Literature DB >> 30394368

Micromanipulation of Chromosomes in Insect Spermatocytes.

Nicolas K H Lin1, Ryder Nance2, Jane Szybist2, Alan Cheville2, Leocadia V Paliulis3.   

Abstract

The micromanipulation of chromosomes has been an essential method for illuminating the mechanism for chromosome congression, the spindle checkpoint, and anaphase chromosome movements, and has been key to understanding what controls chromosome movements during a cell division. A skilled biologist can use a micromanipulator to detach chromosomes from the spindle, to reposition chromosomes within the cell, and to apply forces to chromosomes using a small glass needle with a very fine tip. While perturbations can be made to chromosomes using other methods such as optical trapping and other uses of a laser, to date, no other method allows the repositioning of cellular components on the scale of tens to hundreds of microns with little to no damage to the cell. The selection and preparation of appropriate cells for the micromanipulation of chromosomes, specifically describing the preparation of grasshopper and cricket spermatocyte primary cultures for the use in live-cell imaging and micromanipulation, are described here. In addition, we show the construction of a needle to be used for moving chromosomes within the cell, and the use of a joystick-controlled piezoelectric micromanipulator with a glass needle attached to it to reposition chromosomes within dividing cells. A sample result shows the use of a micromanipulator to detach a chromosome from a spindle in a primary spermatocyte and to reposition that chromosome within the cell.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30394368      PMCID: PMC6235582          DOI: 10.3791/57359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  26 in total

1.  Microdissection studies of the dividing neuroblast of the grasshopper, Chortophaga viridifasciata; de Geer.

Authors:  J G CARLSON
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1952       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Piezoelectric Micromanipulators: Electrically operated micromanipulators add automatic high-speed movement to normal manual control.

Authors:  G W Ellis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  'Anaphase' and cytokinesis in the absence of chromosomes.

Authors:  D Zhang; R B Nicklas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The non-random chromosome segregation in spermatocytes of Gryllotalpa hexadactyla. A micromanipulation analysis.

Authors:  R Camenzind; R B Micklas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Segregation of the amphitelically attached univalent X chromosome in the spittlebug Philaenus spumarius.

Authors:  Kristen D Felt; Makayla B Lagerman; Nigel A Ravida; Lu Qian; Samantha R Powers; Leocadia V Paliulis
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.356

7.  Co-segregation of sex chromosomes in the male black widow spider Latrodectus mactans (Araneae, Theridiidae).

Authors:  Jeffrey G Ault; Kristen D Felt; Ryan N Doan; Alexander O Nedo; Cassondra A Ellison; Leocadia V Paliulis
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Mechanically cut mitotic spindles: clean cuts and stable microtubules.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; G M Lee; C L Rieder; G Rupp
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Karyotype, sex determination, and meiotic chromosome behavior in two pholcid (Araneomorphae, Pholcidae) spiders: implications for karyotype evolution.

Authors:  Adriana E Golding; Leocadia V Paliulis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The reduction of chromosome number in meiosis is determined by properties built into the chromosomes.

Authors:  L V Paliulis; R B Nicklas
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-09-18       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  3 in total

1.  Individual kinetochore-fibers locally dissipate force to maintain robust mammalian spindle structure.

Authors:  Alexandra F Long; Pooja Suresh; Sophie Dumont
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 10.539

2.  Chromosome number, sex determination, and meiotic chromosome behavior in the praying mantid Hierodula membranacea.

Authors:  Leocadia V Paliulis; Emily L Stowe; Leila Hashemi; Noemi Pedraza-Aguado; Cynthia Striese; Silke Tulok; Thomas Müller-Reichert; Gunar Fabig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Microneedle manipulation of the mammalian spindle reveals specialized, short-lived reinforcement near chromosomes.

Authors:  Pooja Suresh; Alexandra F Long; Sophie Dumont
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 8.140

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.