| Literature DB >> 33968045 |
Chundi Gao1, Huayao Li2, Cun Liu1, Xiaowei Xu1, Jing Zhuang3, Chao Zhou2, Lijuan Liu2, Fubin Feng2, Changgang Sun3,4.
Abstract
In recent years, the emergence of immunotherapy has provided a new perspective for the treatment and management of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the relationship between tumor mutation burden (TMB) and immune infiltration and the prognosis of TNBC remains unclear. In this study, to explore the immunogenicity of TNBC, we divided patients with TNBC into high and low TMB groups based on the somatic mutation data of TNBC in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and screened out genes with mutation rate ≥10. Then, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the 5-year survival rate of the high TMB group was much higher than that of the low TMB group and the two groups also showed differences in immune cell infiltration. Further exploration found that the FAT3 gene, which displays significant difference and a higher mutation rate between the two groups, is not only significantly related to the prognosis of TNBC patients but also exhibits difference in immune cell infiltration between the wild group and the mutant group of the FAT3 gene. The results of gene set enrichment analysis and drug sensitivity analysis further support the importance of the FAT3 gene in TNBC. This study reveals the characteristics of TMB and immune cell infiltration in triple-negative breast cancer and their relationship with prognosis, to provide new biomarkers and potential treatment options for the future treatment of TNBC. The FAT3 gene, as a risk predictor gene of TNBC, is considered a potential biological target and may provide new insight for the treatment of TNBC.Entities:
Keywords: GSEA pathway analysis; drug sensitivity; immune infiltration; triple-negative breast cancer; tumor mutation burden
Year: 2021 PMID: 33968045 PMCID: PMC8097167 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.650491
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1The waterfall map of mutation information of genes in different samples, and different colors represent different types of mutations, showing that only 94 samples out of 101 TNBC mutation samples contained one or more target gene mutations. The upper bar chart shows each MB of each sample Mutation rate, red represents synonymous mutation, blue represents non-synonymous mutation.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with R package was used to analyze the survival of high and low TMB groups (P=0.03<0.05).
Analysis of differential expression of 8 genes between high and low TMB groups.
| Gene | LogFC | pValue |
|---|---|---|
| TTN | -0.162458567 | 0.817215408 |
| PTEN | -0.109935131 | 0.394175973 |
| SYNE1 | -0.111631373 | 0.790528299 |
| MUC4 | -0.60600324 | 0.154239881 |
| FAT3 | -4.519260317 | 0.003556808 |
| MUC16 | 0.718850636 | 0.059164372 |
| TP53 | -0.0406174 | 0.947741078 |
| KMT2D | -0.098513112 | 0.727527226 |
Figure 3Analysis of the difference of immune cells infiltration abundance. (A) between FAT3 mutant group and wild group. (B) ER+/PR+ groups and TNBC groups. Blue represents the wild group and red represents the mutant group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Figure 4Correlation analysis of immune cell abundance. (A) Between the FAT3 mutant groups and the wild groups (B) Between high and low TMB groups. Red represents positive correlation and blue represents negative correlation. The greater the absolute value of the correlation coefficient, the greater the correlation.
Figure 5Kaplan-Meier Diagram of FAT3 expression and prognosis in patients. Blue represents low expression, red represents high expression (P=0.007<0.05).
Figure 6GSEA pathway enrichment analysis among different groups. (A) between high and low FAT3 expression groups, (B) between FAT3 mutations and wild type groups, (C) between high and low TMB groups. Different colors represent different enrichment pathways, Enrichment Score > 0 represents activation of pathways, Enrichment Score < 0 represents inhibition of pathways.
Analysis of the relationship between the expression level of target gene FAT3 and clinical drug sensitivity.
| Gene | Drug | Cor | pValue |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAT3 | Epothilone B | -0.585958874 | 8.72E-07 |
| FAT3 | Pelitrexol | -0.572059432 | 1.80E-06 |
| FAT3 | Asparaginase | -0.35910059 | 0.004836662 |
| FAT3 | Methotrexate | -0.333109452 | 0.009303038 |
| FAT3 | Cladribine | -0.322685171 | 0.011917068 |
| FAT3 | Nitrogen mustard | -0.293665411 | 0.022766073 |
| FAT3 | AT-13387 | -0.28252021 | 0.028733379 |
| FAT3 | Fludarabine | -0.280942267 | 0.029675777 |
| FAT3 | Cytarabine | -0.274033854 | 0.034111829 |
| FAT3 | Clofarabine | -0.268904736 | 0.037751184 |
| FAT3 | Entinostat | -0.264710586 | 0.040961052 |
| FAT3 | Vorinostat | -0.263182274 | 0.042185297 |
| FAT3 | Parthenolide | -0.256714117 | 0.047704926 |
All the drugs presented here are not routinely used in clinic, but are rather effective against breast cancer cell lines in vitro.