Literature DB >> 29559211

Tracheotomy in the intensive care unit: Guidelines from a French expert panel: The French Intensive Care Society and the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine.

Jean-Louis Trouillet1, Olivier Collange2, Fouad Belafia3, François Blot4, Gilles Capellier5, Eric Cesareo6, Jean-Michel Constantin7, Alexandre Demoule8, Jean-Luc Diehl9, Pierre-Grégoire Guinot10, Franck Jegoux11, Erwan L'Her12, Charles-Edouard Luyt13, Yazine Mahjoub14, Julien Mayaux8, Hervé Quintard15, François Ravat16, Sébastien Vergez17, Julien Amour18, Max Guillot19.   

Abstract

Tracheotomy is widely used in intensive care units, albeit with great disparities between medical teams in terms of frequency and modality. Indications and techniques are, however, associated with variable levels of evidence based on inhomogeneous or even contradictory literature. Our aim was to conduct a systematic analysis of the published data in order to provide guidelines. We present herein recommendations for the use of tracheotomy in adult critically ill patients developed using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) method. These guidelines were conducted by a group of experts from the French Intensive Care Society (Société de réanimation de langue française) and the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société francaise d'anesthésie réanimation) with the participation of the French Emergency Medicine Association (Société française de médecine d'urgence), the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology. Sixteen experts and two coordinators agreed to consider questions concerning tracheotomy and its practical implementation. Five topics were defined: indications and contraindications for tracheotomy in intensive care, tracheotomy techniques in intensive care, modalities of tracheotomy in intensive care, management of patients undergoing tracheotomy in intensive care, and decannulation in intensive care. The summary made by the experts and the application of GRADE methodology led to the drawing up of 8 formal guidelines, 10 recommendations, and 3 treatment protocols. Among the 8 formal guidelines, 2 have a high level of proof (Grade 1±) and 6 a low level of proof (Grade 2±). For the 10 recommendations, GRADE methodology was not applicable and instead 10 expert opinions were produced.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29559211     DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med        ISSN: 2352-5568            Impact factor:   4.132


  8 in total

1.  What's new in intensive care: tracheostomy-what is known and what remains to be determined.

Authors:  José Aquino Esperanza; Paolo Pelosi; Lluís Blanch
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Long-Term Survival of Patients with Tracheostomy Having Different Diseases Followed up in the Respiratory Intensive Care Unit Outpatient Clinic: Which Patients are Lucky?

Authors:  Emine Aksoy; Birsen Ocaklı
Journal:  Turk Thorac J       Date:  2019-04-01

3.  Clinical Proof of Concept for Stabilization of Tracheostomy Tubes Using Novel DYNAtraq Device.

Authors:  Mauricio Orozco-Levi; Carlos Reyes; Neikel Quintero; Diana Tiga-Loza; Mabel Reyes; Sandra Sanabria; Camilo Pizarro; Juan De Hoyos; Norma Serrano; Victor Castillo; Alba Ramírez-Sarmiento
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-07-13

4.  Standardized Endoscopic Swallowing Evaluation for Tracheostomy Decannulation in Critically Ill Neurologic Patients - a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Paul Muhle; Sonja Suntrup-Krueger; Karoline Burkardt; Sriramya Lapa; Mao Ogawa; Inga Claus; Bendix Labeit; Sigrid Ahring; Stephan Oelenberg; Tobias Warnecke; Rainer Dziewas
Journal:  Neurol Res Pract       Date:  2021-05-10

5.  Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the "standardized endoscopic swallowing evaluation for tracheostomy decannulation in critically ill neurologic patients".

Authors:  Tobias Warnecke; Paul Muhle; Inga Claus; Jens B Schröder; Bendix Labeit; Sriramya Lapa; Sonja Suntrup-Krueger; Rainer Dziewas
Journal:  Neurol Res Pract       Date:  2020-03-30

6.  Construction of a detachable artificial trachea model for three age groups for use in an endotracheal suctioning training environment simulator.

Authors:  Takaaki Yoshimura; Noriyo Colley; Shunsuke Komizunai; Shinji Ninomiya; Satoshi Kanai; Atsushi Konno; Koichi Yasuda; Hiroshi Taguchi; Takayuki Hashimoto; Shinichi Shimizu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Risk Factors for Tracheostomy after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A 10-Year Study of 456 Patients.

Authors:  Ping-Ping Long; Da-Wei Sun; Zheng-Feng Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 2.071

8.  Effect of Early Tracheostomy on Mortality of Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Nationwide Observational Study.

Authors:  Naoki Yonezawa; Taisuke Jo; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.210

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.