Literature DB >> 30994250

Rats bred for high anxiety exhibit distinct fear-related coping behavior, hippocampal physiology, and synaptic plasticity-related gene expression.

Allie J Widman1, Joshua L Cohen2, Chelsea R McCoy3, Keaton A Unroe3,4, Matthew E Glover3, Anas U Khan1, Teruko Bredemann1, Lori L McMahon1, Sarah M Clinton3.   

Abstract

The hippocampus is essential for learning and memory but also regulates emotional behavior. We previously identified the hippocampus as a major brain region that differs in rats bred for emotionality differences. Rats bred for low novelty response (LRs) exhibit high levels of anxiety- and depression-like behavior compared to high novelty responder (HR) rats. Manipulating the hippocampus of high-anxiety LR rats improves their behavior, although no work to date has examined possible HR/LR differences in hippocampal synaptic physiology. Thus, the current study examined hippocampal slice electrophysiology, dendritic spine density, and transcriptome profiling in HR/LR hippocampus, and compared performance on three hippocampus-dependent tasks: The Morris water maze, contextual fear conditioning, and active avoidance. Our physiology experiments revealed increased long-term potentiation (LTP) at CA3-CA1 synapses in HR versus LR hippocampus, and Golgi analysis found an increased number of dendritic spines in basal layer of CA1 pyramidal cells in HR versus LR rats. Transcriptome data revealed glutamate neurotransmission as the top functional pathway differing in the HR/LR hippocampus. Our behavioral experiments showed that HR/LR rats exhibit similar learning and memory capability in the Morris water maze, although the groups differed in fear-related tasks. LR rats displayed greater freezing behavior in the fear-conditioning task, and HR/LR rats adopted distinct behavioral strategies in the active avoidance task. In the active avoidance task, HRs avoided footshock stress by pressing a lever when presented with a warning cue; LR rats, on the other hand, waited until footshocks began before pressing the lever to stop them. Taken together, these findings concur with prior observations of HR rats generally exhibiting active stress coping behavior while LRs exhibit reactive coping. Overall, our current findings coupled with previous work suggest that HR/LR differences in stress reactivity and stress coping may derive, at least in part, from differences in the developing and adult hippocampus.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LTP; Morris water maze; active avoidance; fear conditioning; hippocampus

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30994250     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.23092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  4 in total

1.  Rodent models of stress and dendritic plasticity - Implications for psychopathology.

Authors:  M A Laine; R M Shansky
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2022-02-18

Review 2.  Modeling heritability of temperamental differences, stress reactivity, and risk for anxiety and depression: Relevance to research domain criteria (RDoC).

Authors:  Sarah M Clinton; Elizabeth A Shupe; Matthew E Glover; Keaton A Unroe; Chelsea R McCoy; Joshua L Cohen; Ilan A Kerman
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.698

3.  Quantifying defence cascade responses as indicators of pig affect and welfare using computer vision methods.

Authors:  Poppy Statham; Sion Hannuna; Samantha Jones; Neill Campbell; G Robert Colborne; William J Browne; Elizabeth S Paul; Michael Mendl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Brain Branched-Chain Amino Acids in Maple Syrup Urine Disease: Implications for Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Youseff Jakher; Rebecca C Ahrens-Nicklas
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.