| Literature DB >> 30981207 |
Vladimir N Anisimov1, Irina F Labunets2, Irina G Popovich1, Margarita L Tyndyk1, Maria N Yurova1, Alexey G Golubev1.
Abstract
IGF1 signaling is supposedly a key lifespan determinant in metazoans. However, controversial lifespan data were obtained with different means used to modify IGF1 or its receptor (IGF1R) expression in mice. The emerging puzzle lacks pieces of evidence needed to construct a coherent picture. We add to the available evidence by using the Gompertz model (GM), with account for the artifactual component of the Strehler-Mildvan correlation between its parameters, to compare the survival patterns of female FVB/N and FVB/N-derived K14/mIGF1 mice. In K14/mIGF1 vs. FVB/N mice, the rate of aging (γ) is markedly increased without concomitant changes in the initial mortality (μ0). In published cases where IGF1 signaling was altered by modifying liver or muscle IGF1 or whole body IGF1R expression, lifespan changes are attributable to μ0. The accelerated aging and associated tumor yield in K14/mIGF1 mice are consistent with the finding that the age-associated decreases in thymus weight and serum thymulin are accelerated in K14/mIGF1 mice. Our results underscore the importance of accounting for the mathematical artifacts of data fitting to GM in attempts to resolve discrepancies in survival data and to differentiate the contributions of the initial mortality and the rate of aging to changes in lifespan.Entities:
Keywords: Gompertz model; IGF1; Strehler-Mildvan correlation; age-related-diseases; aging; cancer; papilloma; parametric analysis; survival pattern; thymulin; thymus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30981207 PMCID: PMC6503882 DOI: 10.18632/aging.101903
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1Body and spleen weights (the upper panel) and thymus weight and serum thymulin titer (the lower panel) in the cohorts of female K14/mIGF1 and WT FVB/N mice. Body weight and thymulin titer data are multiplied by 10 to better accommodate all data to the respective panels. To avoid encumbering, shown are only the 95% confidence intervals that suggest significant differences between K14/mIGF1 and WT FVB/N mice (the lower panel) and the lack of significant differences in the spleen weights of the two strains (the upper panel). K14/mIGF1 mice are presented with dashed lines and open markers, except for thymulin data markers (filled black diamonds). FVB/N mice are presented with dotted lines and filled gray markers. No comparison between K14/mIGF1 and FVB/N data are possible after ages above 18 months because the former mice do not live thus long.
Figure 2Survival patterns of K14/IGF1 mice (IGF1, dashed line) and WT FVB mice (solid line). Data points associated with postmortem tumor detection are shade-coded. Smooth lines show survival data approximations with the Gomperz model (GM).
Survival parameters in female WT FVB/N and K14/IGF1 mice.
| WT FVB/N | K14/mIGF1 | Difference | ||
| Maximum lifespan, days | 993 | 770 | –22.5% | |
| Median lifespan, days | 683 | 484 | –29% | |
| Mean lifespan, days (mean±SD) | All | 622±227 | 469±156 | –25%, p<0.01 |
| The last 10% survivors | 921±36 | 714±35 | –22%, p<0.01 | |
| Initial mortality | 0.00014 | 0.00013 | 0% | |
| Aging rate | 0.0049 | 0.0077 | +57%, | |
Spontaneous tumors found in the cohorts of female K14/mIGF1 and WT FVB/N mice over their whole lifespans.
| Papilloma | 2 | 12a |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 2 | 5 |
| Harderian gland cystadenosarcoma cystadenocarcinoma | 1 | 0 |
| Lung adenocarcinoma | 9 | 2 |
| Lung adenomab | 0 | 1 |
| Lung carcinosarcoma | 0 | 1 |
| Lymphoma | 5 | 0 |
| Mammary adenocarcinoma | 0 | 1 |
| Mesenterial angiomab | 0 | 1 |
| Ovarian serous cystsb | 1 | 0 |
| Uterine angiosarcoma | 0 | 1 |
| Uterine granulosa cell tumorb | 1 | 0 |
a p<0.01 (exact Fisher test)
b benign tumors
Figure 3Kaplan-Meyer plots constructed upon censoring for the death cases that are not associated with any postmortem tumor detection. (A) or not associated with a postmortem tumor other than papilloma (B).
Figure 4Correlations between GM parameters ( (i) control mice used in IGF1 signaling experiments performed in different labs (see references to Figure 5), (ii) female mice bread at Jackson Laboratories, and (iii) several samples of female 129/Sv mice bread at authors’ laboratory [20]. The cross (Holz) in the upper left corner highlights the point related to female 129/Sv mice studied by Holzenberger et al. [12] and confirms the general consistency of the female 129/Sv trend, which is shown with gray round markers.
Figure 5The plots of The heads of vectors are directed towards increased IGF1 signaling. The numbers at vector heads show reported percent changes in the median lifespans. Thin lines show the reference regressions of μ on γ, related to controls described in these publications and to 129/Sv mice (the same as in Figure 4). Crosshairs show 95% CI for the estimates of GM parameters. To avoid cluttering, crosshairs are added only to selected data points that illustrate the whole range of the CIs. (A) Different promoters were used to modify IGF1 expression. Hammerheads: decreased lifespans. Arrows: increased lifespans. References: Gong [10]; Li [8]; Ashp [9]. (B) IGF1R++ and IGF1R+- mice were compared. Hammerheads: females. Arrows: males. References: Holz [12]; Bok [11]; Xu [34].