| Literature DB >> 30990809 |
Sara Morcillo-Garcia1,2, Maria Del Mar Noblejas-Lopez1,2, Cristina Nieto-Jimenez1, Javier Perez-Peña1,2, Miriam Nuncia-Cantarero1,2, Balázs Győrffy3,4, Eitan Amir5, Atanasio Pandiella6, Eva M Galan-Moya1,2, Alberto Ocana1,2,7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Epigenetic regulating proteins like histone methyltransferases produce variations in several functions, some of them associated with the generation of oncogenic processes. Mutations of genes involved in these functions have been recently associated with cancer, and strategies to modulate their activity are currently in clinical development.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30990809 PMCID: PMC6467442 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Whole genome mutational profiling and identification of histone-lysine methyltransferase activity as deregulated in breast cancer.
A. Flow chart of the study, in which the METABRIC dataset was used to identify breast cancer mutated genes associated with worse outcome. B. Functional analyses of the mutated genes associated with worse outcome, using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 tool, and found in more than 2.5% of the breast cancer samples analyzed. The table shows the list of the mutated genes contained in each function.
Fig 2Mutational profile by breast cancer subtype, and association with biological functions.
A. Graphs displayed the mutation frequency of those genes mutated in more than 2.5% of patients for all and each breast cancer subtype. B. Heat map of the mutation frequency and the functions of the identified genes for each breast cancer subtypes. The percentage of mutated cases is displayed in the legend.
Proportion of mutations in the TCGA and METABRIC databases.
| Breast cancer subtype | Database | KMT2D | SETD2 | SETD1A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | ||||
| 0,32% | - | - | ||
| 0,81% | 0,00% | - | ||
| - | - | - |
Proportion of mutations in KMT2D, SETD2 and SETD1A using data from the METABRIC and TCGA studies contained in cBioportal. METABRIC does not provide data by breast cancer subtype.
Fig 3KMT2D, SETD2 and SETD1A mutational signature and clinical outcome.
A. Association of KMT2D, SETD2, and SETD1A mutational signature with patient outcome in all breast tumors. B. Association of KMT2D and SETD2 mutational signatures with prognosis in triple negative breast tumors. The online tool Genotype-2-Outcome was used for both analyses.
Fig 4Functional analysis of deregulated genes included in the KMT2D mutated signature.
A. Percentage of deregulated genes included in the KMT2D mutated signature by biological function. Overexpressed genes are displayed in blue and down-expressed genes in red. For functional annotation analysis, the online tool Enrichr was used as described in material and methods. B. Deregulated genes included in each function.
Fig 5Assessment of mutations at KMT2D.
A. Diagram showing each aminoacid (aa) which can be found to be mutated in the KMT2D gene. B. Type of mutations from the included cases. C. Functional impact of KMT2D mutations in the included cases. D. Relapse free survival (RFS) of breast cancer patients based on the transcriptomic expression of KMT2D. Low expression is associated with poor outcome. E. Relapse free survival (RFS) of triple negative breast cancer patients based on the transcriptomic expression of KMT2D. KM plotter online tool was used for these prognosis analyses. Low expression is associated with poor outcome.