| Literature DB >> 30988782 |
Shiying Zhou1, Xiaoyan Wu2, Aihua Ma3, Min Zhang4, Yanli Liu1.
Abstract
Clinical efficacy and adverse reaction rates of ABO hemolytic jaundice in patients with continuous and intermittent blue light irradiation were compared, to provide reference for clinical treatment of neonatal ABO hemolytic jaundice. A retrospective analysis of 307 patients with neonatal hemolytic jaundice admitted to Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao) from January 2010 to December 2017 was undertaken. A total of 165 cases of children with continuous blue light irradiation and 142 cases of intermittent blue light irradiation were analyzed. Also the serum bilirubin levels, phototherapy time and frequency, treatment efficiency and adverse reaction rates were compared between the groups. The phototherapy time of children in the continuous phototherapy group was significantly higher from the intermittent phototherapy group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=26.800, P<0.001). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in serum bilirubin levels between continuous and intermittent phototherapy groups (P>0.050). Serum bilirubin levels of patients in continuous and intermittent phototherapy groups were lower than both previous and before treatment period, and differences were statistically significant (P<0.001). The overall effective rate of the continuous phototherapy group was higher than that of the intermittent phototherapy group (P>0.050). The adverse reaction rates after treatment in the continuous phototherapy group was significantly higher than the intermittent phototherapy group (P<0.050). After the symptomatic treatment in children, the adverse reactions ceased. The therapeutic effect of intermittent blue light irradiation on neonatal ABO hemolytic jaundice was consistent with the continuous blue light irradiation treatment, and the intermittent blue light irradiation treatment has a low adverse reaction rate, and is worth promotion in clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: adverse reaction rates; clinical efficacy; continuous blue light irradiation; intermittent blue light irradiation; neonatal ABO hemolytic jaundice
Year: 2019 PMID: 30988782 PMCID: PMC6447920 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.7432
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Basic information of patients between the continuous and the intermittent phototherapy groups [n (%)].
| Variables | Continuous phototherapy group (n=165) | Intermittent phototherapy group (n=142) | t/Chi-square test | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.102 | 0.749 | ||
| Male | 89 (53.94) | 74 (52.11) | ||
| Female | 76 (46.06) | 68 (47.89) | ||
| Age (days) | 5.87±0.65 | 5.79±0.84 | 0.940 | 0.348 |
| Weight (kg) | 3.92±0.27 | 3.88±0.38 | 1.074 | 0.284 |
| Disease duration (days) | 5.22±0.86 | 5.17±0.62 | 0.576 | 0.565 |
| With or without deformity | 0.204 | 0.652 | ||
| With deformity | 2 (1.12) | 1 (0.70) | ||
| Without deformity | 163 (98.79) | 141 (99.30) | ||
| Maternity period | 1.202 | 0.548 | ||
| Premature | 115 (69.70) | 91 (64.08) | ||
| Full-term | 43 (26.06) | 45 (31.69) | ||
| Exceeded | 7 (4.24) | 6 (4.23) |
Comparison of phototherapy time and frequency in children between the phototherapy and the intermittent phototherapy groups (mean ± standard deviation).
| Items | Continuous phototherapy group (n=165) | Intermittent phototherapy group (n=142) | t | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time of phototherapy (h) | 29.54±3.28 | 20.18±2.76 | 26.800 | <0.001 |
| Number of phototherapy (times) | 2.61±0.18 | 2.65±0.24 | 1.665 | 0.097 |
Comparison of serum bilirubin (µmol/l) levels in children between the continuous and the intermittent phototherapy groups before and after 24, 48 and 72 h of treatment.
| Items | Continuous phototherapy group (n=165) | The intermittent phototherapy group (n=142) | t | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 284.25±3.68 | 283.67±3.59 | 1.392 | 0.165 |
| 24 h after treatment | 211.54±2.50[ | 212.02±2.34[ | 1.728 | 0.085 |
| 48 h after treatment | 139.49±3.28[ | 140.23±3.75[ | 1.844 | 0.066 |
| 72 h after treatment | 49.98±2.64[ | 50.54±2.66[ | 1.847 | 0.066 |
| F | 176534.000 | 142991.000 | ||
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 |
The difference was statistically different (P<0.050) compared with the previous time point.
Figure 1.Comparison of serum bilirubin levels of children between the continuous and the intermittent phototherapy groups at 24, 48 and 72 h before and after treatment. Before treatment, there was no significant difference in serum bilirubin levels between the continuous and the intermittent phototherapy groups (P>0.050). There was no significant difference in serum bilirubin levels between the continuous and the intermittent phototherapy groups at 24, 48 and 72 h after treatment (P>0.050). The serum bilirubin levels of patients in the continuous and the intermittent phototherapy groups were lower than the previous period and before treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.001). Difference is statistically different compared with the previous time point (*P<0.050).
Comparison of overall efficiency in children between the continuous and the intermittent phototherapy groups after treatment.
| Items | Partially-effective | Significantly-effective | Ineffective | Overall efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous phototherapy group (n=165) | 41 | 107 | 17 | 148 (89.70) |
| Intermittent phototherapy group (n=142) | 38 | 88 | 16 | 126 (88.73) |
| Chi-square test | – | – | – | 0.074 |
| P-value | – | – | – | 0.786 |
Comparison of adverse reactions of children between the continuous and the intermittent phototherapy groups after treatment [n (%)].
| Groups | Continuous phototherapy group (n=165) | Intermittent phototherapy group (n=142) | Chi-square test | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fever | 27 (16.36) | 11 (7.75) | – | – |
| Skin rash | 22 (13.33) | 13 (9.15) | – | – |
| Diarrhea | 12 (7.27) | 7 (4.93) | – | – |
| Others | 7 (4.24) | 4 (2.82) | – | – |
| Adverse reaction rates | 68 (41.21) | 35 (24.65) | 9.393 | 0.002 |