Literature DB >> 30986173

Long-Term Survival of Patients with Tracheostomy Having Different Diseases Followed up in the Respiratory Intensive Care Unit Outpatient Clinic: Which Patients are Lucky?

Emine Aksoy1, Birsen Ocaklı1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Tracheostomy is a method of separating a patient from the mechanical ventilator in the intensive care unit (ICU). The long-term survivors among patients followed up with tracheostomy and ventilator in the respiratory ICU (RICU) outpatient clinic due to different diseases were investigated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospectively designed cohort study between January 2004 and July 2018. Patients with chronic respiratory failure followed up with tracheostomy and/or ventilator at the RICU outpatient clinic were included in the study. Age, gender, indications and date of tracheostomy, use of domestic mechanical ventilation, and mortality were recorded. The groups were compared according to age, gender, and tracheostomy indication diseases, and the 1-3-year long-term mortality rates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and the Cox regression test was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 134 (64% male) patients with a median age of 66 (54-73) years were included in the study. The indications for tracheostomy were heart failure (HF) and cerebrovascular diseases (38.1%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (23.1%), neuromuscular diseases (22.4%), obesity hypoventilation (9.7%), and kyphoscoliosis (6.7%). Mortality was higher in patients >75 years old in the 3-year follow-up (p=0.022). The 3-year mortality hazard ratio (HR) factors and 95% confidence interval (CI) were as follows: age >75 years HR=1.71 (95% CI, 1.03-2.82; p<0.036) and HF and cerebrovascular disease diseases sequela HR=1.84 (95% CI, 1.03-3.29; p<0.041) significantly increased the 3-year mortality, and having COPD decreased mortality in 46% (p<0.041).
CONCLUSION: Patients with neuromuscular disorders, kyphoscoliosis, and COPD who have undergone tracheostomy were the luckiest group according to the 3-year survival rates, whereas patients with HF and cerebrovascular diseases were the unluckiest ones. The most important decision triangle is the patient's acceptance (A), family support (B), and tracheostomy indication (C), and this may vary from country to country depending on the beliefs of subjects.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30986173      PMCID: PMC6590273          DOI: 10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2018.18120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Thorac J        ISSN: 2148-7197


  12 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based guidelines for weaning and discontinuing ventilatory support: a collective task force facilitated by the American College of Chest Physicians; the American Association for Respiratory Care; and the American College of Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  N R MacIntyre; D J Cook; E W Ely; S K Epstein; J B Fink; J E Heffner; D Hess; R D Hubmayer; D J Scheinhorn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Outcomes of prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Shannon S Carson
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.687

Review 3.  The obesity hypoventilation syndrome.

Authors:  Amy L Olson; Clifford Zwillich
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 4.  Long-term survival of critically ill patients treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emily Damuth; Jessica A Mitchell; Jason L Bartock; Brian W Roberts; Stephen Trzeciak
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 30.700

5.  Clinical predictors and outcomes for patients requiring tracheostomy in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  M H Kollef; T S Ahrens; W Shannon
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 6.  Tracheotomy in the intensive care unit: Guidelines from a French expert panel: The French Intensive Care Society and the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Trouillet; Olivier Collange; Fouad Belafia; François Blot; Gilles Capellier; Eric Cesareo; Jean-Michel Constantin; Alexandre Demoule; Jean-Luc Diehl; Pierre-Grégoire Guinot; Franck Jegoux; Erwan L'Her; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Yazine Mahjoub; Julien Mayaux; Hervé Quintard; François Ravat; Sébastien Vergez; Julien Amour; Max Guillot
Journal:  Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Patterns of home mechanical ventilation use in Europe: results from the Eurovent survey.

Authors:  S J Lloyd-Owen; G C Donaldson; N Ambrosino; J Escarabill; R Farre; B Fauroux; D Robert; B Schoenhofer; A K Simonds; J A Wedzicha
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 16.671

8.  Management of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: report of a NAMDRC consensus conference.

Authors:  Neil R MacIntyre; Scott K Epstein; Shannon Carson; David Scheinhorn; Kent Christopher; Sean Muldoon
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 9.  The patient needing prolonged mechanical ventilation: a narrative review.

Authors:  Nicolino Ambrosino; Michele Vitacca
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2018-02-26

10.  Indications and outcome of tracheostomy in Ilorin, North Central Nigeria: 10 years review.

Authors:  B S Alabi; O A Afolabi; A D Dunmade; H K Omokanye; I O Ajayi; S O Ayodele; N O Busari
Journal:  Ann Afr Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Mortality outcomes of patients on chronic mechanical ventilation in different care settings: A systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie M Sison; Gayathri K Sivakumar; Christine Caufield-Noll; William B Greenough; Esther S Oh; Panagis Galiatsatos
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-02-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.