Literature DB >> 30986042

Evaluation of Distance Metrics and Spatial Autocorrelation in Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection Applied to Mass Spectrometry Imaging Data.

Tina Smets1, Nico Verbeeck1,2, Marc Claesen1,2, Arndt Asperger3, Gerard Griffioen4, Thomas Tousseyn5, Wim Waelput6, Etienne Waelkens7, Bart De Moor1.   

Abstract

In this work, uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) is applied for nonlinear dimensionality reduction and visualization of mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) data. We evaluate the performance of the UMAP algorithm on MSI data sets acquired in mouse pancreas and human lymphoma samples and compare it to those of principal component analysis (PCA), t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), and the Barnes-Hut (BH) approximation of t-SNE. Furthermore, we compare different distance metrics in (BH) t-SNE and UMAP and propose the use of spatial autocorrelation as a means of comparing the resulting low-dimensional embeddings. The results indicate that UMAP is competitive with t-SNE in terms of visualization and is well-suited for the dimensionality reduction of large (>100 000 pixels) MSI data sets. With an almost fourfold decrease in runtime, it is more scalable in comparison with the current state-of-the-art: t-SNE or the Barnes-Hut approximation of t-SNE. In what seems to be the first application of UMAP to MSI data, we assess the value of applying alternative distance metrics, such as the correlation, cosine, and the Chebyshev metric, in contrast to the traditionally used Euclidean distance metric. Furthermore, we propose "histomatch" as an additional custom distance metric for the analysis of MSI data.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30986042     DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  7 in total

1.  Spatial Segmentation of Mass Spectrometry Imaging Data by Combining Multivariate Clustering and Univariate Thresholding.

Authors:  Hang Hu; Ruichuan Yin; Hilary M Brown; Julia Laskin
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Unsupervised machine learning for exploratory data analysis in imaging mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Nico Verbeeck; Richard M Caprioli; Raf Van de Plas
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 10.946

3.  Spatial Metabolomics and Imaging Mass Spectrometry in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Theodore Alexandrov
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci       Date:  2020-04-13

4.  Spatially aware clustering of ion images in mass spectrometry imaging data using deep learning.

Authors:  Wanqiu Zhang; Marc Claesen; Thomas Moerman; M Reid Groseclose; Etienne Waelkens; Bart De Moor; Nico Verbeeck
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Mapping enzyme catalysis with metabolic biosensing.

Authors:  Linfeng Xu; Kai-Chun Chang; Emory M Payne; Cyrus Modavi; Leqian Liu; Claire M Palmer; Nannan Tao; Hal S Alper; Robert T Kennedy; Dale S Cornett; Adam R Abate
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  UMAP-DBP: An Improved DNA-Binding Proteins Prediction Method Based on Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection.

Authors:  Jinyue Wang; Shengli Zhang; Huijuan Qiao; Jiesheng Wang
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 2.371

7.  A mathematical comparison of non-negative matrix factorization related methods with practical implications for the analysis of mass spectrometry imaging data.

Authors:  Melanie Nijs; Tina Smets; Etienne Waelkens; Bart De Moor
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.586

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.