Literature DB >> 30998951

Prediction and perception: Insights for (and from) tinnitus.

Jeffrey Hullfish1, William Sedley2, Sven Vanneste3.   

Abstract

More than 150 years have passed since Helmholtz first described perception as a process of unconscious inference about the causes of sensations. His ideas have since inspired a wealth of literature investigating the mechanisms underlying these inferences. In recent years, much of this work has converged on the notion that the brain is a hierarchical generative model of its environment that predicts sensations and updates itself based on prediction errors. Here, we build a case for modeling tinnitus from this perspective, i.e. predictive coding. We emphasize two key claims: (1) acute tinnitus reflects an increase in sensory precision in related frequency channels and (2) chronic tinnitus reflects a change in the brain's default prediction. We further discuss specific neural biomarkers that would constitute evidence for or against these claims. Finally, we explore the implications of our model for clinical intervention strategies. We conclude that predictive coding offers the basis for a unifying theory of cognitive neuroscience, which we demonstrate with several examples linking tinnitus to other lines of brain research.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active inference; Bayes; Belief; Inference; Learning; Perception; Phantom perception; Prediction error; Predictive coding; Tinnitus; Unsupervised learning

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30998951     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  10 in total

1.  Effect of Ipsilateral, Contralateral or Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients with Lateralized Tinnitus: A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Study.

Authors:  Yi Li; Yong-Cong Shen; John J Galvin; Ji-Sheng Liu; Duo-Duo Tao
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  Intrinsic Noise Improves Speech Recognition in a Computational Model of the Auditory Pathway.

Authors:  Achim Schilling; Richard Gerum; Claus Metzner; Andreas Maier; Patrick Krauss
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  The Neural Bases of Tinnitus: Lessons from Deafness and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Marlies Knipper; Pim van Dijk; Holger Schulze; Birgit Mazurek; Patrick Krauss; Verena Scheper; Athanasia Warnecke; Winfried Schlee; Kerstin Schwabe; Wibke Singer; Christoph Braun; Paul H Delano; Andreas J Fallgatter; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Grant D Searchfield; Matthias H J Munk; David M Baguley; Lukas Rüttiger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Why Is There No Cure for Tinnitus?

Authors:  Don J McFerran; David Stockdale; Ralph Holme; Charles H Large; David M Baguley
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Accounting for Heterogeneity: Mixed-Effects Models in Resting-State EEG Data in a Sample of Tinnitus Sufferers.

Authors:  Constanze Riha; Dominik Güntensperger; Tobias Kleinjung; Martin Meyer
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 6.  Cannabinoids, Inner Ear, Hearing, and Tinnitus: A Neuroimmunological Perspective.

Authors:  Paola Perin; Alex Mabou Tagne; Paolo Enrico; Franca Marino; Marco Cosentino; Roberto Pizzala; Cinzia Boselli
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 7.  Too Blind to See the Elephant? Why Neuroscientists Ought to Be Interested in Tinnitus.

Authors:  Marlies Knipper; Birgit Mazurek; Pim van Dijk; Holger Schulze
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-22

8.  The balance between Bayesian inference and default mode determines the generation of tinnitus from decreased auditory input: A volume entropy-based study.

Authors:  Jae-Jin Song; Jaemin Park; Ja-Won Koo; Sang-Yeon Lee; Sven Vanneste; Dirk De Ridder; Soonki Hong; Seonhee Lim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  Auditory thalamus dysfunction and pathophysiology in tinnitus: a predictive network hypothesis.

Authors:  Pia Brinkmann; Sonja A Kotz; Jasper V Smit; Marcus L F Janssen; Michael Schwartze
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 3.270

10.  Investigating functional changes in the brain to intermittently induced auditory illusions and its relevance to chronic tinnitus.

Authors:  Anusha Mohan; Neil Bhamoo; Juan S Riquelme; Samantha Long; Arnaud Norena; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.038

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.