Literature DB >> 3099588

Early total parenteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis: lack of beneficial effects.

H C Sax, B W Warner, M A Talamini, F N Hamilton, R H Bell, J E Fischer, R H Bower.   

Abstract

To determine the effect of early aggressive parenteral support in pancreatitis, 54 patients with acute pancreatitis were randomized to receive either conventional therapy (control group) or conventional therapy plus the institution of total parenteral nutrition within 24 hours. The two groups were similar demographically. The total parenteral nutrition group had a significantly higher rate of catheter-related sepsis than did an additional group of contemporaneous patients without pancreatitis who received total parental nutrition (10.5 percent and 1.47 percent, respectively; p less than 0.01). There was no advantage to the use of early total parenteral nutrition; that is, there was no difference in the number of days to oral intake, total hospital stay, or number of complications of pancreatitis. Patients with zero or one Ranson's criterion on admission were more likely to be eating by the seventh hospital day than were those with two or more Ranson's criteria (80 percent and 54 percent, respectively; p less than 0.05). The early institution of total parenteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis did not appear to improve the outcome. Its use should be limited to prolonged periods of no oral intake or treatment of a specific complication, such as a pseudocyst.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3099588     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(87)90211-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  24 in total

Review 1.  Is parenteral nutrition guilty?

Authors:  Peter Varga; Richard Griffiths; René Chiolero; Gérard Nitenberg; Xavier Leverve; Marek Pertkiewicz; Erich Roth; Jan Wernerman; Claude Pichard; Jean-Charles Preiser
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Current management of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Thomas E Clancy; Eric P Benoit; Stanley W Ashley
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Nutritional support in stroke: a balanced meal or a feast?

Authors:  John M Miles
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  No, the glycaemic target in the critically ill should not be < or = 6.1 mmol/l.

Authors:  J M Miles; M M McMahon; W L Isley
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 5.  Nutrition and acute pancreatitis: review of the literature and pediatric perspectives.

Authors:  Soma Kumar; Cheryl E Gariepy
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-08

6.  Consensus of primary care in acute pancreatitis in Japan.

Authors:  Makoto Otsuki; Masahiko Hirota; Shinju Arata; Masaru Koizumi; Shigeyuki Kawa; Terumi Kamisawa; Kazunori Takeda; Toshihiko Mayumi; Motoji Kitagawa; Tetsuhide Ito; Kazuo Inui; Tooru Shimosegawa; Shigeki Tanaka; Keisho Kataoka; Hiromitsu Saisho; Kazuichi Okazaki; Yosikazu Kuroda; Norio Sawabu; Yoshifumi Takeyama
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  [Nutritional therapy in acute pancreatitis].

Authors:  J Ockenga
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 0.840

8.  Parenteral nutrition use at a university hospital. Factors associated with inappropriate use.

Authors:  S J Katz; R K Oye
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-06

Review 9.  Nutritional support in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Neeraj Kaushik; Stephen J D O'Keefe
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2004-08

Review 10.  Gastroenterology - Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition, Chapter 15.

Authors:  R J Schulz; S C Bischoff; B Koletzko
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2009-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.