Literature DB >> 30985110

Reaction Monitoring Using SABRE-Hyperpolarized Benchtop (1 T) NMR Spectroscopy.

Olga Semenova1, Peter M Richardson1, Andrew J Parrott2, Alison Nordon2, Meghan E Halse1, Simon B Duckett1.   

Abstract

The conversion of [IrCl(COD)(IMes)] (COD = cis, cis-1,5-cyclooctadiene, IMes = 1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethyl-phenyl)imidazole-2-ylidene) in the presence of an excess of para-hydrogen ( p-H2) and a substrate (4-aminopyridine (4-AP) or 4-methylpyridine (4-MP)) into [Ir(H)2(IMes)(substrate)3]Cl is monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy using a benchtop (1 T) spectrometer in conjunction with the p-H2-based hyperpolarization technique signal amplification by reversible exchange (SABRE). A series of single-shot 1H NMR measurements are used to monitor the chemical changes that take place in solution through the lifetime of the hyperpolarized response. Non-hyperpolarized high-field 1H NMR control measurements were also undertaken to confirm that the observed time-dependent changes relate directly to the underlying chemical evolution. The formation of [Ir(H)2(IMes)(substrate)3]Cl is further linked to the hydrogen isotope exchange (HIE) reaction, which leads to the incorporation of deuterium into the ortho positions of 4-AP, where the source of deuterium is the solvent, methanol- d4. Comparable reaction monitoring results are achieved at both high-field (9.4 T) and low-field (1 T). It is notable that the low sensitivity of the benchtop (1 T) NMR enables the use of protio solvents, which when used here allows the effects of catalyst formation and substrate deuteration to be separated. Collectively, these methods illustrate how low-cost low-field NMR measurements provide unique insight into a complex catalytic process through a combination of hyperpolarization and relaxation data.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30985110      PMCID: PMC6892580          DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


Reaction monitoring using process analytical technology (PAT) is an important part of synthetic optimization, reaction scale-up, and industrial quality control.[1] Although NMR spectroscopy is a well-established method for reaction monitoring, standard high-field (7–23 T) NMR spectrometers are large and costly to both purchase and operate, thereby making them poorly suited to PAT applications. Recently, low-cost benchtop NMR spectrometers, based on permanent magnets with field strengths around 1–2 T, have become available.[2] These offer an opportunity to address the issue of cost while also providing a level of detector portability.[2] However, these instruments suffer from relatively low sensitivity and reduced chemical shift dispersion due to the lower magnetic field strengths, which limits their viability for the study of low-concentration analytes and nuclei with low NMR receptivity such as 13C. One potential solution to this issue is to combine benchtop NMR with hyperpolarization. Hyperpolarization is a term used to describe methods that generate NMR signal responses that are enhanced relative to those associated with nuclear spins at thermal equilibrium in the detection field.[3] Some of the most popular hyperpolarization methods today are dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP),[4] spin-exchange optical pumping (SEOP),[5] and para-hydrogen induced polarization (PHIP).[6] In the context of industrial process monitoring, it is essential that the hyperpolarization process itself is low-cost and compact so that it does not compromise the advantages of benchtop NMR. Dissolution DNP has been integrated with benchtop NMR for monitoring the conversion of [1-13C] pyruvate to [1-13C] lactate in vitro and in vivo.[7] However, the generation of hyperpolarized compounds by dissolution DNP is time-consuming (ca. 90 min per hyperpolarized sample) as well as costly and requires equipment with a large footprint. In contrast, we focus here on PHIP methods, which are relatively inexpensive and yield hyperpolarization in seconds.[8] In the traditional approach of Bowers and Weitekamp, para-hydrogen induced polarization (PHIP) is achieved through hydrogenation of the molecule under investigation.[8a,9] Introduced in 2009, the signal amplification by reversible exchange (SABRE) method is a non-hydrogenative version of PHIP that catalytically transfers p-H2-derived polarization without changing the chemical structure of the target compound.[10] In this technique, p-H2 and the target compound, often called the substrate, bind reversibly to the metal center of the SABRE catalyst (Figure ). Once attached to the metal center, the magnetic symmetry of p-H2 is broken, and the resultant hydride ligands are able to transfer their latent polarization into the bound substrate via the J-coupling network of the complex. This process can be optimized by using a weak magnetic field that often lies in the range of 0–200 G depending on the type of nucleus that is to receive the polarization.[11] The SABRE method is reversible, taking seconds to build up polarization, while target molecules can be repolarized by adding fresh p-H2. Therefore, it provides a fast and renewable or indeed continuous route to hyperpolarization. As a result of the relatively cheap methods for generating and storing p-H2 and the comparative simplicity of the SABRE method, this is an attractive approach for industrial process monitoring using hyperpolarized benchtop NMR.[8] Indeed, SABRE has already been combined with benchtop NMR to enhance 1H, 13C, and 15N NMR signals.[12] One of the limitations of the SABRE method compared to other approaches such as DNP is the range of substrates that are amenable to hyperpolarization, with the best results being observed for N-heterocycles. However, many groups are working to expand the scope of the SABRE method in order to make it more generally applicable.[12d,13] Additionally a number of articles have proposed routes to achieve biocompatible SABRE hyperpolarization with a view to in vivo detection of biomolecules.[14]
Figure 1

