†Infection rate/1,000 mosquitoes.
‡Minimum field infection rate/1,000 mosquitoes. Because individual Cx. torrentium and Cx. pipiens mosquitoes were tested, the IRs were calculated as (no. positive individual mosquitoes/total no. tested) × 1,000; differences between the species were tested for significance by using a χ2 test. The actual species-specific IR differed significantly between species (p = 0.01): 36.5, 8.2, and 21 infections/1,000 mosquitoes for Cx. torrentium, Cx. pipiens, and mixed species (Cx. pipiens and Cx. torrentium), respectively. Cs. morsitans mosquitoes were tested in pools, so we calculated the minimum IR (MIR) as (no. positive pools/total no. mosquitoes tested) × 1,000; the calculated MIR was 6.9 infections/1,000 Cs. morsitans mosquitoes. A comparison of MIR and maximum-likelihood estimates of infection gave similar estimates. SINV was successfully isolated from all 16 rRT-PCR–positive mosquito samples (Table 2). Part of the SINV E2 envelope glycoprotein gene was sequenced as previously described (). The phylogenetic analysis included all genomic sequences obtained in this study together with previously published sequences for 63 other virus strains (). The results showed that all new strains belonged to the SINV-I genotype and have close relationships with strains from Europe, the Middle East, and South Africa (Figure).
Table 2

Summary of 16 Sindbis virus isolates from ornithophilic Culex and Culiseta species mosquitoes collected in central Sweden, 2009

SpeciesDate collectedGeographic coordinatesNo. mosquitoesStrainGenBank accession no.
Cx. torrentium Jul 2860°10.141′N; 16°34.998′E109-M-526-3KF297644
Cx. torrentium Jul 2860°10.141′N; 16°34.998′E109-M-1393-3KF297639
Cx. torrentium Jul 2860°14.698′N; 16°43.592′E109-M-1388-17KF297643
Cx. torrentium Jul 2860°7.506′N; 16°46.828′E109-M-1384KF297637
Cx. torrentium Jul 2860°7.506′N; 16°46.828′E109-M-1394KF297640
Cx. torrentium Jul 2860°6.253′N; 16°45.091′E109-M-1396-1KF297641
Cx. torrentium Aug 1160°10.141′N; 16°34.998′E109-M-1367-3KF297638
Cx. torrentium Aug 1160°9.647′N; 16°30.977′E109-M-564-9KF297646
Cx. torrentium Aug 1160°9.647′N; 16°30.977′E109-M-571-40KF297636
Cx. torrentium Aug 1160°9.638′N; 16°54.428′E109-M-991-1KF297653
Cx. torrentium Aug 2760°26.076′N; 17°22.583′E109-M-358-5KF297651
Cx. pipiens Jul 2860°3.127′N; 16°43.320′E109-M-519-25KF297652
Cx. pipiens Jul 2960°17.846′N; 16°50.486′E109-M-648-2KF297647
Cx. pipiens Aug 1160°9.647′N; 16°30.977′E109-M-564-5KF297645
Cs. morsitans Aug 2560°10.141′N; 16°34.998′E409-M-1169KF297642
Cs. morsitans Sep 860°7.506′N; 16°46.828′E309-M-887KF297648
Figure

Consensus tree of the partial E2 envelope glycoprotein gene for Sindbis virus constructed by using MrBayes (http://mrbayes.sourceforge.net/). The phylogram includes 16 Sindbis virus strains isolated from mosquitoes collected in central Sweden during July 13–September 13, 2009, against a background of all Sindbis virus strains previously sequenced in the same region. The tree shows that all new strains are of the Sindbis-I virus genotype. Boldface indicates strains isolated during this study. Labels on right indicate Sindbis virus genotypes. Support values at nodes are Bayesian posterior probabilities/Garli maximum-likelihood bootstrap support. Nodes without support values have Bayesian posterior probability of <0.9, and branches are collapsed at 0.5 posterior probability. Scale bar represents average number of substitutions per site.

Consensus tree of the partial E2 envelope glycoprotein gene for Sindbis virus constructed by using MrBayes (http://mrbayes.sourceforge.net/). The phylogram includes 16 Sindbis virus strains isolated from mosquitoes collected in central Sweden during July 13–September 13, 2009, against a background of all Sindbis virus strains previously sequenced in the same region. The tree shows that all new strains are of the Sindbis-I virus genotype. Boldface indicates strains isolated during this study. Labels on right indicate Sindbis virus genotypes. Support values at nodes are Bayesian posterior probabilities/Garli maximum-likelihood bootstrap support. Nodes without support values have Bayesian posterior probability of <0.9, and branches are collapsed at 0.5 posterior probability. Scale bar represents average number of substitutions per site.

