Literature DB >> 30985064

Biostimulatory effects of polydioxanone, poly-d, l lactic acid, and polycaprolactone fillers in mouse model.

Tae-Rin Kwon1, Sung Won Han1,2, In Kwon Yeo1,2, Jong Hwan Kim1,2, Jae Min Kim1,2, Ji-Yeon Hong1,2, Byung-Chul Lee1, Sung-Eun Lee1, Ho Sang Moon3, Han Jin Kwon3, Beom Joon Kim1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous fillers are increasingly used for augmentation of volume loss and relaxation of facial wrinkles. Collagen stimulators are the latest next-generation dermal fillers that can induce neocollagenesis. To investigate biophysical characteristics, safety, and efficacy of newly developed polydioxanone (PDO) filler in comparison with poly-l lactic acid (PLLA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) fillers.
METHODS: In vitro assay, morphology of particles, and rheological property of fillers were measured. A total of 24 female hairless mice (SKH1-Hrhr ) were randomly divided into three groups and injected with PDO, PLLA, or PCL fillers. Durability of fillers was assessed at 0, 3 days, and 1, 4, 8, 12 weeks after injection using folliscope and PRIMOS. To determine biocompatibility and neocollagenesis, histologic evaluation was performed at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after injection. Efficacy was also evaluated based on skin surface roughness changes using PRIMOS in a hairless mouse photoaging model.
RESULTS: In the particle morphology test, PDO microspheres had an irregular surface and were spherical and uniformly sized. PDO filler demonstrated similar neocollagenesis and inflammatory response to other collagen stimulators. PDO filler showed better biodegradability than PLLA and PCL fillers. In the hairless mouse photoaging model, there was a statistically significant decrease in skin surface roughness after PDO filler injection.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that newly developed collagen stimulating PDO filler might be a safe and effective option for correction of volume loss and rejuvenation of photoaging skin.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  l lactic acid; neocollagenesis; poly-d; polycaprolactone; polydioxanone

Year:  2019        PMID: 30985064     DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol        ISSN: 1473-2130            Impact factor:   2.696


  5 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of Physical Characteristics and Preclinical Data of a Novel Monodisperse Polycaprolactone Microspheres Filler.

Authors:  Yimeng Chai; Facheng Li
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 2.  Critical Review on Polylactic Acid: Properties, Structure, Processing, Biocomposites, and Nanocomposites.

Authors:  Lalit Ranakoti; Brijesh Gangil; Sandip Kumar Mishra; Tej Singh; Shubham Sharma; R A Ilyas; Samah El-Khatib
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Effect of Hyaluronic Acid and Poly-L-Lactic Acid Dermal Fillers on Collagen Synthesis: An in vitro and in vivo Study.

Authors:  Larissa Rocha Bertelli Cabral; Lucas Novaes Teixeira; Rodrigo Pinto Gimenez; Ana Paula Dias Demasi; Rui Barbosa de Brito Junior; Vera Cavalcanti de Araújo; Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2020-09-29

4.  Double-layered Nanofibrous Patch for Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage and Peritoneal Adhesions, Experimental Study.

Authors:  Jachym Rosendorf; Marketa Klicova; Lenka Cervenkova; Richard Palek; Jana Horakova; Andrea Klapstova; Petr Hosek; Vladimira Moulisova; Lukas Bednar; Vaclav Tegl; Ondrej Brzon; Zbynek Tonar; Vladislav Treska; David Lukas; Vaclav Liska
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Gelatin/Polycaprolactone Electrospun Nanofibrous Membranes: The Effect of Composition and Physicochemical Properties on Postoperative Cardiac Adhesion.

Authors:  Xingang Wang; Li Xiang; Yongxuan Peng; Zihao Dai; Yuqing Hu; Xiaoting Pan; Xingliang Zhou; Hao Zhang; Bei Feng
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.