Literature DB >> 23219542

Contemporary practice patterns of endoscopic surgical management for benign prostatic hyperplasia among urologists in the United States.

William T Lowrance1, Andrew Southwick, Alexandra C Maschino, Jaspreet S Sandhu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe contemporary trends in endoscopic surgical management for benign prostatic hyperplasia. We examined case logs submitted by urologists for American Board of Urology certification or recertification. We compared electrosurgical transurethral resection of the prostate vs laser vaporization or laser enucleation and determined the impact of surgeon age on practice patterns.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed case logs from 2004 to 2010 for trends and used logistic regression models to assess the impact of surgeon age on endoscopic surgery use.
RESULTS: A total of 3,955 urologists included at least 1 endoscopic surgical management in the case logs, while 2,334 (59%) exclusively performed electrosurgical transurethral resection of the prostate and 309 (8%) exclusively performed laser vaporization or laser enucleation. We observed a large increase in the number and proportion of laser procedures from 11% in 2004 to 44% in 2010. Although there was no difference in median age between urologists who performed exclusively electrosurgical transurethral resection and those who performed laser procedures, the latter had a substantially higher case volume. Older urologists were significantly less likely to perform laser vaporization or enucleation when undergoing the second recertification (OR 0.56/10 years of age, 95% CI 0.36-0.87, p = 0.009), but not the initial certification.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a substantial increase in laser vaporization or laser enucleation procedures performed by urologists who underwent board certification or recertification in 2004 to 2010. However, of those undergoing the second recertification older age was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of performing laser procedures. These data provide estimates of current practice patterns and further our understanding of evolving surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23219542      PMCID: PMC4142198          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

1.  Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sascha A Ahyai; Karin Lehrich; Rainer M Kuntz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Transurethral resection of the prostate among medicare beneficiaries: 1984 to 1997. For the Patient Outcomes Research Team for Prostatic Diseases.

Authors:  J H Wasson; T A Bubolz; G L Lu-Yao; E Walker-Corkery; C S Hammond; M J Barry
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Decreasing electrosurgical transurethral resection of the prostate surgical volume during graduate medical education training is associated with increased surgical adverse events.

Authors:  Jaspreet S Sandhu; William I Jaffe; Doreen E Chung; Steven A Kaplan; Alexis E Te
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; Elena B Elkin; Lindsay M Jacks; David S Yee; Thomas L Jang; Vincent P Laudone; Bertrand D Guillonneau; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  A randomised trial comparing holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection in the treatment of prostates larger than 40 grams: results at 2 years.

Authors:  Liam C Wilson; Peter J Gilling; Andrew Williams; Katie M Kennett; Chris M Frampton; Andre M Westenberg; Mark R Fraundorfer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologists in the United States.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; James A Eastham; Caroline Savage; A C Maschino; Vincent P Laudone; Christopher B Dechet; Robert A Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Urologic diseases in America project: benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  John T Wei; Elizabeth Calhoun; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Practice patterns in benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical therapy: the dramatic increase in minimally invasive technologies.

Authors:  Xinhua Yu; Sean P Elliott; Timothy J Wilt; A Marshall McBean
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center, prospective, randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Francesco Montorsi; Richard Naspro; Andrea Salonia; Nazareno Suardi; Alberto Briganti; Matteo Zanoni; Sergio Valenti; Ivano Vavassori; Patrizio Rigatti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Transurethral resection of the prostate among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States: time trends and outcomes. Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT).

Authors:  G L Lu-Yao; M J Barry; C H Chang; J H Wasson; J E Wennberg
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  5 in total

1.  Device Malfunctions and Complications Associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery: Review of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database.

Authors:  Neel H Patel; Nikil Uppaluri; Michael Iorga; Ariel Schulman; Jonathan B Bloom; John Phillips; Sean Fullerton; Sensuke Konno; Muhammad Choudhury; Majid Eshghi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Trends in Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Joseph J Pariser; Vignesh T Packiam; Melanie A Adamsky; Gregory T Bales
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate in the Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Ghalib Jibara; Daniel D Sjoberg; Gillian L Stearns; Yariv Stabholz; Ali Fathollahi; Laura S Leddy; Nicole Benfante; Behfar Ehdaie; Jonathan A Coleman; James A Eastham; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.633

4.  Clinical Implications of Nadir Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels After Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate.

Authors:  Yung-Ting Cheng; Jian-Hua Hong; Yu-Chuan Lu; Yi-Kai Chang; Shih-Chun Hung; Kuo-Kang Feng; Shih-Ping Liu; Po-Ming Chow; Hong-Chiang Chang; Chung-Hsin Chen; Yeong-Shiau Pu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Conventional monopolar transurethral resection of prostate in patients with large prostate (≥80 grams).

Authors:  Mehmet Yucel; Bekir Aras; Soner Yalcinkaya; Namik Kemal Hatipoglu; Erol Aras
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2013-11-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.