Literature DB >> 31001651

Random gene sets in predicting survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Timo Itzel1, Rainer Spang2, Thorsten Maass3, Stefan Munker4, Stephanie Roessler5, Matthias P Ebert6, Hans J Schlitt7, Wolfgang Herr8, Matthias Evert9, Andreas Teufel10.   

Abstract

Despite multiple publications, molecular signatures predicting the course of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not yet been integrated into clinical routine decision-making. Given the diversity of published signatures, optimal number, best combinations, and benefit of functional associations of genes in prognostic signatures remain to be defined. We investigated a vast number of randomly chosen gene sets (varying between 1 and 10,000 genes) to encompass the full range of prognostic gene sets on 242 transcriptomic profiles of patients with HCC. Depending on the selected size, 4.7 to 23.5% of all random gene sets exhibit prognostic potential by separating patient subgroups with significantly diverse survival. This was further substantiated by investigating gene sets and signaling pathways also resulting in a comparable high number of significantly prognostic gene sets. However, combining multiple random gene sets using "swarm intelligence" resulted in a significantly improved predictability for approximately 63% of all patients. In these patients, approx. 70% of all random 50-gene containing gene sets resulted in equal and stable prediction of survival. For all other patients, a reliable prediction seems highly unlikely for any selected gene set. Using a machine learning and independent validation approach, we demonstrated a high reliability of random gene sets and swarm intelligence in HCC prognosis. Ultimately, these findings were validated in two independent patient cohorts and independent technical platforms (microarray, RNASeq). In conclusion, we demonstrate that using "swarm intelligence" of multiple gene sets for prognosis prediction may not only be superior but also more robust for predictive purposes. KEY MESSAGES: Molecular signatures predicting HCC have not yet been integrated into clinical routine Depending on the selected size, 4.7 to 23.5% of all random gene sets exhibit prognostic potential; independent of the technical platform (microarray, RNASeq) Using "swarm intelligence" resulted in a significantly improved predictability In these patients, approx. 70% of all random 50-gene containing gene sets resulted in equal and stable prediction of survival Overall, "swarm intelligence" is superior and more robust for predictive purposes in HCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioinformatics; Gene set; HCC; Liver cancer; Microarray; Profiling; Prognostic; RNA Seq; Random; Signature; Swarm intelligence; Transcriptome

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31001651     DOI: 10.1007/s00109-019-01764-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)        ISSN: 0946-2716            Impact factor:   4.599


  18 in total

1.  Expectations, validity, and reality in omics.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Genetics of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Andreas Teufel; Frank Staib; Stephan Kanzler; Arndt Weinmann; Henning Schulze-Bergkamen; Peter-R Galle
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  A novel prognostic subtype of human hepatocellular carcinoma derived from hepatic progenitor cells.

Authors:  Ju-Seog Lee; Jeonghoon Heo; Louis Libbrecht; In-Sun Chu; Pal Kaposi-Novak; Diego F Calvisi; Arsen Mikaelyan; Lewis R Roberts; Anthony J Demetris; Zongtang Sun; Frederik Nevens; Tania Roskams; Snorri S Thorgeirsson
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Novel insights in the genetics of HCC recurrence and advances in transcriptomic data integration.

Authors:  Andreas Teufel; Jens U Marquardt; Peter R Galle
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 5.  Expectations, validity, and reality in gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Kyoungmi Kim; Stanislav O Zakharkin; David B Allison
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Translating bioinformatics in oncology: guilt-by-profiling analysis and identification of KIF18B and CDCA3 as novel driver genes in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Timo Itzel; Peter Scholz; Thorsten Maass; Markus Krupp; Jens U Marquardt; Susanne Strand; Diana Becker; Frank Staib; Harald Binder; Stephanie Roessler; Xin Wei Wang; Snorri Thorgeirsson; Martina Müller; Peter R Galle; Andreas Teufel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Gene expression profiles predict complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  M Ayers; W F Symmans; J Stec; A I Damokosh; E Clark; K Hess; M Lecocke; J Metivier; D Booser; N Ibrahim; V Valero; M Royce; B Arun; G Whitman; J Ross; N Sneige; G N Hortobagyi; L Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing.

Authors:  Marco Gerlinger; Andrew J Rowan; Stuart Horswell; James Larkin; David Endesfelder; Eva Gronroos; Pierre Martinez; Nicholas Matthews; Aengus Stewart; Charles Swanton; M Math; Patrick Tarpey; Ignacio Varela; Benjamin Phillimore; Sharmin Begum; Neil Q McDonald; Adam Butler; David Jones; Keiran Raine; Calli Latimer; Claudio R Santos; Mahrokh Nohadani; Aron C Eklund; Bradley Spencer-Dene; Graham Clark; Lisa Pickering; Gordon Stamp; Martin Gore; Zoltan Szallasi; Julian Downward; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Using Big Data to Discover Diagnostics and Therapeutics for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases.

Authors:  Benjamin Wooden; Nicolas Goossens; Yujin Hoshida; Scott L Friedman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 33.883

10.  RTCGAToolbox: a new tool for exporting TCGA Firehose data.

Authors:  Mehmet Kemal Samur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Discovery and Opportunities With Integrative Analytics Using Multiple-Omics Data.

Authors:  Arjun P Athreya; Konstantinos N Lazaridis
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Downregulation of CRABP2 Inhibit the Tumorigenesis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma In Vivo and In Vitro.

Authors:  Qingmin Chen; Ludong Tan; Zhe Jin; Yahui Liu; Ze Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Associating Preoperative MRI Features and Gene Expression Signatures of Early-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Xiaoming Li; Lin Cheng; Chuanming Li; Xianling Hu; Xiaofei Hu; Liang Tan; Qing Li; Chen Liu; Jian Wang
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2021-06-21

4.  Deep View of HCC Gene Expression Signatures and Their Comparison with Other Cancers.

Authors:  Yuquan Qian; Timo Itzel; Matthias Ebert; Andreas Teufel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  A Gene Expression Signature to Select Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients for Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Hugo Pinto-Marques; Joana Cardoso; Sílvia Silva; João L Neto; Maria Gonçalves-Reis; Daniela Proença; Marta Mesquita; André Manso; Sara Carapeta; Mafalda Sobral; Antonio Figueiredo; Clara Rodrigues; Adelaide Milheiro; Ana Carvalho; Rui Perdigoto; Eduardo Barroso; José B Pereira-Leal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 13.787

6.  Data mining of the expression and regulatory role of BCAT1 in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Haifan Zou; Minjun Liao; Wentao Xu; Renzhi Yao; Weijia Liao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Construction of immune-related gene pairs signature to predict the overall survival of osteosarcoma patients.

Authors:  Long-Qing Li; Liang-Hao Zhang; Yan Zhang; Xin-Chang Lu; Yi Zhang; Yong-Kui Liu; Manhas Abdul Khader; Jia-Zhen Li
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.682

8.  Identification of an IRGP Signature to Predict Prognosis and Immunotherapeutic Efficiency in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Liang-Hao Zhang; Long-Qing Li; Yong-Hao Zhan; Zhao-Wei Zhu; Xue-Pei Zhang
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 9.  Prognostic Cancer Gene Expression Signatures: Current Status and Challenges.

Authors:  Yuquan Qian; Jimmy Daza; Timo Itzel; Johannes Betge; Tianzuo Zhan; Frederik Marmé; Andreas Teufel
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.600

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.