Literature DB >> 31001765

The Impact of Positron Range on PET Resolution, Evaluated with Phantoms and PHITS Monte Carlo Simulations for Conventional and Non-conventional Radionuclides.

L M Carter1, Adam Leon Kesner2, E C Pratt1,3, V A Sanders4, A V F Massicano5, C S Cutler4, S E Lapi5, Jason S Lewis6,7,8,9,10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The increasing interest and availability of non-standard positron-emitting radionuclides has heightened the relevance of radionuclide choice in the development and optimization of new positron emission tomography (PET) imaging procedures, both in preclinical research and clinical practice. Differences in achievable resolution arising from positron range can largely influence application suitability of each radionuclide, especially in small-ring preclinical PET where system blurring factors due to annihilation photon acollinearity and detector geometry are less significant. Some resolution degradation can be mitigated with appropriate range corrections implemented during image reconstruction, the quality of which is contingent on an accurate characterization of positron range. PROCEDURES: To address this need, we have characterized the positron range of several standard and non-standard PET radionuclides (As-72, F-18, Ga-68, Mn-52, Y-86, and Zr-89) through imaging of small-animal quality control phantoms on a benchmark preclinical PET scanner. Further, the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS v3.02) code was utilized for Monte Carlo modeling of positron range-dependent blurring effects.
RESULTS: Positron range kernels for each radionuclide were derived from simulation of point sources in ICRP reference tissues. PET resolution and quantitative accuracy afforded by various radionuclides in practicable imaging scenarios were characterized using a convolution-based method based on positron annihilation distributions obtained from PHITS. Our imaging and simulation results demonstrate the degradation of small animal PET resolution, and quantitative accuracy correlates with increasing positron energy; however, for a specific "benchmark" preclinical PET scanner and reconstruction workflow, these differences were observed to be minimal given radionuclides with average positron energies below ~ 400 keV.
CONCLUSION: Our measurements and simulations of the influence of positron range on PET resolution compare well with previous efforts documented in the literature and provide new data for several radionuclides in increasing clinical and preclinical use. The results will support current and future improvements in methods for positron range corrections in PET imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo simulation; PET; PHITS; Phantom; Point spread function; Positron range; Spatial resolution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31001765      PMCID: PMC6805144          DOI: 10.1007/s11307-019-01337-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  21 in total

1.  Positron flight in human tissues and its influence on PET image spatial resolution.

Authors:  Alejandro Sánchez-Crespo; Pedro Andreo; Stig A Larsson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Imaging quality of (44)Sc in comparison with five other PET radionuclides using Derenzo phantoms and preclinical PET.

Authors:  Maruta Bunka; Cristina Müller; Christiaan Vermeulen; Stephanie Haller; Andreas Türler; Roger Schibli; Nicholas P van der Meulen
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Digimouse: a 3D whole body mouse atlas from CT and cryosection data.

Authors:  Belma Dogdas; David Stout; Arion F Chatziioannou; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Positron follow-up in liquid water: I. A new Monte Carlo track-structure code.

Authors:  C Champion; C Le Loirec
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Positron range in tissue-equivalent materials: experimental microPET studies.

Authors:  H Alva-Sánchez; C Quintana-Bautista; A Martínez-Dávalos; M A Ávila-Rodríguez; M Rodríguez-Villafuerte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution.

Authors:  C S Levin; E J Hoffman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Positron ranges obtained from biomedically important positron-emitting radionuclides.

Authors:  Z H Cho; J K Chan; L Ericksson; M Singh; S Graham; N S MacDonald; Y Yano
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  89Zr-DFO-J591 for immunoPET of prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in vivo.

Authors:  Jason P Holland; Vadim Divilov; Neil H Bander; Peter M Smith-Jones; Steven M Larson; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  A pretargeting system for tumor PET imaging and radioimmunotherapy.

Authors:  Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré; Caroline Rousseau; Caroline Bodet-Milin; Eric Frampas; Alain Faivre-Chauvet; Aurore Rauscher; Robert M Sharkey; David M Goldenberg; Jean-François Chatal; Jacques Barbet
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Pretargeting of internalizing trastuzumab and cetuximab with a 18F-tetrazine tracer in xenograft models.

Authors:  Outi Keinänen; Kimberly Fung; Jacob Pourat; Vilma Jallinoja; Delphine Vivier; NagaVara Kishore Pillarsetty; Anu J Airaksinen; Jason S Lewis; Brian M Zeglis; Mirkka Sarparanta
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 3.138

View more
  9 in total

1.  The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiotracer 18F-DCFPyL detects tumor neovasculature in metastatic, advanced, radioiodine-refractory, differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Prasanna Santhanam; Jonathon Russell; Lisa M Rooper; Paul W Ladenson; Martin G Pomper; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-IV. Gynecologic and Genitourinary Malignancies.

Authors:  Ahmed Ebada Salem; Gabriel C Fine; Matthew F Covington; Bhasker R Koppula; Richard H Wiggins; John M Hoffman; Kathryn A Morton
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Expanding the PET radioisotope universe utilizing solid targets on small medical cyclotrons.

Authors:  K J H George; S Borjian; M C Cross; J W Hicks; P Schaffer; M S Kovacs
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 4.036

4.  The Legacy of the TTASAAN Report - Premature Conclusions and Forgotten Promises About SPECT Neuroimaging: A Review of Policy and Practice Part II.

Authors:  Dan G Pavel; Theodore A Henderson; Simon DeBruin; Philip F Cohen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Moving the goalposts while scoring-the dilemma posed by new PET technologies.

Authors:  Julian M M Rogasch; Ronald Boellaard; Lucy Pike; Peter Borchmann; Peter Johnson; Jürgen Wolf; Sally F Barrington; Carsten Kobe
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Implementation of a Spatially-Variant and Tissue-Dependent Positron Range Correction for PET/CT Imaging.

Authors:  Hunor Kertész; Thomas Beyer; Vladimir Panin; Walter Jentzen; Jacobo Cal-Gonzalez; Alexander Berger; Laszlo Papp; Peter L Kench; Deepak Bharkhada; Jorge Cabello; Maurizio Conti; Ivo Rausch
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Development of PHITS graphical user interface for simulation of positron emitting radioisotopes production in common biological materials during proton therapy.

Authors:  Mehrdad Shahmohammadi Beni; Kwan Ngok Yu; M Rafiqul Islam; Hiroshi Watabe
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Positron range in combination with point-spread-function correction: an evaluation of different implementations for [124I]-PET imaging.

Authors:  Hunor Kertész; Maurizio Conti; Vladimir Panin; Jorge Cabello; Deepak Bharkhada; Thomas Beyer; Laszlo Papp; Walter Jentzen; Jacobo Cal-Gonzalez; Joaquín L Herraiz; Alejandro López-Montes; Ivo Rausch
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-08-19

9.  Comparison of image quality and spatial resolution between 18F, 68Ga, and 64Cu phantom measurements using a digital Biograph Vision PET/CT.

Authors:  Anja Braune; Liane Oehme; Robert Freudenberg; Frank Hofheinz; Jörg van den Hoff; Jörg Kotzerke; Sebastian Hoberück
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-09-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.