Literature DB >> 30995096

Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size.

Tomoaki Otani1,2, Makoto Hosono3, Mitsunori Kanagaki1, Yasuyuki Onishi1, Naoko Matsubara1, Kazuna Kawabata1, Hiroyuki Kimura1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to characterize the Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithm in comparison with an ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction algorithm and to determine its optimal penalization factor (expressed as a beta value) for clinical use. MATERIALS AND METHODS. FDG PET/CT scans of 46 patients with lung cancer were reconstructed using OSEM and BPL with beta values of 200, 300, 400, 500, and 1000. The liver signal-to-noise ratio, mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) of the liver, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and SUVmean of the cancers were measured. Tumors were categorized into three size groups, and the percentage difference in the tumor SUVmax between OSEM and BPL with a beta value of 200 as well as the percentage difference in the SUVmax between BPL with a beta value of 200 and BPL with a beta value of 1000 were calculated. Image quality was assessed by visual scoring. RESULTS. BPL showed a significantly higher liver signal-to-noise ratio than OSEM, except for BPL with a beta value of 200. The liver SUVmean showed no statistical difference among all algorithms. The SUVmax and SUVmean of tumors decreased as the beta value increased. BPL with a beta value of 200 produced a significantly higher tumor SUVmax than did OSEM (p < 0.01), and BPL with a beta value of 400, 500, or 1000 produced a significantly lower tumor SUVmax than did OSEM (p < 0.01). Visual analysis showed the highest and lowest scores for BPL with beta values of 500 and 200, respectively. In the small size group, the percentage difference in the SUVmax between OSEM and BPL with a beta value of 200 and the percentage difference in the SUVmax between BPL with a beta value of 200 and BPL with a beta value of 1000 were significantly larger than that in the other size groups (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION. The BPL algorithm improves image quality without compromising image quantification. A beta value of 500 appeared to be optimal in this study. Smaller tumors were more influenced by BPL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian penalized likelihood; PET; Q.Clear; image reconstruction

Year:  2019        PMID: 30995096     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.18.20478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  10 in total

Review 1.  Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation.

Authors:  Julian M M Rogasch; Frank Hofheinz; Lutz van Heek; Conrad-Amadeus Voltin; Ronald Boellaard; Carsten Kobe
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10

2.  Bias evaluation and reduction in 3D OP-OSEM reconstruction in dynamic equilibrium PET studies with 11C-labeled for binding potential analysis.

Authors:  Cláudia Régio Brambilla; Jürgen Scheins; Ahlam Issa; Lutz Tellmann; Hans Herzog; Elena Rota Kops; N Jon Shah; Irene Neuner; Christoph W Lerche
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Moving the goalposts while scoring-the dilemma posed by new PET technologies.

Authors:  Julian M M Rogasch; Ronald Boellaard; Lucy Pike; Peter Borchmann; Peter Johnson; Jürgen Wolf; Sally F Barrington; Carsten Kobe
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  The effect of Q.Clear reconstruction on quantification and spatial resolution of 18F-FDG PET in simultaneous PET/MR.

Authors:  Defeng Tian; Hongwei Yang; Yan Li; Bixiao Cui; Jie Lu
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-01-10

5.  Effects of New Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm on Visualization and Quantification of Upper Abdominal Malignant Tumors in Clinical FDG PET/CT Examinations.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Fumihiko Soeda; Takashi Kamiya; Junpei Ueda; Daisuke Katayama; Keiko Matsunaga; Tadashi Watabe; Hiroki Kato; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Changes of [18F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors.

Authors:  Yao Liu; Mei-Jia Gao; Jie Zhou; Fan Du; Liang Chen; Zhong-Ke Huang; Ji-Bo Hu; Cen Lou
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Small lesion depiction and quantification accuracy of oncological 18F-FDG PET/CT with small voxel and Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Ru-Shuai Li; Run-Ze Wu; Rui Yang; Qin-Qin You; Xiao-Chen Yao; Hui-Fang Xie; Yang Lv; Yun Dong; Feng Wang; Qing-Le Meng
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-03-26

8.  Impact of the Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear®) in comparison with the OSEM reconstruction on low contrast PET hypoxic images.

Authors:  Edgar Texte; Pierrick Gouel; Sébastien Thureau; Justine Lequesne; Bertrand Barres; Agathe Edet-Sanson; Pierre Decazes; Pierre Vera; Sébastien Hapdey
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-05-12

9.  Ordered subset expectation maximisation vs Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction algorithm in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT.

Authors:  Ewa Witkowska-Patena; Anna Budzyńska; Agnieszka Giżewska; Mirosław Dziuk; Agata Walęcka-Mazur
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 10.  Cumulative radiation doses from recurrent PET-CT examinations.

Authors:  Makoto Hosono; Mamoru Takenaka; Hajime Monzen; Mikoto Tamura; Masatoshi Kudo; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.629

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.