In the presence of an excess of para-hydrogen (p-H2) and substrate, the exchange processes allows polarization transfer from p-H2 such that NMR resonances of the free substrate are enhanced. This transfer occurs most often at a low magnetic field (0–200 G) through the scalar coupling network in the active complex and, because of its reversibility, operates continuously when fresh p-H2 is supplied.

In the presence of an excess of para-hydrogen (p-H2) and substrate, the exchange processes allows polarization transfer from p-H2 such that NMR resonances of the free substrate are enhanced. This transfer occurs most often at a low magnetic field (0–200 G) through the scalar coupling network in the active complex and, because of its reversibility, operates continuously when fresh p-H2 is supplied. In this work, we introduce a method to follow reactivity using single-shot measurements that probe both the lifetime and the magnitude of a SABRE-enhanced 1H NMR response. Such measurements can be easily completed at either high or low field. To illustrate this method and its benefits, we follow the reaction in which the SABRE precatalyst converts into the active catalyst. Specifically, we monitor the formation of [Ir(H)2(IMes)(substrate)3]Cl (IMes = 1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethyl-phenyl)imidazole-2-ylidene).[15] Because iridium complexes facilitate the hydrogen isotope exchange (HIE) reaction, deuteration of the substrate is observed during this process in methanol-d4.[10,16] High-field (9.4 T, 400 MHz) 1H NMR detection is initially used to measure the changes in SABRE hyperpolarization lifetimes during the catalyst activation and HIE reactions. Parallel non-hyperpolarized 1H NMR measurements are completed to link the observed changes in hyperpolarization lifetime to the underlying chemical changes in solution. Because of the reduced sensitivity and increased peak overlap in 1H NMR spectra acquired at 1 T (43 MHz), standard 1H NMR reaction monitoring of these processes cannot be achieved using benchtop NMR. We overcome these limitations by using our hyperpolarized response while also exploiting the inherent low sensitivity of a benchtop NMR spectrometer to allow experiments in nondeuterated solvents to fully differentiate the effects of the active SABRE catalyst formation from those of target substrate deuteration.

Experimental Section

Sample Preparation

NMR samples were prepared from a 0.6 mL solution of 5 mM [IrCl(COD)(IMes)] (COD = cis,cis-1,5-cyclooctadiene, IMes = 1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethyl-phenyl)imidazole-2-ylidene) in methanol-d4 or protio methanol by adding 15 μmol of 4-AP or 4-MP (5 equivalents with respect to the SABRE precatalyst 1) in a 5 mm NMR tube fitted with a Young’s tap (GPE Scientific Ltd., Leighton Buzzard, UK). The samples were degassed using a three-stage freeze–pump–thaw method in a bath of dry ice and acetone. The precatalyst was synthesized in-house, and the 4-AP and 4-MP were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd., Gillingham, UK) and used without further modification. 1H, 13C, and 15N NMR characterization data for 4-AP, 4-MP, [Ir(COD)(IMes)(substrate)]Cl, and [Ir(H)2(IMes)(substrate)3]Cl (substrate = 4-AP or 4-MP) is available in the Supporting Information.

