Literature DB >> 30987773

Low-Fidelity, In-Situ Pediatric Resuscitation Simulation Improves RN Competence and Self-Efficacy.

Ada Saqe-Rockoff, Amanda V Ciardiello, Finn D Schubert.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: ED staff lack adequate exposure to critical pediatric patients to develop competence and confidence in resuscitation scenarios. Simulations of various designs have shown success at increasing health care staff performance and self-efficacy.
METHODS: We developed a nurse-led, low-fidelity in situ simulation of a pediatric sepsis scenario. The primary goal was to improve staff adherence to resuscitation guidelines, as measured by the Clinical Performance Tool, a set of checklists designed to measure adherence to Pediatric Advanced Life Support algorithms by multidisciplinary teams during simulations. The secondary goal was to improve staff confidence, measured by the Confidence Scale, a 5-item Likert-type scale that can measure any psychomotor skill.
RESULTS: A total of 43 RNs participated in 12 simulations over a period of 3 months. Mean Clinical Performance score improved by 74%, from 5.3 to 9.2 (P < 0.001). Mean confidence score for RNs improved by 56%, from 2.48 (standard deviation [SD] 0.83) to 3.88 (SD 0.66) (P < 0.001). Several systems issues were identified and addressed by multidisciplinary teams, such as increasing respiratory therapist response to the emergency department and updating of the Broselow cart. DISCUSSION: In situ low-fidelity simulations led by RNs contributed to significant improvement in adherence to resuscitation guidelines and in staff confidence. The simulation design had minimal impact on staffing and budget and enabled identification and correction of systems issues.
Copyright © 2019 Emergency Nurses Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency department; In situ simulation; Low-fidelity simulation; Nurse-led simulation; Pediatric resuscitation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30987773     DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2019.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Nurs        ISSN: 0099-1767            Impact factor:   1.836


  5 in total

1.  Multiprofessional perspectives on the identification of latent safety threats via in situ simulation: a prospective cohort pilot study.

Authors:  Daniel Rusiecki; Melanie Walker; Stuart L Douglas; Sharleen Hoffe; Timothy Chaplin
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-09-23

2.  GENESISS 2-Generating Standards for In-Situ Simulation project: a systematic mapping review.

Authors:  Kerry Evans; Jenny Woodruff; Alison Cowley; Louise Bramley; Giulia Miles; Alastair Ross; Joanne Cooper; Bryn Baxendale
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.263

3.  The Future of Emergency Medicine (EM) Sim Cases: A Modified Massive Online Needs Assessment.

Authors:  Anson Dinh; Teresa M Chan; Kyla Caners; Andrew K Hall; Andrew Petrosoniak; Tim Chaplin; Christopher Heyd; Jared B Baylis
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-12

Review 4.  Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review.

Authors:  Jennifer Truchot; Valérie Boucher; Winny Li; Guillaume Martel; Eva Jouhair; Éliane Raymond-Dufresne; Andrew Petrosoniak; Marcel Emond
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Community-based in situ simulation: bringing simulation to the masses.

Authors:  Barbara M Walsh; Marc A Auerbach; Marcie N Gawel; Linda L Brown; Bobbi J Byrne; Aaron Calhoun
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2019-12-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.