Conclusions

We describe information on the actual occurrence and IR of SINV-I in the enzootic mosquito vectors Cx. torrentium and Cx. pipiens, reliably identified to species level. The significantly higher SINV-I IR observed for field-caught Cx. torrentium than Cx. pipiens mosquitoes is a key addition to the previous findings of the extreme susceptibility of Cx. torrentium mosquitoes to SINV-I (). Experimental transmission studies showed that all infected Cx. torrentium mosquitoes could transmit the virus upon refeeding on a susceptible animal (). Thus, the observed natural IR of 36.5 infections/1,000 Cx. torrentium mosquitoes translates to 36.0 mosquitoes/1,000 being able to transmit SINV-I. In contrast, because only one third of infected Cx. pipiens mosquitoes can transmit SINV-I upon refeeding, the observed natural IR of 8.2 infections/1,000 Cx. pipiens mosquitoes translates to only 2.0 mosquitoes/1,000 being able to transmit the virus (). The observed SINV-I IRs are very high for both species, and the IR for Cx. torrentium is among the highest ever reported for mosquitoes. This could partly be attributed to the fact that single mosquitoes were analyzed, as compared with the more common technique of pooling. This higher IR would have remained undetected if only pooled mosquitoes were analyzed, even though our original pools consisted of only 10 individual mosquitoes. Cx. pipiens mosquitoes are generally considered a secondary enzootic vector of SINV because, as in Sweden, they are less frequently found infected in nature in South Africa, Israel, and Saudi Arabia, where Cx. univittatus mosquitoes are the main SINV vector (–). Because of the exceptionally high SINV IR for field-caught Cx. torrentium mosquitoes in Sweden, the outstanding vector competence results for the species in the laboratory (), and its status as the dominating Culex species in SINV-endemic areas of Europe (), Cx. torrentium can now be identified as the main enzootic vector of SINV-I in Scandinavia. In areas of Sweden and Finland where clinical SINV-I infections are most prevalent, Cx. torrentium mosquitoes account for >90% of the Cx. pipiens/Cx. torrentium population; in central Europe, where the virus is more uncommon in mosquitoes and no human cases have been observed, both species are equally common (–). Thus, a large population of Cx. torrentium mosquitoes may be a prerequisite for the intense enzootic transmission of SINV-I that is needed to increase the risk for spillover infections in humans. Whether the Cx. torrentium mosquitoes are also to be considered a vector of other mosquitoborne bird viruses remains to be investigated. In continental Europe, West Nile virus and Usutu virus are emerging, and it is unknown if Cx. torrentium has a vector role for these viruses is unknown because of the lack of transmission experiments and isolation attempts from reliably identified female Cx. pipiens/Cx. torrentium mosquitoes. Knowledge from such experiments and isolation attempts would be especially valuable for northern and central Europe where Cx. torrentium is the dominating candidate enzootic vector species for bird-associated viruses ().
  12 in total

1.  Isolation and phylogenetic analysis of Sindbis viruses from mosquitoes in Germany.

Authors:  Hanna Jöst; Alexandra Bialonski; Volker Storch; Stephan Günther; Norbert Becker; Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The arbovirus vector Culex torrentium is more prevalent than Culex pipiens in northern and central Europe.

Authors:  J C Hesson; F Rettich; E Merdić; G Vignjević; O Ostman; M Schäfer; F Schaffner; R Foussadier; G Besnard; J Medlock; E-J Scholte; J O Lundström
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.739

3.  Effect of environmental temperature on the vector competence of Culex pipiens and Cx. torrentium for Ockelbo virus.

Authors:  J O Lundström; M J Turell; B Niklasson
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Geographic distribution and relative abundance of the sibling vector species Culex torrentium and Culex pipiens in Sweden.

Authors:  Jenny C Hesson; Orjan Ostman; Martina Schäfer; Jan O Lundström
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.133

5.  A sensitive and reliable restriction enzyme assay to distinguish between the mosquitoes Culex torrentium and Culex pipiens.

