Albert Do1, Eric J Kuszewski2, Karl A Langberg1, Wajahat Z Mehal1,2. 1. Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 2. VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT.
Abstract
There is an urgent need for practical approaches to patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Total body weight loss (TBWL) is an important approach, as its effects are amplified in the liver, with 10% TBWL resulting in a 50% loss of liver triglycerides and improvement in all aspects of NASH histology. Lifestyle changes are the first step in addressing TBWL, but uncommonly result in the range required to improve liver histology in NASH (7%-10%). Weight loss medications (WLMs) are an effective additional tool because they can provide TBWL in the 7%-10% range, have a well-characterized clinical profile, have clear guidelines, and meet approved criteria for their use (body mass index greater than 27 kg/m2 ) for most NASH patients. Use of WLMs requires shared decision making with the patient, which hepatologists, due to their understanding of the natural history of NASH, are uniquely positioned to provide. WLMs do present the challenge of incorporating new medications into the hepatology clinic, but this will be necessary with all medications to manage NASH. WLMs provide a practical intervention that can be incorporated into hepatology clinics and can be offered to most NASH patients. NASH-specific medicines in clinical trials offer partial histological responses, and TBWL will likely enhance this. Conclusion: WLMs provide the hepatologist with effective and welcome clinical intervention beyond the diagnosis and staging of NASH and provide patients with a sense of empowerment about the treatment of their liver disease.
There is an urgent need for practical approaches to patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Total body weight loss (TBWL) is an important approach, as its effects are amplified in the liver, with 10% TBWL resulting in a 50% loss of liver triglycerides and improvement in all aspects of NASH histology. Lifestyle changes are the first step in addressing TBWL, but uncommonly result in the range required to improve liver histology in NASH (7%-10%). Weight loss medications (WLMs) are an effective additional tool because they can provide TBWL in the 7%-10% range, have a well-characterized clinical profile, have clear guidelines, and meet approved criteria for their use (body mass index greater than 27 kg/m2 ) for most NASH patients. Use of WLMs requires shared decision making with the patient, which hepatologists, due to their understanding of the natural history of NASH, are uniquely positioned to provide. WLMs do present the challenge of incorporating new medications into the hepatology clinic, but this will be necessary with all medications to manage NASH. WLMs provide a practical intervention that can be incorporated into hepatology clinics and can be offered to most NASH patients. NASH-specific medicines in clinical trials offer partial histological responses, and TBWL will likely enhance this. Conclusion: WLMs provide the hepatologist with effective and welcome clinical intervention beyond the diagnosis and staging of NASH and provide patients with a sense of empowerment about the treatment of their liver disease.
Authors: Frank L Greenway; Ken Fujioka; Raymond A Plodkowski; Sunder Mudaliar; Maria Guttadauria; Janelle Erickson; Dennis D Kim; Eduardo Dunayevich Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-07-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kishore M Gadde; David B Allison; Donna H Ryan; Craig A Peterson; Barbara Troupin; Michael L Schwiers; Wesley W Day Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Priscilla Hollander; Harold E Bays; Julio Rosenstock; Mary Ellen Frustaci; Albert Fung; Frank Vercruysse; Ngozi Erondu Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Meredith C Fidler; Matilde Sanchez; Brian Raether; Neil J Weissman; Steven R Smith; William R Shanahan; Christen M Anderson Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Patrick M O'Neil; Andreas L Birkenfeld; Barbara McGowan; Ofri Mosenzon; Sue D Pedersen; Sean Wharton; Charlotte Giwercman Carson; Cecilie Heerdegen Jepsen; Maria Kabisch; John P H Wilding Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: B Hameed; N A Terrault; R M Gill; R Loomba; N Chalasani; J H Hoofnagle; M L Van Natta Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2018-01-14 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Priscilla Hollander; Alok K Gupta; Raymond Plodkowski; Frank Greenway; Harold Bays; Colleen Burns; Preston Klassen; Ken Fujioka Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-10-21 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Mary Rinella; Donna R Cryer; Amy Articolo; Travis Fisher; Jennifer Schneider; Karl Nadolsky Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2022-07-10 Impact factor: 2.847