SABRE Catalyst Activation Monitoring Using Standard 1H NMR

Solutions containing the precatalyst 1 with either 4-AP or 4-MP in methanol-d4 or protio methanol formed the unactivated catalyst [Ir(COD)(IMes)(substrate)]Cl. A 0.6 mL aliquot of this initial solution was added to a 5 mm NMR tube equipped with a Young’s tap and degassed following the sample preparation procedure described above. When 4-MP was used as the substrate, peaks corresponding to the precatalyst 1 were observed in the prepared solution and were quantified by 1H NMR at 400 MHz as contributing 15% of the signal, suggesting 85% of 1 had converted to the unactivated catalyst [Ir(COD)(IMes)(4-MP)]Cl at equilibrium. In contrast, no 1H NMR peaks corresponding to 1 were observed in the initial 1H NMR spectra for samples where 4-AP was used as the substrate, suggesting full conversion to 2. When the conversion of precatalyst 1 into [Ir(COD)(IMes)(4-AP)]Cl 2 was monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy for a sample containing 5 mM of 1 and 25 mM of 4-AP in methanol-d4 at 280 K, the reaction took 14 min to reach completion. To monitor the formation of the active complex [Ir(H)2(IMes)(substrate)3]Cl (substrate = 4-AP or 4-MP), H2 (4 bar absolute) was added to the headspace of the NMR tube. The sample was shaken vigorously for around 5 s and inserted into the NMR spectrometer (Bruker AVIII 400 MHz) at 298 K. A series of 1H spectra were acquired over a period of 15.5 h (Figure S4).

Measurement of Hyperpolarized Signal

SABRE hyperpolarization transfer experiments were performed under 4 bar p-H2 that was produced by cooling H2 gas over a paramagnetic catalyst[8b,17] at 28 K to yield >99% para-enrichment. After the para-enriched H2 was added to the headspace of the NMR tube, the sample was shaken for 5 s in a polarization transfer field (PTF) of 6.1 ± 0.3 mT (61 ± 3 G) generated by a hand-held magnet array,[12c] to dissolve the p-H2 into solution and allow for polarization transfer to occur. Immediately following shaking, the sample was transferred manually into the spectrometer for a single-shot NMR measurement using either a single 90° radiofrequency (RF) pulse followed by acquisition of the FID or a variable flip angle single-shot T1 sequence (details below). 1H NMR spectra were acquired on either a Bruker AVIII 400 MHz spectrometer (9.4 T) or a Magritek Spinsolve Carbon 43 MHz benchtop NMR spectrometer (1 T). Between each hyperpolarization measurement, the headspace of the NMR tube was refreshed with p-H2 via the diffusion between the NMR tube headspace and a line filled with fresh p-H2. The sample was left to equilibrate for 10 s, and the procedure was repeated twice. This nonaggressive way of refreshing p-H2 was employed to reduce solvent evaporation and thereby maintain relative catalyst and substrate concentrations throughout.

Hyperpolarized Single-Shot T1 Measurement

The single-shot hyperpolarized T1 measurements were achieved by acquiring a series of 15 1H NMR spectra, where the excitation pulse for each acquisition was achieved using RF pulses of increasing flip angle (see the SI for more details). The variable flip angles were chosen to excite an equal fraction of the available magnetization at each step of the experiment in order to simplify the T1 analysis and optimize the signal-to-noise ratio. The variable time delays between acquisitions were chosen to ensure full coverage of the T1 decay curve. To remove the influence of thermally polarized background 1H NMR signals from the T1 analysis, a reference scan was acquired after each hyperpolarized T1 measurement. This was achieved by holding the sample outside of the NMR spectrometer for 1–1.5 min to ensure full relaxation of all polarization and then manually inserting the sample into the NMR spectrometer and carrying out a single-shot T1 experiment. The resultant thermally polarized NMR spectra were integrated and subtracted from the hyperpolarized signals prior to T1 analysis. Hyperpolarized relaxation times (T1) were determined from an exponential fit of the corrected hyperpolarized signal decay according to eq , where M(t) is magnetization, M0 is the initial magnetization, T1 is the time constant, t is the time since the application of the first RF pulse, and Moffset is the offset magnetization.Full details on the variable flip angle pulse sequence and the parameters used are available in the Supporting Information.

Results

Reactivity of [Ir(COD)(IMes)(4-AP)]Cl with H2 and 4-AP in MeOD

In order to prepare a SABRE active catalyst, a 5 mM concentration of the precatalyst with the general formula [Ir(Cl)(COD)(NHC)], where NHC is an N-heterocyclic carbene (complex 1 in Figure a), is mixed with an excess of the substrate. In this study, we used the substrate 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), a potassium channel blocker known as dalfampridine that is registered as a drug for walking improvement in patients with multiple sclerosis.[18] Once this substrate was added to the precatalyst, the chloride ion is displaced to form complex 2 (Figure a). When hydrogen gas was added to the resulting solution, complex 2 first oxidatively adds H2 to form the octahedral dihydride complex 3. The cyclooctadiene ligand in this complex was then hydrogenated to ultimately form cyclooctane (COA), which can no longer ligate. Consequently, the activated SABRE complex 4 was then formed in solution with three ligated molecules of 4-AP and two hydrides as shown in Figure a.[19] When monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy at room temperature, no peaks for complex 1 were detected at 6 min (first scan). However, the transformation from 2 to 4 can be monitored through their unique NHC proton resonances at 7.32 ppm (complex 2, cyan squares) and 6.96 ppm (complex 4, teal squares).
Figure 2

