Priscilla Hollander1, Harold E Bays2, Julio Rosenstock3, Mary Ellen Frustaci4, Albert Fung5, Frank Vercruysse6, Ngozi Erondu5. 1. Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX priscilh@baylorhealth.edu. 2. Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, KY. 3. Dallas Diabetes Research Center at Medical City, Dallas, TX. 4. Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA. 5. Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ. 6. Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of coadministration of canagliflozin (CANA) and phentermine (PHEN) compared with placebo (PBO) and CANA or PHEN monotherapies in individuals who were overweight and obese without type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This 26-week, phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group study enrolled individuals who were obese or overweight without type 2 diabetes (N = 335, aged 18-65 years, BMI ≥30 to <50 kg/m2 or BMI ≥27 to <50 kg/m2 with hypertension and/or dyslipidemia). Participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive PBO, CANA 300 mg, PHEN 15 mg, or coadministration of CANA 300 mg and PHEN 15 mg (CANA/PHEN) orally once daily. The primary end point was percent change in body weight from baseline to week 26; key secondary end points were the proportion of participants achieving weight loss ≥5% and change from baseline in systolic blood pressure. RESULTS:CANA/PHEN provided statistically superior weight loss from baseline versus PBO at week 26 (least squares mean difference -6.9% [95% CI -8.6 to -5.2]; P < 0.001). CANA/PHEN also provided statistically superior achievement of weight loss ≥5% and reduction in systolic blood pressure compared with PBO. CANA/PHEN was generally well tolerated, with a safety and tolerability profile consistent with that of the individual components. CONCLUSIONS:CANA/PHEN produced meaningful reductions in body weight and was generally well tolerated in individuals who were overweight or obese without type 2 diabetes. Further studies are warranted to evaluate potential use of this combination for long-term weight management.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of coadministration of canagliflozin (CANA) and phentermine (PHEN) compared with placebo (PBO) and CANA or PHEN monotherapies in individuals who were overweight and obese without type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This 26-week, phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group study enrolled individuals who were obese or overweight without type 2 diabetes (N = 335, aged 18-65 years, BMI ≥30 to <50 kg/m2 or BMI ≥27 to <50 kg/m2 with hypertension and/or dyslipidemia). Participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive PBO, CANA 300 mg, PHEN 15 mg, or coadministration of CANA 300 mg and PHEN 15 mg (CANA/PHEN) orally once daily. The primary end point was percent change in body weight from baseline to week 26; key secondary end points were the proportion of participants achieving weight loss ≥5% and change from baseline in systolic blood pressure. RESULTS:CANA/PHEN provided statistically superior weight loss from baseline versus PBO at week 26 (least squares mean difference -6.9% [95% CI -8.6 to -5.2]; P < 0.001). CANA/PHEN also provided statistically superior achievement of weight loss ≥5% and reduction in systolic blood pressure compared with PBO. CANA/PHEN was generally well tolerated, with a safety and tolerability profile consistent with that of the individual components. CONCLUSIONS:CANA/PHEN produced meaningful reductions in body weight and was generally well tolerated in individuals who were overweight or obese without type 2 diabetes. Further studies are warranted to evaluate potential use of this combination for long-term weight management.
Authors: Moayad Mustafa Hejazi; Ala Osman Bacha; Mohammed Kaleemuddin; Fahad A Al-Abassi; Abdulbasit I Al-Alsieni; Imran Kazmi; Firoz Anwar Journal: Mol Cell Biochem Date: 2017-12-16 Impact factor: 3.396
Authors: Christine B San Giovanni; Brooke Sweeney; Joseph A Skelton; Megan M Kelsey; Aaron S Kelly Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Maria J Pereira; Per Lundkvist; Prasad G Kamble; Joey Lau; Julian G Martins; C David Sjöström; Volker Schnecke; Anna Walentinsson; Eva Johnsson; Jan W Eriksson Journal: Diabetes Ther Date: 2018-06-13 Impact factor: 2.945
Authors: Marc Evans; Angharad R Morgan; Zaheer Yousef; Gethin Ellis; Umesh Dashora; Dipesh C Patel; Pam Brown; Wasim Hanif; Johnathan N Townend; Naresh Kanumilli; Jim Moore; John P H Wilding; Stephen C Bain Journal: Drugs Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Ali Muhammed Ali; Robert Martinez; Hussein Al-Jobori; John Adams; Curtis Triplitt; Ralph DeFronzo; Eugenio Cersosimo; Muhammad Abdul-Ghani Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 19.112