Literature DB >> 30993558

Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [68Ga]Citrate and [90Y]Microspheres PET Image Reconstructions Using Block Sequential Regularized Expectation Maximization Algorithm.

Youngho Seo1,2,3,4, Mohammad Mehdi Khalighi5,6, Kristen A Wangerin5, Timothy W Deller5, Yung-Hua Wang5, Salma Jivan7, Maureen P Kohi7, Rahul Aggarwal8, Robert R Flavell7,9, Spencer C Behr7, Michael J Evans7,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There are several important positron emission tomography (PET) imaging scenarios that require imaging with very low photon statistics, for which both quantitative accuracy and visual quality should not be neglected. For example, PET imaging with the low photon statistics is closely related to active efforts to significantly reduce radiation exposure from radiopharmaceuticals. We investigated two examples of low-count PET imaging: (a) imaging [90Y]microsphere radioembolization that suffers the very small positron emission fraction of Y-90's decay processes, and (b) cancer imaging with [68Ga]citrate with uptake time of 3-4 half-lives, necessary for visualizing tumors. In particular, we investigated a type of penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm, block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM), for improving both image quality and quantitative accuracy of these low-count PET imaging cases. PROCEDURES: The NEMA/IEC Body phantom filled with aqueous solution of Y-90 or Ga-68 was scanned to mimic the low-count scenarios of corresponding patient data acquisitions on a time-of-flight (TOF) PET/magnetic resonance imaging system. Contrast recovery, background variation, and signal-to-noise ratio were evaluated in different sets of count densities using both conventional TOF ordered subset expectation (TOF-OSEM) and TOF-BSREM algorithms. The regularization parameter, beta, in BSREM that controls the tradeoff between image noise and resolution was evaluated to find a value for improved confidence in image interpretation. Visual quality assessment of the images obtained from patients administered with [68Ga]citrate (n = 6) was performed. We also made preliminary visual image quality assessment for one patient with [90Y]microspheres. In Y-90 imaging, the effect of 511-keV energy window selection for minimizing the number of random events was also evaluated.
RESULTS: Quantitatively, phantom images reconstructed with TOF-BSREM showed improved contrast recovery, background variation, and signal-to-noise ratio values over images reconstructed with TOF-OSEM. Both phantom and patient studies of delayed imaging of [68Ga]citrate show that TOF-BSREM with beta = 500 gives the best tradeoff between image noise and image resolution based on visual assessment by the readers. The NEMA-IQ phantom study with [90Y]microspheres shows that the narrow energy window (460-562 keV) recovers activity concentrations in small spheres better than the regular energy window (425-650 keV) with the beta value of 2000 using the TOF-BSREM algorithm. For the images obtained from patients with [68Ga]citrate using TOF-BSREM with beta = 500, the visual analogue scale (VAS) was improved by 17 % and the Likert score was increased by 1 point on average, both in comparison to corresponding scores for images reconstructed using TOF-OSEM.
CONCLUSION: Our investigation shows that the TOF-BSREM algorithm improves the image quality and quantitative accuracy in low-count PET imaging scenarios. However, the beta value in this algorithm needed to be adjusted for each radiopharmaceutical and counting statistics at the time of scans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BSREM; Low-count PET; PET; PET/MRI; Regularized EM; [68Ga]citrate; [90Y]microspheres

Year:  2020        PMID: 30993558      PMCID: PMC6800603          DOI: 10.1007/s11307-019-01347-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  25 in total

1.  A retrospective evaluation of radiation dose associated with low dose FDG protocols in whole-body PET/CT.

Authors:  Kathy P Willowson; Elizabeth A Bailey; Dale L Bailey
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 1.430

2.  Quantitative comparison of OSEM and penalized likelihood image reconstruction using relative difference penalties for clinical PET.

Authors:  Sangtae Ahn; Steven G Ross; Evren Asma; Jun Miao; Xiao Jin; Lishui Cheng; Scott D Wollenweber; Ravindra M Manjeshwar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Clinical Evaluation of PET Image Quality as a Function of Acquisition Time in a New TOF-PET/MRI Compared to TOF-PET/CT--Initial Results.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Zeimpekis; Felipe Barbosa; Martin Hüllner; Edwin ter Voert; Helen Davison; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Gaspar Delso
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Simulation of Tracer Dose Reduction in 18F-FDG PET/MRI: Effects on Oncologic Reading, Image Quality, and Artifacts.

Authors:  Ferdinand Seith; Holger Schmidt; Julia Kunz; Thomas Küstner; Sergios Gatidis; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christian la Fougère; Nina Schwenzer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.

Authors:  Bert-Ram Sah; Paul Stolzmann; Gaspar Delso; Scott D Wollenweber; Martin Hüllner; Yahya A Hakami; Marcelo A Queiroz; Felipe de Galiza Barbosa; Gustav K von Schulthess; Carsten Pietsch; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.690

6.  Quantification accuracy of neuro-oncology PET data as a function of emission scan duration in PET/MR compared to PET/CT.

Authors:  Stefan Wampl; Ivo Rausch; Tatjana Traub-Weidinger; Thomas Beyer; Martin Gröschl; Jacobo Cal-González
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Bias in iterative reconstruction of low-statistics PET data: benefits of a resolution model.

Authors:  M D Walker; M-C Asselin; P J Julyan; M Feldmann; P S Talbot; T Jones; J C Matthews
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Optimization of Image Reconstruction for 90Y Selective Internal Radiotherapy on a Lutetium Yttrium Orthosilicate PET/CT System Using a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm.

Authors:  Lisa M Rowley; Kevin M Bradley; Philip Boardman; Aida Hallam; Daniel R McGowan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  A Comparison of Techniques for (90)Y PET/CT Image-Based Dosimetry Following Radioembolization with Resin Microspheres.

Authors:  Alexander S Pasciak; Austin C Bourgeois; Yong C Bradley
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Quantitative performance and optimal regularization parameter in block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstructions in clinical 68Ga-PSMA PET/MR.

Authors:  Edwin E G W Ter Voert; Urs J Muehlematter; Gaspar Delso; Daniele A Pizzuto; Julian Müller; Hannes W Nagel; Irene A Burger
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.138

View more
  5 in total

1.  Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia With Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Jae Ho Sohn; Spencer C Behr; Miguel Hernandez Pampaloni; Youngho Seo
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 5.528

2.  Moving the goalposts while scoring-the dilemma posed by new PET technologies.

Authors:  Julian M M Rogasch; Ronald Boellaard; Lucy Pike; Peter Borchmann; Peter Johnson; Jürgen Wolf; Sally F Barrington; Carsten Kobe
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Effects of New Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm on Visualization and Quantification of Upper Abdominal Malignant Tumors in Clinical FDG PET/CT Examinations.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Fumihiko Soeda; Takashi Kamiya; Junpei Ueda; Daisuke Katayama; Keiko Matsunaga; Tadashi Watabe; Hiroki Kato; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Yttrium-90 quantitative phantom study using digital photon counting PET.

Authors:  Joey Labour; Philippe Boissard; David Sarrut; Jean-Noël Badel; Thomas Baudier; Fouzi Khayi; David Kryza; Pascale Veyrat Durebex; Sandrine Parisse-Di Martino; Thomas Mognetti
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-07-27

5.  New PET technologies - embracing progress and pushing the limits.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Charline Lasnon; Adam Kesner; Craig S Levin; Irene Buvat; Andrei Iagaru; Ken Hermann; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry; Kevin M Bradley; Daniel R McGowan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 9.236

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.