(a) Mechanism for the conversion of 1 to 4 in the presence of 4-AP and H2. First, 1 transforms into [Ir(COD)(IMes)(4-AP)]Cl (2), which then adds H2 to form the octahedral dihydride complex [Ir(H)2(COD)(IMes)(4-AP)]Cl (3), which is not stable at room temperature. COD hydrogenation then follows, and 3 converts to [Ir(H)2(IMes)(4-AP)3]Cl (4) by binding two more molecules of 4-AP. (b–d) Time-dependent relative signal intensities calculated from a series of 1H NMR spectra acquired over the course of the reaction at 298 K for a sample under 4 bar pressure of H2, where the initial concentrations of 1 and 4-AP are 5 and 25 mM, respectively. H2 was added, and the sample was shaken only once at the start of the experiment. (b) Evolution of the carbene ligand signals of 2 (square cyan) and 4 (square teal). (c) Evolution of the meta proton resonance of free and bound 4-AP (purple, gray, and green triangles). (d) Evolution of the ortho proton resonance of free and bound 4-AP (blue, gray, and orange circles).

(a) Mechanism for the conversion of 1 to 4 in the presence of 4-AP and H2. First, 1 transforms into [Ir(COD)(IMes)(4-AP)]Cl (2), which then adds H2 to form the octahedral dihydride complex [Ir(H)2(COD)(IMes)(4-AP)]Cl (3), which is not stable at room temperature. COD hydrogenation then follows, and 3 converts to [Ir(H)2(IMes)(4-AP)3]Cl (4) by binding two more molecules of 4-AP. (b–d) Time-dependent relative signal intensities calculated from a series of 1H NMR spectra acquired over the course of the reaction at 298 K for a sample under 4 bar pressure of H2, where the initial concentrations of 1 and 4-AP are 5 and 25 mM, respectively. H2 was added, and the sample was shaken only once at the start of the experiment. (b) Evolution of the carbene ligand signals of 2 (square cyan) and 4 (square teal). (c) Evolution of the meta proton resonance of free and bound 4-AP (purple, gray, and green triangles). (d) Evolution of the ortho proton resonance of free and bound 4-AP (blue, gray, and orange circles). This conversion can also be monitored via the ortho and meta proton resonances of 4-AP in complex 2 (gray circles and triangles), complex 4 (orange circles and green triangles), and free solution (blue circles and purple triangles). Figure presents the results of 1H NMR monitoring of the SABRE catalyst activation process over a period of 15.5 h at room temperature. Figure shows four representative NMR spectra obtained during the monitoring period. As illustrated in Figure b, full conversion of 2 (cyan squares) to 4 (teal squares) occurs after approximately 11 h. Compared to other studies,[14b,20] the formation of 4 from 2 with 4-AP is very slow. This is a reflection of the rate of addition of H2 to 2. By contrast, as described later in this paper, for the case of 4-MP, the formation of [Ir(H)2(IMes)(4-MP)3]Cl is much faster (Figure S4). This suggests that the intermediate dihydride complex forms much more rapidly when 4-MP is the substrate. Monitoring of the meta resonances of 4-AP (Figure c) confirms this conversion from 2 (gray triangles) to 4 (green triangles) while also demonstrating the consumption of 2 equivalents of 4-AP in free solution (purple triangles), as expected. In contrast, the ortho proton resonances of 4-AP show a different dependence on time (Figure d). The intensity of the ortho resonance of 4-AP in complex 4 increases initially, as expected, but decays at longer times. Similarly, the intensity of the ortho resonance of 4-AP in solution decays initially as expected but continues to decrease even after the formation of 4 is complete. These observations are consistent with the deuteration of the ortho positions of 4-AP (Scheme ), where the source of deuterium is the methanol-d4, which is used as the solvent. These results suggest that deuteration happens on the same time scale as catalyst activation, and an analysis of the relative intensities of the ortho and meta resonances of 4-AP indicate that the ortho position deuteration level reaches 75% by the end of the experiment (15.5 h). Further evidence for this ortho position deuteration was evident in the appearance of the corresponding 1H NMR spectra, where there were significant changes in the line-shape of the meta resonances of 4-AP (Figure S1). No deuteration of the meta positions was observed on the time scale of the experiment. Additional details and example spectra are provided in the Supporting Information.
Figure 3

1H NMR spectra recorded at 9.4 T associated with the data in Figure at the indicated time points with analogous color-coding to demonstrate speciation changes. It is noteworthy that the splitting on the meta signal for 4-AP (6.57 ppm) evolves into a singlet because of the deuteration of the ortho site (7.96 ppm) over the course of the reaction. The signals of interest are surrounded by the colored boxes. The dashed lines correspond with the carbene signals in catalysts 2 and 4.

