Literature DB >> 30987518

A systematic review investigating outcome measures and uptake barriers when children and youth with complex disabilities use eye gaze assistive technology.

Erin Perfect1, Elizabeth Hoskin1, Samantha Noyek1,2, T Claire Davies1.   

Abstract

Children with complex disabilities sometimes have difficulty communicating with their parents, caregivers, and teachers. For these children, eye gaze assistive technology can be used to facilitate communication. Eye gaze assistive technology outcomes for children and youth were analyzed in this systematic review. Database and hand-searches yielded 4412 unduplicated results, of which 11 articles were eligible for this review. Outcome measures, as well as environmental and personal factors, were mapped to the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework. Communication outcomes were most prevalent and co-occurred with outcomes in all reported activities and participation domains. Environmental and personal factors were classified as either facilitators or as barriers in relation to device uptake and success. Although comprehensive professional and caregiver support was the primary facilitator for success, barriers could lead to rejection of the technology even when children were successful using the system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assistive technology; augmentative and alternative communication; children; eye gaze; eye tracking

Year:  2019        PMID: 30987518     DOI: 10.1080/17518423.2019.1600066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Neurorehabil        ISSN: 1751-8423            Impact factor:   2.308


  4 in total

1.  International Consensus Recommendations for the Assessment and Management of Individuals With CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder.

Authors:  Sam Amin; Marie Monaghan; Angel Aledo-Serrano; Nadia Bahi-Buisson; Richard F Chin; Angus J Clarke; J Helen Cross; Scott Demarest; Orrin Devinsky; Jenny Downs; Elia M Pestana Knight; Heather Olson; Carol-Anne Partridge; Graham Stuart; Marina Trivisano; Sameer Zuberi; Tim A Benke
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Stakeholder consensus for decision making in eye-gaze control technology for children, adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy service provision: findings from a Delphi study.

Authors:  Petra Karlsson; Tom Griffiths; Michael T Clarke; Elegast Monbaliu; Kate Himmelmann; Saranda Bekteshi; Abigail Allsop; René Pereksles; Claire Galea; Margaret Wallen
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 3.  ICF Personal Factors Strengthen Commitment to Person-Centered Rehabilitation - A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Maarit Karhula; Sari Saukkonen; Essi Xiong; Anu Kinnunen; Tuija Heiskanen; Heidi Anttila
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-08-16

4.  Communicative Interaction with and without Eye-Gaze Technology between Children and Youths with Complex Needs and Their Communication Partners.

Authors:  Yu-Hsin Hsieh; Maria Borgestig; Deepika Gopalarao; Joy McGowan; Mats Granlund; Ai-Wen Hwang; Helena Hemmingsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.