Literature DB >> 30990073

Device Malfunctions and Complications Associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery: Review of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database.

Neel H Patel1, Nikil Uppaluri1, Michael Iorga1, Ariel Schulman2, Jonathan B Bloom3, John Phillips1, Sean Fullerton1, Sensuke Konno1, Muhammad Choudhury1, Majid Eshghi1.   

Abstract

Introduction and
Objectives: Multiple surgical therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have been developed to decrease complications and increase provider efficiency. We investigated contemporary BPH treatment device-related adverse events by searching a publicly available database. Materials and
Methods: The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was queried for contemporary BPH treatments. All devices were evaluated for malfunction, patient complications, and manufacturer review. The MAUDE adverse event classification system was used to standardize complications. Univariate analysis was performed to identify associations between BPH devices and adverse events.
Results: A total of 2567 reports were identified: transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) 197 (7.67%), holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) 39 (1.52%), GreenLight™ 2315 (90.2%), and UroLift® 16 (0.62%). The most common deviations for each modality included cutting loop detachment during TURP 116 (58.9%), morcellator dysfunction for HoLEP 23 (58.9%), tip fracture/detachment for GreenLight (68.8%), and failure to deploy during UroLift 10 (62.5%). Only 18 (0.7%) patients required medical/surgical management (MAUDE II-IV) due to a device complication. No significant relationship was seen between each modality and complications; however, morcellator use (27.8%) was observed in higher grade complications. Manufacturer review occurred in 61.7% of cases, with 41.3% of reviewed cases finding the operator the cause of the malfunction.
Conclusion: Each BPH modality investigated had minimal patient harm with over 99% of patients experiencing no complication after device malfunction. Of note, great care should be taken with morcellator use during HoLEP as it had the greatest number of MAUDE II to IV complications among all devices. Manufacturer review revealed that over 40% of cases were due to misuse by the user. Therefore, urologists should select the modalities they are most familiar with to decrease patient harm and prevent device malfunctions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  equipment and supplies; minimally invasive surgical procedures; prostatic hyperplasia

Year:  2019        PMID: 30990073      PMCID: PMC7207054          DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  19 in total

1.  Development of a Classification Scheme for Examining Adverse Events Associated with Medical Devices, Specifically the DaVinci Surgical System as Reported in the FDA MAUDE Database.

Authors:  Priyanka Gupta; John Schomburg; Suprita Krishna; Oluwakayode Adejoro; Qi Wang; Benjamin Marsh; Andrew Nguyen; Juan Reyes Genere; Patrick Self; Erik Lund; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Efficacy and Safety of Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate with 120 W 532 nm Laser in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia on Anticoagulation or Antiplatelet Therapy: Observations on Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Grzegorz Piotrowicz; Tomasz Syryło; Rafał Jedynak; Henryk Zieliński
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  National trends in surgical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in the United States (2000-2008).

Authors:  Bahaa S Malaeb; Xinhua Yu; A Marshall McBean; Sean P Elliott
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  The natural history of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia as diagnosed by North American urologists.

Authors:  M J Barry; F J Fowler; L Bin; J C Pitts; C J Harris; A G Mulley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Photoselective green-light laser vaporisation vs. TURP for BPH: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui Ding; Wan Du; Ze-Ping Lu; Zhen-Xing Zhai; Han-Zhang Wang; Zhi-Ping Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Contemporary practice patterns of endoscopic surgical management for benign prostatic hyperplasia among urologists in the United States.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; Andrew Southwick; Alexandra C Maschino; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Difficulty in the intravesical morcellation procedure for leiomyoma of the prostate enucleated by HoLEP.

Authors:  Toshiaki Shinojima; Shunsuke Yoshimine
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-08-21

Review 8.  Contemporary surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Ricardo Luís Vita Nunes; Alberto Azoubel Antunes; Davi Souza Constantin
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.209

9.  Ureteral Avulsion Associated with Ureteroscopy: Insights from the MAUDE Database.

Authors:  Ryuta Tanimoto; Ryan C Cleary; Demetrius H Bagley; Scott G Hubosky
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery and their management: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hemendra N Shah; Gopal H Badlani
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of hospital, community and home care model on nursing and quality of life of patients after transurethral resection of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Cuiping Niu; Xiaoling Huang; Lin Wang; Feng Liu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.