Scheme 1

Deuteration of ortho Positions of 4-Aminopyridine in the Presence of Iridium Complexes 3 and 4 and H2 in Methanol-d4

1H NMR spectra recorded at 9.4 T associated with the data in Figure at the indicated time points with analogous color-coding to demonstrate speciation changes. It is noteworthy that the splitting on the meta signal for 4-AP (6.57 ppm) evolves into a singlet because of the deuteration of the ortho site (7.96 ppm) over the course of the reaction. The signals of interest are surrounded by the colored boxes. The dashed lines correspond with the carbene signals in catalysts 2 and 4.

Reaction Monitoring with SABRE

We seek to establish here that the SABRE-enhanced NMR response can be assessed through either the amplitude or the lifetime of the SABRE hyperpolarization. Both of these parameters have the potential to act as probes for reaction monitoring and require the collection of data at a series of reaction time points. The SABRE-lifetime measurements are themselves collected through a series of single-shot acquisitions that can be repeated on the time scale of five T1 periods, which means that a typical observation time reflects a couple of minutes.[10,21] The amplitude of the SABRE signal is expected to provide information on the activation process, because the degree of signal amplification will increase as the concentration of active catalyst 4 increases. However, the effect of substrate deuteration on this signal is expected to be complicated. Previous work by Rayner et al. has suggested that deuteration can lead to increased SABRE efficiency due to a lengthening of the lifetimes of the remaining 1H resonances within the substrate and the concentration of the SABRE hyperpolarization into fewer nuclei.[22] However, there is also potential for deuteration to decrease SABRE polarization transfer efficiency through changes to the J-coupling network that drive polarization transfer in the low-field regime.[11a,11b,22,23] Observations of the changes in the SABRE-enhanced 1H NMR signal intensity with time suggest that this parameter is sensitive to both of the chemical transformations under investigation (Figure S5). However, the interpretation of these effects is complicated by the fact that the SABRE response is not linearly dependent on substrate concentration in this case. In addition, any quantitative interpretation would be limited by the reproducibility of the SABRE response, which depends on many factors including p-H2 enrichment level, polarization transfer field, polarization build-up time, and sample transport time. Therefore, we focus here on the use of the lifetime of the SABRE hyperpolarization to monitor reactivity. The lifetime of the SABRE hyperpolarization is limited by longitudinal (T1) NMR relaxation times, which are sensitive to the chemical environment and have been widely used for identifying and characterizing inter and intramolecular interactions.[24] In this method, we exploit the fact that in the presence of the active SABRE catalyst, the substrate molecules in free solution and those bound to 4 are in rapid chemical exchange. As a result, the observed lifetime of the SABRE hyperpolarization reflects a weighted average of the lifetime for substrate molecules bound to 4 and substrate molecules in free solution.[25] NMR relaxation times are known to be significantly shorter for the bound substrate molecules.[25] Therefore, as the concentration of the active SABRE catalyst 4 increases, the observed hyperpolarization lifetime is expected to decrease. This shortening of the relaxation times in the presence of the activated complex is a well-known effect in the SABRE literature.[22,25] In addition, the observed lifetime of the SABRE hyperpolarization of the meta resonances of 4-AP is expected to increase following substitution of 2H for 1H in the adjacent ortho position (Scheme ).[22,26] Therefore, the time-dependent changes of the hyperpolarization lifetimes for the meta resonances of 4-AP are expected to reflect the competing effects of the formation of 4 and the partial deuteration of 4-AP. In contrast, the hyperpolarization lifetimes for the ortho resonances of 4-AP are expected to reflect only the formation of 4. This is because a 1H NMR signal will only be observed for the 1H ortho resonances of 4-aminopyridine and 4-amino-2-d1-pyridine. In both of these cases, the observed ortho1H hyperpolarization lifetime will be dominated by interactions with the 1H in the adjacent meta position and therefore is not expected to be affected significantly by the progress of the 1H2H exchange reaction.[22] Parallel measurements of non-hyperpolarized 1H NMR spectra and hyperpolarization lifetimes were performed as a function of time following the first addition of p-H2 with detection on a 400 MHz NMR spectrometer in methanol-d4 (Figure a and b). Non-hyperpolarized 1H NMR spectra indicate that the formation of 4 is complete by 230 min following the first addition of p-H2 (Figure a). This activation time is indicated by the vertical dashed lines in Figure b–d. Figure b shows the change in the ortho (blue circles) and meta (purple triangles) 1H hyperpolarization lifetimes as a function of time following the initial addition of p-H2. Each hyperpolarization-lifetime measurement is achieved using a manual shaking SABRE procedure with NMR detection at 9.4 T and where the p-H2 in the headspace of the NMR tube was refreshed between each measurement. In Figure b, the hyperpolarization lifetimes for the ortho resonances of 4-AP reduce and reach a plateau in a time period that corresponds to the formation of 4. In contrast, the lifetimes of the meta resonances show an initial rapid increase with a subsequent decrease at longer times. These observations support our hypothesis that the hyperpolarization lifetimes of the meta resonances are sensitive to both the formation of 4 and substrate deuteration, whereas the hyperpolarization lifetimes of the ortho resonances are sensitive only to the formation of 4. The initial change in the lifetime of the meta resonances indicates a more rapid incorporation of 2H into 4-AP when p-H2 was replenished between measurements rather than added once at the start of the experiment (Figure ). This increase in the rate of the HIE reaction is supported by the observed changes in the line shape of the meta resonances in the standard 1H NMR spectra acquired at 400 MHz (Figure S3).
Figure 4

(a) Non-hyperpolarized 1H NMR signal integrals of the 4-APmeta proton resonance, acquired in parallel with the hyperpolarization-lifetime measurements (b) at 400 MHz in methanol-d4. (b) Hyperpolarization signal lifetimes of the ortho (blue circles) and meta (purple triangles) proton resonances of 4-AP as a function of time after H2 addition in methanol-d4 at 9.4 T, (c) as (b) but recorded at 1 T and (d) as (c) but in protio methanol. The initial concentration of 4-AP is 25 mM, which gives a 2-fold excess relative to [Ir(H)2(IMes)(4-AP)3]Cl (5 mM) once its formation is complete. Error bars indicate the standard error from the fit to the hyperpolarization decay curve specified by eq . The time point for complete conversion to 4 is represented by the vertical line.

(a) Non-hyperpolarized 1H NMR signal integrals of the 4-APmeta proton resonance, acquired in parallel with the hyperpolarization-lifetime measurements (b) at 400 MHz in methanol-d4. (b) Hyperpolarization signal lifetimes of the ortho (blue circles) and meta (purple triangles) proton resonances of 4-AP as a function of time after H2 addition in methanol-d4 at 9.4 T, (c) as (b) but recorded at 1 T and (d) as (c) but in protio methanol. The initial concentration of 4-AP is 25 mM, which gives a 2-fold excess relative to [Ir(H)2(IMes)(4-AP)3]Cl (5 mM) once its formation is complete. Error bars indicate the standard error from the fit to the hyperpolarization decay curve specified by eq . The time point for complete conversion to 4 is represented by the vertical line. The use of SABRE hyperpolarization to increase sensitivity allows us to repeat this reaction monitoring procedure on a 1 T benchtop NMR spectrometer (Figure c). The time-dependent changes in hyperpolarization lifetime determined using the benchtop NMR instrument show the same trends as the experiments using a standard (9.4 T) NMR spectrometer. This illustrates that SABRE hyperpolarization can be used to enable reaction monitoring at both high- and low-field. In fact, here we use benchtop NMR where a combination of low sensitivity and peak overlap would normally prevent this monitoring process. Furthermore, once the sensitivity limitation is overcome through the use of hyperpolarization, there are additional benefits to using benchtop NMR. Because of its lower magnetic field strength, benchtop 1H NMR spectra can be acquired in the presence of a protonated solvent without the need to actively suppress the solvent signal. Indeed, it has been found that the SABRE-hyperpolarized NMR response from a low-concentration analyte can exceed that from a protonated solvent when detected at 1 T (43 MHz).[12b]Figure d shows the change in the ortho (blue circles) and meta (purple triangles) 1H hyperpolarization lifetimes as a function of time following the initial addition of p-H2 for the case where protio methanol is the solvent and a 1 T benchtop NMR spectrometer are used for detection. In the absence of the source of deuterium (methanol-d4) the hyperpolarization lifetimes of both the ortho and meta protons follow the same trend: a monotonic decrease to a plateau on the same time scale as the formation of the activated SABRE complex, 4. The absence of the initial increase in the meta hyperpolarization lifetime supports the hypothesis that this feature of the previous experiments originated from the deuteration effect. Therefore, not only does the use of SABRE hyperpolarization enable reaction monitoring using a benchtop NMR spectrometer, but also the use of this low-field (1 T) instrument provides a simple route to the deconvolution of the competing effects of SABRE catalyst activation and substrate deuteration. To further verify the method, we have applied it to an analogous SABRE system where the substrate is 4-methylpyridine (4-MP). When the reaction is monitored after a single exposure to H2, even though rapid formation of [Ir(H)2(IMes)(4-MP)3]Cl (∼50 min) is indicated, the time scale for deuteration is comparable to that with 4-AP. This suggests that [Ir(H)2(IMes)(4-AP)3]Cl is more active for the HIE reaction than [Ir(H)2(IMes)(4-MP)3]Cl (Figure S4). This difference in behavior is consistent with the predicted C–H bond strengths in the substrates on the basis of inductive changes. One further consequence of this behavior is that when the hyperpolarized lifetimes are probed over the first 65 min, rapid catalyst activation is observed with negligible deuteration. The analogous hyperpolarized lifetimes in protonated methanol exhibit the same trend, further supporting the deduction of the absence of significant deuteration on the time scale of the experiment (Figures S9 and S10).

Conclusions

We have introduced a method for using SABRE-enhanced 1H NMR spectroscopy to monitor reactivity, even at a mM concentration level, through the quantification of hyperpolarization lifetimes. This method was used to monitor the formation of the active SABRE catalyst from a precatalyst and hydrogen isotope exchange within the substrate, 4-aminopyridine. This method was demonstrated using both high-field (9.4 T, 400 MHz) and benchtop (1 T, 43 MHz) NMR detection. Comparable results were obtained at both fields, illustrating the utility of this approach for reaction monitoring on a benchtop NMR spectrometer even under conditions where thermal 1H NMR cannot be used due to low sensitivity and peak overlap. In addition, the use of a low-field benchtop NMR spectrometer for detection allowed experiments to be carried out in a protio solvent. For the reactivity explored herein, this provided a route to separating out the effects of the formation of the SABRE catalyst and the hydrogen isotope exchange reaction, by removing the source of 2H for the isotope exchange, methanol-d4. More generally, the ability to carry out reaction monitoring in a nondeuterated solvent renders this method more attractive for industrial applications where metal complexes are used to achieve high-value organic transformations, as it removes the need for costly sample preparation step prior to analysis.[27] The studies completed in this work followed reactivity under two different regimes within a sealed NMR tube: first, in the absence of stirring where slow diffusion of hydrogen across the gas–liquid interface is expected and second, where hydrogen in solution was replenished between experiments through vigorous shaking of the NMR tube. In future work, a flow-based SABRE approach, where p-H2 is bubbled through the solution outside of the spectrometer,[28] could provide a route to automating the reaction monitoring method and providing more control over the reaction conditions. In situ SABRE measurements, where detection is achieved in mT−μT magnetic fields such as the Earth’s magnetic field, could also be used to provide increased control over the reaction conditions throughout the monitoring process. However, in this case, there would be a need for reference measurements to isolate the source of the hyperpolarized response, as no chemical shift information is available in such ultralow-field NMR spectra. The quantitative aspects of the method can be improved by calibrating the hyperpolarization lifetimes to link changes in lifetime to changes in the concentration of the active SABRE species.
  46 in total

1.  Determination of long-range scalar (1)H-(1)H coupling constants responsible for polarization transfer in SABRE.

Authors:  Nan Eshuis; Ruud L E G Aspers; Bram J A van Weerdenburg; Martin C Feiters; Floris P J T Rutjes; Sybren S Wijmenga; Marco Tessari
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  A theoretical basis for spontaneous polarization transfer in non-hydrogenative parahydrogen-induced polarization.

Authors:  Ralph W Adams; Simon B Duckett; Richard A Green; David C Williamson; Gary G R Green
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Catalyst-Substrate Effects on Biocompatible SABRE Hyperpolarization.

Authors:  Anand Manoharan; Peter J Rayner; Marianna Fekete; Wissam Iali; Philip Norcott; V Hugh Perry; Simon B Duckett
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.102

4.  Toward nanomolar detection by NMR through SABRE hyperpolarization.

Authors:  Nan Eshuis; Niels Hermkens; Bram J A van Weerdenburg; Martin C Feiters; Floris P J T Rutjes; Sybren S Wijmenga; Marco Tessari
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Analysis of Molecular Interaction of Drugs within β-Cyclodextrin Cavity by Solution-State NMR Relaxation.

Authors:  Deepak Kumar; Yogeshwaran Krishnan; Manikandan Paranjothy; Samanwita Pal
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Desktop NMR spectroscopy for real-time monitoring of an acetalization reaction in comparison with gas chromatography and NMR at 9.4 T.

Authors:  Kawarpal Singh; Ernesto Danieli; Bernhard Blümich
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Late-stage deuteration of 13C-enriched substrates for T1 prolongation in hyperpolarized 13C MRI.

Authors:  Céline Taglang; David E Korenchan; Cornelius von Morze; Justin Yu; Chloé Najac; Sinan Wang; Joseph E Blecha; Sukumar Subramaniam; Robert Bok; Henry F VanBrocklin; Daniel B Vigneron; Sabrina M Ronen; Renuka Sriram; John Kurhanewicz; David M Wilson; Robert R Flavell
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 8.  Parahydrogen-Based Hyperpolarization for Biomedicine.

Authors:  Jan-Bernd Hövener; Andrey N Pravdivtsev; Bryce Kidd; C Russell Bowers; Stefan Glöggler; Kirill V Kovtunov; Markus Plaumann; Rachel Katz-Brull; Kai Buckenmaier; Alexej Jerschow; Francesca Reineri; Thomas Theis; Roman V Shchepin; Shawn Wagner; Pratip Bhattacharya; Niki M Zacharias; Eduard Y Chekmenev
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  Nanoscale Catalysts for NMR Signal Enhancement by Reversible Exchange.

Authors:  Fan Shi; Aaron M Coffey; Kevin W Waddell; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Boyd M Goodson
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.126

10.  Optimization of SABRE for polarization of the tuberculosis drugs pyrazinamide and isoniazid.

Authors:  Haifeng Zeng; Jiadi Xu; Joseph Gillen; Michael T McMahon; Dmitri Artemov; Jean-Max Tyburn; Joost A B Lohman; Ryan E Mewis; Kevin D Atkinson; Gary G R Green; Simon B Duckett; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  9 in total

1.  Density Functional Theory Study of Reaction Equilibria in Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange.

Authors:  Kailai Lin; Patrick TomHon; Sören Lehmkuhl; Raul Laasner; Thomas Theis; Volker Blum
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 3.102

2.  Coherent Evolution of Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange in Two Alternating Fields (alt-SABRE).

Authors:  Andrey N Pravdivtsev; Nicolas Kempf; Markus Plaumann; Johannes Bernarding; Klaus Scheffler; Jan-Bernd Hövener; Kai Buckenmaier
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.520

Review 3.  Advancing homogeneous catalysis for parahydrogen-derived hyperpolarisation and its NMR applications.

Authors:  Ben J Tickner; Vladimir V Zhivonitko
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 9.969

4.  Deactivation of catalysts in simultaneous reversible and irreversible parahydrogen NMR signal enhancement, and the role of co-ligands in the stabilization of the reversible method.

Authors:  Adam Mames; Sylwia Jopa; Mariusz Pietrzak; Tomasz Ratajczyk
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  Synthesis and 15 N NMR Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange of [15 N]Dalfampridine at Microtesla Magnetic Fields.

Authors:  Nikita V Chukanov; Oleg G Salnikov; Ivan A Trofimov; Mohammad S H Kabir; Kirill V Kovtunov; Igor V Koptyug; Eduard Y Chekmenev
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.102

6.  Low-Cost High-Pressure Clinical-Scale 50% Parahydrogen Generator Using Liquid Nitrogen at 77 K.

Authors:  Benjamin Chapman; Baptiste Joalland; Collier Meersman; Jessica Ettedgui; Rolf E Swenson; Murali C Krishna; Panayiotis Nikolaou; Kirill V Kovtunov; Oleg G Salnikov; Igor V Koptyug; Max E Gemeinhardt; Boyd M Goodson; Roman V Shchepin; Eduard Y Chekmenev
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 8.008

7.  Hyperpolarization of Nitrile Compounds Using Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange.

Authors:  Sarah Kim; Sein Min; Heelim Chae; Hye Jin Jeong; Sung Keon Namgoong; Sangwon Oh; Keunhong Jeong
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Probing the Hydrogenation of Vinyl Sulfoxides Using para-Hydrogen.

Authors:  Ben J Tickner; Rachel R Parker; Adrian C Whitwood; Simon B Duckett
Journal:  Organometallics       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Rapid 13C NMR hyperpolarization delivered from para-hydrogen enables the low concentration detection and quantification of sugars.

Authors:  Peter M Richardson; Wissam Iali; Soumya S Roy; Peter J Rayner; Meghan E Halse; Simon B Duckett
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 9.825

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.