Literature DB >> 30986577

Supervised physical therapy vs. home exercise for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Masakazu Minetama1, Mamoru Kawakami2, Masatoshi Teraguchi2, Ryohei Kagotani2, Yoshimasa Mera2, Tadashi Sumiya2, Masafumi Nakagawa2, Yoshio Yamamoto2, Sachika Matsuo2, Yumi Koike2, Nana Sakon2, Tomohiro Nakatani2, Tomoko Kitano2, Yukihiro Nakagawa2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Exercise has been reported to improve short-term outcomes for patients with LSS in terms of disability and back and leg pain. However, no studies have compared supervised exercise with unsupervised exercise or quantified physical activity using a pedometer to confirm compliance with a home exercise program.
PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of supervised physical therapy (PT) with unsupervised exercise for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: A single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients presenting with symptoms of neurogenic claudication caused by LSS, which was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was improvement in symptom severity scores on the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included physical function on the ZCQ, self-paced walking test (SPWT) performance, pain indicated using a numerical rating scale (NRS), and the number of daily steps measured by pedometer.
METHODS: Patients with LSS were randomized to a PT group, who performed supervised PT twice a week for 6 weeks, or a home exercise (HE) group. PT sessions included manual therapy, individually tailored stretching and strengthening exercises, cycling, and body weight-supported treadmill walking.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients were randomly allocated to the PT group and 43 patients to the HE group. Compared with the HE group, the PT group had greater percentage of responders achieving minimum clinically important difference in ZCQ symptom severity (difference for percentage between groups [95%confidence interval], 30.2% [9.1-48.6], p=.01), ZCQ physical function (32.6% [11.6-50.6], p<.01), walking distance on the SPWT (39.5% [18.8-56.7], p<.01), leg pain on the NRS (34.9% [13.9-52.7], p<.01), and number of daily steps (25.6% [4.9-43.9], p=.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Supervised PT for patients with LSS resulted in significant short-term improvements in symptom severity, physical function, walking distance, pain, and physical activity compared with unsupervised exercise.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Home exercise; Individually tailored exercise; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Pedometer; Physical activity; Physical therapy; Randomized controlled trial; Supervised exercise; Walking distance; Zurich claudication questionnaire

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30986577     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Lu Lin; Xiao-Qin Liu; Lei Shi; Si Cheng; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Qi-Jun Ge; Ding-Zhi Gao; Amadou Cheffou Ismail; Zhen-Yong Ke; Lei Chu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-15

2.  Supervised physical therapy versus surgery for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Masakazu Minetama; Mamoru Kawakami; Masatoshi Teraguchi; Yoshio Enyo; Masafumi Nakagawa; Yoshio Yamamoto; Sachika Matsuo; Tomohiro Nakatani; Nana Sakon; Yukihiro Nakagawa
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 3.  Efficacy and characteristics of physiotherapy interventions in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Federico Temporiti; Silvano Ferrari; Michael Kieser; Roberto Gatti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  Treatment-based classification for low back pain: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robson Massi Bastos; Claudia Regina Moya; Rodrigo Antunes de Vasconcelos; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2022-01-24

5.  The Effectiveness of Pharmacopuncture in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Protocol for a Multi-Centered, Pragmatic, Randomized, Controlled, Parallel Group Study.

Authors:  Jee Young Lee; Kyoung Sun Park; Suna Kim; Ji Yeon Seo; Hyun-Woo Cho; Dongwoo Nam; Yeoncheol Park; Eun-Jung Kim; Yoon Jae Lee; In-Hyuk Ha
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 2.832

6.  Non-operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia; Corey Hofkirchner; Joshua Plener; André Bussières; Michael J Schneider; James J Young; Andrea D Furlan; Kent Stuber; Aksa Ahmed; Carol Cancelliere; Aleisha Adeboyejo; Joseph Ornelas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The Clinical Effectiveness of a Physiotherapy Delivered Physical and Psychological Group Intervention for Older Adults With Neurogenic Claudication: The BOOST Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Esther Williamson; Graham Boniface; Ioana R Marian; Susan J Dutton; Angela Garrett; Alana Morris; Zara Hansen; Lesley Ward; Philippa J A Nicolson; David Rogers; Karen L Barker; Jeremy C Fairbank; Judith Fitch; David P French; Christine Comer; Christian D Mallen; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 6.591

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.