| Literature DB >> 30992077 |
Alex Ali Sayour1,2, Sevil Korkmaz-Icöz3, Sivakkanan Loganathan3, Mihály Ruppert3,4, Viktor Nabil Sayour5, Attila Oláh4, Kálmán Benke4, Maik Brune6, Rita Benkő7, Eszter Mária Horváth7, Matthias Karck3, Béla Merkely4, Tamás Radovits4, Gábor Szabó3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor canagliflozin has been shown to reduce major cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetic patients, with a pronounced decrease in hospitalization for heart failure (HF) especially in those with HF at baseline. These might indicate a potent direct cardioprotective effect, which is currently incompletely understood. We sought to characterize the cardiovascular effects of acute canagliflozin treatment in healthy and infarcted rat hearts.Entities:
Keywords: Canagliflozin; Cardioprotection; Myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury; Sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor
Year: 2019 PMID: 30992077 PMCID: PMC6469222 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-1881-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Fig. 1Measurement of myocardial infarct size and serum troponin-T. Myocardial infarct size of vehicle-treated (IRI, n = 7) and canagliflozin-treated (IRI + cana, n = 7) rats with myocardial infarction is depicted as percentage of area at risk. Area at risk (the area distal to the occlusion) is expressed as the percentage of the total ventricular area in each group. Serum troponin-T values of these groups are depicted. Student t-test P values are reported with ticked lines between two groups. cana canagliflozin, IRI ischemia–reperfusion injury
Fig. 2In vivo left ventricular (LV) pressure–volume (PV) analysis. a Heart rate values. b Preload-dependent LV contractility indices. c Representative PV loops from one representative animal of each group recorded during the transient occlusion of the inferior vena cava. d, f Preload-independent LV contractility indices. e, g Markers of LV diastolic function. h Indices of LV mechanoenergetics. The number of rats in each experimental group: sham + vehicle (n = 7); sham + canagliflozin (n = 7); IRI + vehicle (n = 9); IRI + canagliflozin (n = 10). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) P values (with factors: ischemia–reperfusion injury [PIRI] and canagliflozin treatment [PCANA]; and their interaction [Pint]) are depicted under the title of each graph for the given variable. Tukey’s post hoc P values are reported with ticked lines between two groups or as follows: *P < 0.05 versus sham + vehicle; $P < 0.05 versus IRI + vehicle. dP/dt maximal slope of systolic pressure increment; EDPVR end-diastolic PV relationship, ESPVR slope of the end-systolic PV relationship, IRI ischemia–reperfusion injury, Tau time constant of LV pressure decay
Fig. 3Effect of canagliflozin treatment on the phosphorylation of AMPK, ACC, eNOS and Akt. a Representative blots and quantification of phosphorylation of AMPK at the Thr172 activation site normalized to total AMPK expression. b Representative blots and quantification of phosphorylation of ACC at the AMPK specific Ser79 residue normalized to total ACC expression. c Representative blots and quantification of phosphorylation of eNOS at the Ser1177 residue normalized to total eNOS expression. d Representative blots and quantification of phosphorylation of Akt at the Ser473 residue normalized to total Akt expression. The number of rats in each experimental group: sham + vehicle (n = 7); sham + canagliflozin (n = 7); IRI + vehicle (n = 9); IRI + canagliflozin (n = 10). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) P values (with factors: ischemia–reperfusion injury [PIRI] and canagliflozin treatment [PCANA]; and their interaction [Pint]) are depicted under the title of each graph for the given variable. Tukey’s post hoc P values are reported as follows: *P < 0.05 versus sham + vehicle; $P < 0.05 versus IRI + vehicle. ACC acetyl-CoA carboxylase, AMPK adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase, eNOS endothelial nitric-oxide synthase
Fig. 4Effect of canagliflozin treatment on apoptotic and oxidative stress markers. a mRNA expression of Bax normalized to that of Bcl-2. Protein expression analysis depicts representative blots and quantification of Bax expression normalized to that of Bcl-2. b mRNA expression analysis of p47phox, SOD2 and catalase normalized to the housekeeping RPL27, respectively. c Quantification and representative sections of 4-hydroxynonenal (HNE) staining of the LV. The number of rats in each experimental group: sham + vehicle (n = 7); sham + canagliflozin (n = 7); IRI + vehicle (n = 9); IRI + canagliflozin (n = 10). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) P values (with factors: ischemia–reperfusion injury [PIRI] and canagliflozin treatment [PCANA]; and their interaction [Pint]) are depicted under the title of each graph for the given variable. Tukey’s post hoc P values are reported as follows: *P < 0.05 versus sham + vehicle; $P < 0.05 versus IRI + vehicle. Bax = B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2 associated protein x; Bcl2 B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2, p47 the 47 kDa subunit of the multiprotein complex nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase, SOD2 superoxide dismutase-2
Fig. 5Effect of canagliflozin on vasorelaxation. a End-systolic blood pressure and arterial elastance of vehicle-treated (sham + vehicle, n = 7) and canagliflozin-treated (sham + canagliflozin, n = 7) healthy (sham-operated) rats from the second part of the in vivo study. b Effect of canagliflozin on endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in healthy aortic rings in vitro (n = 10 aortic rings in each group). c Effect of canagliflozin on endothelium-independent vasorelaxation in healthy aortic rings in vitro (n = 10 aortic rings in each group). Student t-test P values are reported with ticked lines between two groups or as: *P < 0.05. ACh acetylcholine, cana canagliflozin, DMSO dimethyl sulfoxide, pD − logEC50, R maximal vasorelaxation, SNP sodium nitroprusside
Serum and urine parameters
|
| Sham + vehicle | Sham + canagliflozin | IRI + vehicle | IRI + canagliflozin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum glucose (mg/dL) | 215 ± 15 | 193 ± 10 | 205 ± 13 | 226 ± 17 |
| Urine glucose (mmol/L) | 0.54 ± 0.06 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | 0.44 ± 0.06 | 0.52 ± 0.04 |
| Serum creatine kinase (IU/L) | 1778 ± 247 | 1806 ± 346 | 3445 ± 436* | 3089 ± 477 |
| Serum lactate dehydrogenase (IU/L) | 961 ± 81 | 789 ± 41 | 3279 ± 259* | 2716 ± 242* |
| Serum aspartate transaminase (IU/L) | 217 ± 23 | 191 ± 10 | 899 ± 119* | 745 ± 91* |
| Serum alanine transaminase (IU/L) | 63 ± 4 | 57 ± 5 | 131 ± 11* | 114 ± 12* |
| Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L) | 268 ± 10 | 277 ± 13 | 273 ± 13 | 304 ± 15 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 79 ± 4 | 82 ± 4 | 78 ± 4 | 77 ± 2 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.47 ± 0.05 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.58 ± 0.08 | 0.55 ± 0.05 |
| Urinary urea nitrogen (g/dL) | 27 ± 5 | 26 ± 3 | 21 ± 4 | 20 ± 2 |
| Urinary creatinine (mg/dL) | 103 ± 9 | 115 ± 11 | 116 ± 12 | 99 ± 8 |
| Urinary albumin (mg/L) | 16 ± 3 | 13 ± 6 | 16 ± 4 | 15 ± 3 |
Canagliflozin did not alter serum and urine glucose levels in non-diabetic rats, and was not associated with hepatic or renal injury
To investigate intergroup differences, Tukey’s post hoc test was performed following two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). *P < 0.05 versus sham + vehicle; IRI ischemia–reperfusion injury