Literature DB >> 31000405

Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study.

Kevin M Denehy1, Sarag Abhari2, Viktor E Krebs3, Carlos A Higuera-Rueda4, Linsen T Samuel3, Assem A Sultan3, Michael A Mont5, Arthur L Malkani6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Highly porous metaphyseal cones have been introduced to restore metaphyseal integrity for improved cement interdigitation to achieve durable fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to review the survivorship, clinical results, and complications of revision TKA using highly porous 3-dimensionally printed titanium metaphyseal cones.
METHODS: This is a review of 62 revision TKAs using metaphyseal tibial cones, with 15 cases utilizing both tibial and femoral cones. The mean age of the patients was 66 years (range 32-84) who had a mean follow-up of 27 months (range 24-34). There were 38 women and 24 men, who had a mean body mass index of 33 (range 18.3-62).
RESULTS: Revision-free survival of the cones was 90.2%. If infection was excluded, survivorship was 100%. There were no cases of aseptic loosening. The mean Knee Society Score improved from 51 points preoperatively to 80 points at the time of latest follow-up. The mean Knee Society Functional Score improved from 48 points preoperatively to 68 points. A total of 15 of the 62 patients (24%) required additional surgery: 10 (16%) for infection, 3 (5%) for contracture, 1 for patellar subluxation, and 1 for quadriceps tendon rupture.
CONCLUSION: Metaphyseal fixation is important for survivorship in revision TKA which can be challenging due to cancellous and structural bone loss encountered at the time of revision. Prosthetic joint infection continues to be the leading cause of failure in revision TKA. The use of highly porous titanium metaphyseal cones produced from 3-dimensionally printed technology used in this study demonstrated excellent short-term results with no cases of aseptic loosening. Further follow-up is required to determine if these results can be durable over a longer period.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone loss; failed TKA; metaphyseal cone; revision TKA; titanium

Year:  2019        PMID: 31000405     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  14 in total

1.  Preliminary clinical results of coated porous tibia cones in septic and aseptic revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Malte Ohlmeier; Christian Lausmann; Matthias Wolff; Hussein Abdelaziz; Thorsten Gehrke; Mustafa Citak
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Medium term clinical outcomes of tibial cones in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Roger Erivan; Robert Tracey; Aurélien Mulliez; Guillaume Villatte; Wayne Paprosky
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Metaphyseal cones and sleeves are similar in improving short- and mid-term outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty revisions.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Sergio De Salvatore; Giovanni Intermesoli; Francesco Pirato; Ilaria Piergentili; Roland Becker; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Short-Term Survivorship of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fabio Mancino; Vincenzo Di Matteo; Fabrizio Mocini; Silvia Pietramala; Alessandro Singlitico; Andrea De Fazio; Vincenzo La Vergata; Giorgio Gasparini; Giulio Maccauro; Ivan De Martino
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-06-27

5.  Surgical Management of Tibial Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Analysis of Tantalum Cones, Titanium Cones and Titanium Sleeves.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Terrie Vasilopoulos; Edvinas Sipavicius; Justin T Deen; Hernan A Prieto; Chancellor F Gray; Hari K Parvataneni; Luis Pulido
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

6.  Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ittai Shichman; Christian Oakley; Jore H Willems; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Petra Heesterbeek; Joshua Rozell; Scott Marwin; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Additive manufacturing of porous titanium metaphyseal components: Early osseointegration and implant stability in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas England; Joseph Pagkalos; Lee Jeys; Rajesh Botchu; Richard Carey Smith
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-24

8.  Facing metaphyseal bone stock defects: Mid- and longterm results of cones.

Authors:  Stephanie Kirschbaum; Carsten Perka; Clemens Gwinner
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-12-23

9.  Metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty: The role of stems.

Authors:  Shuqiao Xie; Noel Conlisk; David Hamilton; Chloe Scott; Richard Burnett; Pankaj Pankaj
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  A prospective study on outcome of patient-specific cones in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexander A Cherny; Anton N Kovalenko; Taras A Kulyaba; Nikolai N Kornilov
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.