Literature DB >> 35833961

Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement is associated with significant improvement in early patient reported outcomes: analysis of 4963 cases from the UK non-arthroplasty registry (NAHR) dataset.

Richard Holleyman1, Mark Andrew Sohatee2, Stephen Lyman3, Ajay Malviya2, Vikas Khanduja4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Results from recent randomised controlled trials demonstrate the superiority of surgery over physiotherapy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) of the hip in early follow-up. However, there is paucity of evidence regarding which factors influence outcomes of FAI surgery, particularly notable is the lack of information on the effect of impingement subtype (cam or pincer or mixed) on patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs). This study aims to evaluate the early outcomes of hip arthroscopy for FAI, and their determinants.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry (NAHR) of patients undergoing arthroscopic intervention for FAI between 2012 and 2019. The null hypothesis was that there is no difference in PROMs, based on morphological subtype of FAI treated or patient characteristics, at each follow-up timepoint. The outcome measures used for the study were the iHOT-12 score and the EQ5D Index and VAS 6- and 12-month follow-up.
RESULTS: A cohort of 4963 patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment of FAI were identified on the NAHR database. For all FAI pathology groups, there was significant improvement from pre-operative PROMs when compared to those at 6 and 12 months. Overall, two-thirds of patients achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), and almost half achieved substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for iHOT-12 by 12 months. Pre-operatively, and at 12-month follow-up, iHOT-12 scores were significantly poorer in the pincer group compared to the cam and mixed pathology groups (p < 0.01). Multivariable analysis revealed PROMS improvement in the setting of a higher-grade cartilage lesion.
CONCLUSION: This registry study demonstrates that hip arthroscopy is an effective surgical treatment for patients with symptomatic FAI and results in a statistically significant improvement in PROMs which are maintained through 12 months follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cohort; Femoroacetabular impingement; Hip; Hip arthroscopy; Hip surgery; Impingement; Outcomes; Registry

Year:  2022        PMID: 35833961     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07042-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.114


  58 in total

1.  Treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Gennaro Fiorentino; Alberto Fontanarosa; Riccardo Cepparulo; Alberto Guardoli; Luca Berni; Gianluca Coviello; Aldo Guardoli
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-11-03

Review 2.  Arthroscopic hip preservation surgery: current concepts and perspective.

Authors:  A Bedi; B T Kelly; V Khanduja
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Joint preservation after hip arthroscopy in patients with FAI. Prospective analysis with a minimum follow-up of seven years.

Authors:  Fernando Comba; Carlos Yacuzzi; Pablo J Ali; Gerardo Zanotti; Martin Buttaro; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-12-21

4.  Outcomes for Hip Arthroscopy According to Sex and Age: A Comparative Matched-Group Analysis.

Authors:  Rachel M Frank; Simon Lee; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Michael J Salata; Richard C Mather; Shane J Nho
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement With Capsular Management: Factors Associated With Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes.

Authors:  Gregory L Cvetanovich; Alexander E Weber; Benjamin D Kuhns; Jennifer Alter; Joshua D Harris; Richard C Mather; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy: A Prospective Analysis of 1038 Patients With 2-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Benjamin G Domb; Timothy J Martin; Chengcheng Gui; Sivashankar Chandrasekaran; Carlos Suarez-Ahedo; Parth Lodhia
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  J W Thomas Byrd; Kay S Jones
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  M Beck; M Kalhor; M Leunig; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-07

9.  Clinical Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy in Patients 60 or Older: A Minimum of 2-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Brian M Capogna; Michael K Ryan; John P Begly; Kristofer E Chenard; Siddharth A Mahure; Thomas Youm
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 10.  The management of labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement of the hip in the young, active patient.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Neal Chen; William Robertson; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.