Authors:  J C Hesson; J O Lundström; P Halvarsson; P Erixon; A Collado
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.739

6.  Ecologic studies of mosquitoes and birds as hosts of Ockelbo virus in Sweden and isolation of Inkoo and Batai viruses from mosquitoes.

Authors:  D B Francy; T G Jaenson; J O Lundström; E B Schildt; A Espmark; B Henriksson; B Niklasson
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.345

7.  Sindbis virus isolations from Saudi Arabian mosquitoes.

Authors:  W M Wills; W L Jakob; D B Francy; R E Oertley; E Anani; C H Calisher; T P Monath
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.184

8.  Isolation of viruses from mosquitoes of the Negev, Israel.

Authors:  I Samina; J Margalit; J Peleg
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.184

9.  Phylogeographic structure and evolutionary history of Sindbis virus.

Authors:  Jan O Lundström; Martin Pfeffer
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 2.133

10.  Swedish Culex torrentium and Cx. pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) as experimental vectors of Ockelbo virus.

Authors:  J O Lundström; B Niklasson; D B Francy
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.278

View more
  21 in total

1.  Blood-feeding ecology of mosquitoes in two zoological gardens in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Arturo Hernandez-Colina; Merit Gonzalez-Olvera; Emily Lomax; Freya Townsend; Amber Maddox; Jenny C Hesson; Kenneth Sherlock; Dawn Ward; Lindsay Eckley; Mark Vercoe; Javier Lopez; Matthew Baylis
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.876

2.  Inkoo and Sindbis viruses in blood sucking insects, and a serological study for Inkoo virus in semi-domesticated Eurasian tundra reindeer in Norway.

Authors:  Ruchika Shakya; Morten Tryland; Rose Vikse; Javier Sánchez Romano; Kjetil Åsbakk; Ingebjørg H Nymo; Reidar Mehl; Magnus Evander; Clas Ahlm; Olli Vapalahti; Olivia Wesula Lwande; Niina Putkuri; Wenche Johansen; Arnulf Soleng; Kristin S Edgar; Åshild K Andreassen
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 5.913

3.  First report on human-biting Culex pipiens in Sweden.

Authors:  Jenny C Hesson; Martina Schäfer; Jan O Lundström
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Culex pipiens and Culex torrentium populations from Central Europe are susceptible to West Nile virus infection.

Authors:  Mayke Leggewie; Marlis Badusche; Martin Rudolf; Stephanie Jansen; Jessica Börstler; Ralf Krumkamp; Katrin Huber; Andreas Krüger; Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit; Egbert Tannich; Stefanie C Becker
Journal:  One Health       Date:  2016-04-20

5.  Blood-feeding patterns of native mosquitoes and insights into their potential role as pathogen vectors in the Thames estuary region of the United Kingdom.

Authors:  V A Brugman; L M Hernández-Triana; M E England; J M Medlock; P P C Mertens; J G Logan; A J Wilson; A R Fooks; N Johnson; S Carpenter
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Predicting Spatial Patterns of Sindbis Virus (SINV) Infection Risk in Finland Using Vector, Host and Environmental Data.

Authors:  Ruut Uusitalo; Mika Siljander; C Lorna Culverwell; Guy Hendrickx; Andreas Lindén; Timothée Dub; Juha Aalto; Jussi Sane; Cedric Marsboom; Maija T Suvanto; Andrea Vajda; Hilppa Gregow; Essi M Korhonen; Eili Huhtamo; Petri Pellikka; Olli Vapalahti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Host-feeding patterns of mosquito species in Germany.

Authors:  Jessica Börstler; Hanna Jöst; Rolf Garms; Andreas Krüger; Egbert Tannich; Norbert Becker; Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit; Renke Lühken
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Temporal Variation in Sindbis Virus Antibody Prevalence in Bird Hosts in an Endemic Area in Sweden.

Authors:  Jenny Christina Hesson; Jan O Lundström; Atalay Tok; Örjan Östman; Åke Lundkvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Potential vectors of equine arboviruses in the UK.

Authors:  G E Chapman; D Archer; S Torr; T Solomon; M Baylis
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 10.  The Role of Culex pipiens L. (Diptera: Culicidae) in Virus Transmission in Europe.

Authors:  Victor A Brugman; Luis M Hernández-Triana; Jolyon M Medlock; Anthony R Fooks; Simon Carpenter; Nicholas Johnson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.