Literature DB >> 31000393

The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State of the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool at 1-Year Follow-Up of Hip-Preservation Surgery.

Benjamin R Kivlan1, RobRoy L Martin2, John J Christoforetti3, Andrew B Wolff4, Shane J Nho5, John P Salvo6, Thomas J Ellis7, Geoff Van Thiel8, Dean Matsuda9, Dominic S Carreira10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) cutoff score for the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for patients after hip-preservation surgery.
METHODS: A multicenter hip arthroscopy registry containing deidentified patient data was analyzed to discriminate patients who achieved satisfactory results from patients who did not. Patients eligible for inclusion in the study were between 18 and 75 years of age, consented to undergo elective hip arthroscopy, and completed preoperative patient-reported outcome questionnaires. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the PASS cutoff score for the iHOT-12 at 1 year after surgery based on the sensitivity and specificity of achieving satisfaction with surgery. A visual analog scale rating patient satisfaction 1 year after surgery was documented and compared between subjects who achieved the PASS score for the iHOT-12 and those who did not achieve it through an independent t test with an a priori α set at .05.
RESULTS: A total of 647 subjects (66% women) aged between 18 and 73 years (mean, 36.5 years; standard deviation [SD], 12.0 years) were included in the study. A cutoff score of 75.2 for the iHOT-12 yielded a sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.81. Satisfaction averaged 89.5% (SD, 18.0%) for the patients with iHOT-12 scores greater than the PASS cutoff score versus 60.9% (SD, 30.61%) for those who did not achieve the PASS iHOT-12 score.
CONCLUSIONS: The PASS cutoff score of 75.2 for the iHOT-12 establishes a "minimal" target score at which the patient is highly likely to be satisfied with the physical state of his or her hip joint at 1 year after hip arthroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.
Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31000393     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  11 in total

1.  The minimal clinically important difference for the nonarthritic hip score at 2-years following hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  David A Bloom; Daniel J Kaplan; David J Kirby; Daniel B Buchalter; Charles C Lin; Jordan W Fried; Nainisha Chintalapudi; Thomas Youm
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement is associated with significant improvement in early patient reported outcomes: analysis of 4963 cases from the UK non-arthroplasty registry (NAHR) dataset.

Authors:  Richard Holleyman; Mark Andrew Sohatee; Stephen Lyman; Ajay Malviya; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.114

3.  Symptom duration predicts inferior mid-term outcomes following hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Dominic S Carreira; Daniel B Shaw; Andrew B Wolff; John J Christoforetti; John P Salvo; Benjamin R Kivlan; Dean K Matsuda
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  Outcomes of arthroscopic management for pigmented villonodular synovitis of the hip.

Authors:  Hao-Che Tang; Mohammed Sadakah; Nils Wirries; Michael Dienst
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 2.928

5.  Full-Thickness Gluteus Medius Tears With or Without Concomitant Hip Arthroscopy: Minimum 2-Year Outcomes Using an Open Approach and Contemporary Tendon Repair Techniques.

Authors:  David R Maldonado; Shawn Annin; Jeffery W Chen; Philip J Rosinsky; Jacob Shapira; Ajay C Lall; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-07-10

6.  Correlation of the Single-Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Score With Hip-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Guillaume D Dumont; Rachel L Glenn; Nicole C Battle; Zachary T Thier
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-22

7.  Combined Transfer of the Gluteus Maximus and Tensor Fasciae Latae for Irreparable Gluteus Medius Tear Using Contemporary Techniques: Short-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  David R Maldonado; Shawn Annin; Jeffrey W Chen; Mitchell J Yelton; Jacob Shapira; Philip J Rosinsky; Ajay C Lall; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-11-25

8.  Defining the Patient Acceptable Symptom State Using the Forgotten Joint Score 12 After Hip Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Patrick G Robinson; Paul Gaston; Thomas R Williamson; Iain R Murray; Julian F Maempel; Conor S Rankin; Deborah J MacDonald; David F Hamilton
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-30

9.  Comparison of early outcomes of arthroscopic labral repair or debridement : a study using the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry dataset.

Authors:  Richard James Holleyman; Stephen Lyman; Marcus J K Bankes; Tim Nicholas Board; Jonathan Lee Conroy; Callum Wilson McBryde; Antonio Jose Andrade; Ajay Malviya; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-04

10.  Evaluation of the patient acceptable symptom state following hip arthroscopy using the 12 item international hip outcome tool.

Authors:  Patrick G Robinson; Julian F Maempel; Conor S Rankin; Paul Gaston; David F Hamilton
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.