| Literature DB >> 30993091 |
Soo In Choi1, Nayoung Kim1,2, Sun Min Lee1, Ryoung Hee Nam1, So Ra Kang1, Chin-Hee Song1, Young-Tae Park3,4, Huitae Min3, Yeon-Ran Kim3, Yeong-Jae Seok3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-fat diet is known to be implicated in the pathogenesis of various metabolic disorders related to an inflammatory response. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of high-fat diet for intestinal acetic acid and butyric acid concentrations which are related to inflammation-associated colon cancer risk.Entities:
Keywords: Acetic acid; Butyric acid; High-fat diets; Rats
Year: 2019 PMID: 30993091 PMCID: PMC6453582 DOI: 10.15430/JCP.2019.24.1.20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer Prev ISSN: 2288-3649
Figure 1Body weight gain (%) (A) and calorie intake (kcal/d/rat) (B) at the end of the 8-week feeding period compared with the start of the period. Calorie intake adjusted from daily food intake of each food. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; P-values to Kruskal–Wallis test are designated on the figure. CD, chow diet; HFD, high-fat diet.
Figure 2Ileal acetic acid concentration (mg/g) of male (A) and female (B) rats. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; P-values to Kruskal–Wallis test are designated on the figure; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ns: not significant; representing statistical significance according to Mann–Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction. CD, chow diet; HFD, high-fat diet.
Acetic acid concentration of ileal and cecal lumen contents
| Sex | Age (wk) | Diet | Number of samples | Ileum | Cecum | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| Mean (mg/g) | SEM | Mean (mg/g) | SEM | ||||
| Male | 6 | Chow | 8 | 8.42 | 2.82 | 4.53 | 0.82 |
| High-fat | 5 | 27.13 | 4.26 | 5.60 | 0.87 | ||
| 31 | Chow | 7 | 6.92 | 2.14 | 2.76 | 0.96 | |
| High-fat | 6 | 9.28 | 1.92 | 0.46 | 0.10 | ||
| 104 | Chow | 5 | 9.77 | 6.84 | 9.88 | 2.87 | |
| High-fat | 4 | 17.66 | 2.86 | 7.45 | 0.57 | ||
| Female | 6 | Chow | 8 | 18.58 | 5.54 | 9.07 | 2.65 |
| High-fat | 5 | 20.60 | 2.53 | 6.82 | 1.52 | ||
| 31 | Chow | 6 | 6.35 | 1.60 | 0.41 | 0.05 | |
| High-fat | 6 | 12.95 | 1.53 | 0.45 | 0.09 | ||
| 74 | Chow | 5 | 4.70 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 0.18 | |
| High-fat | 6 | 10.36 | 1.37 | 1.11 | 0.44 | ||
| 104 | Chow | 10 | 15.05 | 4.33 | 4.64 | 1.55 | |
| High-fat | 10 | 16.30 | 3.61 | 3.73 | 1.18 | ||
Figure 3Cecal butyric acid concentration (mg/g) of male (A) and female (B) rats. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; P-values to Kruskal–Wallis test are designated on the figure; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns: not significant; considered as statistical significance according to Mann–Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction. CD, chow diet; HFD, high-fat diet.
Butyric acid concentration of ileal and cecal lumen contents
| Sex | Age (wk) | Diet | Number of samples | Ileum | Cecum | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| Mean (mg/g) | SEM | Mean (mg/g) | SEM | ||||
| Male | 6 | Chow | 8 | 0.20 | 0.06 | 1.08 | 0.26 |
| High-fat | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| 31 | Chow | 7 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.21 | 0.07 | |
| High-fat | 6 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.02 | ||
| 104 | Chow | 5 | 0.54 | 0.35 | 1.08 | 0.50 | |
| High-fat | 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| Female | 6 | Chow | 8 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 1.38 | 0.34 |
| High-fat | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.02 | ||
| 31 | Chow | 6 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.06 | |
| High-fat | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.02 | ||
| 74 | Chow | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.04 | |
| High-fat | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.03 | ||
| 104 | Chow | 10 | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.51 | 0.16 | |
| High-fat | 10 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | ||