Literature DB >> 30986141

Verbal Learning and Memory in Early-Implanted, Prelingually Deaf Adolescent and Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Suyog H Chandramouli1, William G Kronenberger2,3, David B Pisoni1,3.   

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the information-processing strategies of early-implanted, prelingually deaf cochlear implant (CI) users with the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II; Delis, Kramer, Kaplan, & Ober, 2000 ), a well-established normed measure of verbal learning and memory used in neuropsychological assessments of memory loss. Method Verbal learning and memory skills were compared in 20 older adolescent and young adult prelingually deaf long-term early-implanted CI users and their 24 normal hearing (NH) peers using the CVLT-II, a widely used multitrial free recall test of verbal learning and memory. Results On average, CI users recalled fewer words than their NH peers across the immediate, delayed, and cued recall trials of the CVLT-II but were comparable to their NH peers on yes/no recognition memory. CI users showed little evidence of semantic clustering of words during free recall but greater serial clustering compared to their NH peers, suggesting fundamental disturbances in automatic semantic activation of words from long-term memory. No differences were found in verbal memory between CI users and their NH peers on measures of retroactive interference and encoding/retrieval interactions. Performance on the 2nd word list of the CVLT-II (List B) and amount of semantic clustering of words during recall were correlated with sentence recognition in the CI group. Conclusion Study findings demonstrate significant differences in free recall performance and information-processing strategies that early-implanted, prelingually deaf CI users use to encode, organize, store, and retrieve spoken words in conventional verbal list learning paradigms, compared to their NH peers. Because verbal learning and memory are core foundational processes routinely used in daily functioning for a wide range of neurocognitive and language processing operations, these findings suggest potential domains for assessment and novel interventions to promote the development of optimal outcomes in prelingually deaf early-implanted long-term CI users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30986141      PMCID: PMC6802885          DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-18-0125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  37 in total

1.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach.

Authors:  Randall W Engle; Stephen W Tuholski; James E Laughlin; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-09

2.  Measures of digit span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children after more than 10 years of cochlear implantation.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger; Adrienne S Roman; Ann E Geers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Cognitive predictors of improvements in adults' spoken word recognition six months after cochlear implant activation.

Authors:  Gitry Heydebrand; Sandra Hale; Lisa Potts; Brenda Gotter; Margaret Skinner
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Digit span recall error analysis in pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  R Burkholder; D Pisoni
Journal:  Int Congr Ser       Date:  2004-11-01

6.  Self-report of cochlear implant use and satisfaction by prelingually deafened adults.

Authors:  T A Zwolan; P R Kileny; S A Telian
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability.

Authors:  D N Kalikow; K N Stevens; L L Elliott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Learning and Memory Processes Following Cochlear Implantation: The Missing Piece of the Puzzle.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger; Suyog H Chandramouli; Christopher M Conway
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Bimodal Benefits for Lexical Tone Recognition: An Investigation on Mandarin-speaking Preschoolers with a Cochlear Implant and a Contralateral Hearing Aid.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Jing Zhang; Hongwei Ding; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-04-17

2.  Listening in Noise Remains a Significant Challenge for Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence from Early Deafened and Those with Progressive Hearing Loss Compared to Peers with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Yossi Bugannim; Doreen Zechoval; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Ronen Perez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.