Literature DB >> 33629390

Modeling heritability of temperamental differences, stress reactivity, and risk for anxiety and depression: Relevance to research domain criteria (RDoC).

Sarah M Clinton1, Elizabeth A Shupe1, Matthew E Glover1, Keaton A Unroe1, Chelsea R McCoy1, Joshua L Cohen2, Ilan A Kerman1,3.   

Abstract

Animal models provide important tools to study biological and environmental factors that shape brain function and behavior. These models can be effectively leveraged by drawing on concepts from the National Institute of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Initiative, which aims to delineate molecular pathways and neural circuits that underpin behavioral anomalies that transcend psychiatric conditions. To study factors that contribute to individual differences in emotionality and stress reactivity, our laboratory utilized Sprague-Dawley rats that were selectively bred for differences in novelty exploration. Selective breeding for low versus high locomotor response to novelty produced rat lines that differ in behavioral domains relevant to anxiety and depression, particularly the RDoC Negative Valence domains, including acute threat, potential threat, and loss. Bred Low Novelty Responder (LR) rats, relative to their High Responder (HR) counterparts, display high levels of behavioral inhibition, conditioned and unconditioned fear, avoidance, passive stress coping, anhedonia, and psychomotor retardation. The HR/LR traits are heritable, emerge in the first weeks of life, and appear to be driven by alterations in the developing amygdala and hippocampus. Epigenomic and transcriptomic profiling in the developing and adult HR/LR brain suggest that DNA methylation and microRNAs, as well as differences in monoaminergic transmission (dopamine and serotonin in particular), contribute to their distinct behavioral phenotypes. This work exemplifies ways that animal models such as the HR/LR rats can be effectively used to study neural and molecular factors driving emotional behavior, which may pave the way toward improved understanding the neurobiological mechanisms involved in emotional disorders.
© 2021 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amygdala; anhedonia; hippocampus; negative valence; passive coping; threat

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33629390      PMCID: PMC8382785          DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.698


  292 in total

1.  Maudsley reactive and nonreactive rats differ only in some tasks reflecting emotionality.

Authors:  D H Overstreet; A H Rezvani; D S Janowsky
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1992-07

Review 2.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  Hippocampal GR- and CB1-mediated mGluR5 differentially produces susceptibility and resilience to acute and chronic mild stress in rats.

Authors:  Hongli Sun; Rujuan Su; Xiaoxiao Zhang; Jun Wen; Dan Yao; Xinru Gao; Zhongliang Zhu; Hui Li
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Differential stress induced c-Fos expression and identification of region-specific miRNA-mRNA networks in the dorsal raphe and amygdala of high-responder/low-responder rats.

Authors:  Joshua L Cohen; Anooshah E Ata; Nateka L Jackson; Elizabeth J Rahn; Ryne C Ramaker; Sara Cooper; Ilan A Kerman; Sarah M Clinton
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Reduction of hypothalamic vasopressinergic hyperdrive contributes to clinically relevant behavioral and neuroendocrine effects of chronic paroxetine treatment in a psychopathological rat model.

Authors:  Martin E Keck; Tobias Welt; Marianne B Müller; Manfred Uhr; Frauke Ohl; Alexandra Wigger; Nicola Toschi; Florian Holsboer; Rainer Landgraf
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Pattern of forebrain activation in high novelty-seeking rats following aggressive encounter.

Authors:  Sarah M Clinton; Ilan A Kerman; Hailey R Orr; Tracy A Bedrosian; Antony D Abraham; Danielle N Simpson; Stanley J Watson; Huda Akil
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Novelty-seeking behavior predicts vulnerability in a rodent model of depression.

Authors:  Kristen A Stedenfeld; Sarah M Clinton; Ilan A Kerman; Huda Akil; Stanley J Watson; Alan F Sved
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-02-12

8.  Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse.

Authors:  Patrick O McGowan; Aya Sasaki; Ana C D'Alessio; Sergiy Dymov; Benoit Labonté; Moshe Szyf; Gustavo Turecki; Michael J Meaney
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 9.  Serotonin and stress coping.

Authors:  Stefano Puglisi-Allegra; Diego Andolina
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The 5-HT7 receptor: role in novel object discrimination and relation to novelty-seeking behavior.

Authors:  S J Ballaz; H Akil; S J Watson
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  2 in total

1.  Novelty-induced locomotor behavior predicts heroin addiction vulnerability in male, but not female, rats.

Authors:  Brittany N Kuhn; Nazzareno Cannella; Ayteria D Crow; Analyse T Roberts; Veronica Lunerti; Carter Allen; Rusty W Nall; Gary Hardiman; Leah C Solberg Woods; Dongjun Chung; Roberto Ciccocioppo; Peter W Kalivas
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.415

Review 2.  Convergent neural correlates of prenatal exposure to air pollution and behavioral phenotypes of risk for internalizing and externalizing problems: Potential biological and cognitive pathways.

Authors:  Amy E Margolis; Ran Liu; Vasco A Conceição; Bruce Ramphal; David Pagliaccio; Mariah L DeSerisy; Emily Koe; Ena Selmanovic; Amarelis Raudales; Nur Emanet; Aurabelle E Quinn; Beatrice Beebe; Brandon L Pearson; Julie B Herbstman; Virginia A Rauh; William P Fifer; Nathan A Fox; Frances A Champagne
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 9.052

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.