Literature DB >> 33671643

Effect of Short-Term Exposure to Supplemental Vibrotactile Kinesthetic Feedback on Goal-Directed Movements after Stroke: A Proof of Concept Case Series.

Giulia Ballardini1,2, Alexis Krueger2, Psiche Giannoni1, Lucio Marinelli3,4, Maura Casadio1,2, Robert A Scheidt2,5,6.   

Abstract

Many survivors of stroke have persistent somatosensory deficits on the contralesional side of their body. Non-invasive supplemental feedback of limb movement could enhance the accuracy and efficiency of actions involving the upper extremity, potentially improving quality of life after stroke. In this proof-of-concept study, we evaluated the feasibility and the immediate effects of providing supplemental kinesthetic feedback to stroke survivors, performing goal-directed actions with the contralesional arm. Three survivors of stroke in the chronic stage of recovery participated in experimental sessions wherein they performed reaching and stabilization tasks with the contralesional arm under different combinations of visual and vibrotactile feedback, which was induced on the ipsilesional arm. Movement kinematics were encoded by a vibrotactile feedback interface in two ways: state feedback-an optimal combination of hand position and velocity; and error feedback-the difference between the actual hand position and its instantaneous target. In each session we evaluated the feedback encoding scheme's immediate objective utility for improving motor performance as well as its perceived usefulness. All three participants improved their stabilization performance using at least one of the feedback encoding schemes within just one experimental session. Two of the participants also improved reaching performance with one or the other of the encoding schemes. Although the observed beneficial effects were modest in each participant, these preliminary findings show that supplemental vibrotactile kinesthetic feedback can be readily interpreted and exploited to improve reaching and object stabilizing actions performed with the contralesional arm after stroke. These short-term training results motivate a longer multisession training study using personalized vibrotactile feedback as a means to improve the accuracy and efficacy of contralesional arm actions after stroke.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biofeedback; haptic feedback; proprioception; reaching; stabilization

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33671643      PMCID: PMC7926783          DOI: 10.3390/s21041519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.847


  51 in total

1.  Effects of wrist tendon vibration on targeted upper-arm movements in poststroke hemiparesis.

Authors:  Megan O Conrad; Robert A Scheidt; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Separate adaptive mechanisms for controlling trajectory and final position in reaching.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Claude Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force.

Authors:  Uwe Proske; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Directional postural responses induced by vibrotactile stimulations applied to the torso.

Authors:  Beom-Chan Lee; Bernard J Martin; Kathleen H Sienko
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  In vivo validation of a system for haptic feedback of tool vibrations in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Karlin Bark; William McMahan; Austin Remington; Jamie Gewirtz; Alexei Wedmid; David I Lee; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L Demers; M Monette; Y Lapierre; D L Arnold; C Wolfson
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2002 Jan 10-Feb 15       Impact factor: 3.033

7.  Quantitative assessment of limb position sense following stroke.

Authors:  Sean P Dukelow; Troy M Herter; Kimberly D Moore; Mary Jo Demers; Janice I Glasgow; Stephen D Bagg; Kathleen E Norman; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 8.  The effectiveness of proprioceptive training for improving motor function: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua E Aman; Naveen Elangovan; I-Ling Yeh; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Evaluating the effects of delivering integrated kinesthetic and tactile cues to individuals with unilateral hemiparetic stroke during overground walking.

Authors:  Muhammad Raheel Afzal; Sanghun Pyo; Min-Kyun Oh; Young Sook Park; Jungwon Yoon
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Effect of Tendon Vibration on Hemiparetic Arm Stability in Unstable Workspaces.

Authors:  Megan O Conrad; Bani Gadhoke; Robert A Scheidt; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Vibrotactile Perception for Sensorimotor Augmentation: Perceptual Discrimination of Vibrotactile Stimuli Induced by Low-Cost Eccentric Rotating Mass Motors at Different Body Locations in Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults.

Authors:  Ella Pomplun; Ashiya Thomas; Erin Corrigan; Valay A Shah; Leigh A Mrotek; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-07-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.