Elham Kayvanpour1,2, Farbod Sedaghat-Hamedani1,2, Weng-Tein Gi1,2, Oguz Firat Tugrul1,2, Ali Amr1,2, Jan Haas1,2, Feng Zhu1,3, Philipp Ehlermann1, Lorenz Uhlmann4, Hugo A Katus1,2, Benjamin Meder5,6,7. 1. Department of Medicine III, Institute for Cardiomyopathy, University of Heidelberg, INF 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. 2. DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Berlin, Germany. 3. Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022, Wuhan, China. 4. Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 5. Department of Medicine III, Institute for Cardiomyopathy, University of Heidelberg, INF 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Benjamin.Meder@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 6. DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Berlin, Germany. Benjamin.Meder@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 7. Department of Genetics, Stanford Genome Technology Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Benjamin.Meder@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular non-compaction has been increasingly diagnosed in recent years. However, it is still debated whether non-compaction is a pathological condition or a physiological trait. In this meta-analysis and systematic review, we compare studies, which investigated these two different perspectives. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive overview on the clinical outcome as well as genetic background of left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy in adult patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrieved PubMed/Medline literatures in English language from 2000 to 19/09/2018 on clinical outcome and genotype of patients with non-compaction. We summarized and extensively reviewed all studies that passed selection criteria and performed a meta-analysis on key phenotypic parameters. Altogether, 35 studies with 2271 non-compaction patients were included in our meta-analysis. The mean age at diagnosis was the mid of their fifth decade. Two-thirds of patients were male. Congenital heart diseases including atrial or ventricular septum defect or Ebstein anomaly were reported in 7% of patients. Twenty-four percent presented with family history of cardiomyopathy. The mean frequency of neuromuscular diseases was 5%. Heart rhythm abnormalities were reported frequently: conduction disease in 26%, supraventricular tachycardia in 17%, and sustained or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in 18% of patients. Three important outcome measures were reported including systemic thromboembolic events with a mean frequency of 9%, heart transplantation with 4%, and adequate ICD therapy with 15%. Nine studies investigated the genetics of non-compaction cardiomyopathy. The most frequently mutated gene was TTN with a pooled frequency of 11%. The average frequency of MYH7 mutations was 9%, for MYBPC3 mutations 5%, and for CASQ2 and LDB3 3% each. TPM1, MIB1, ACTC1, and LMNA mutations had an average frequency of 2% each. Mutations in PLN, HCN4, TAZ, DTNA, TNNT2, and RBM20 were reported with a frequency of 1% each. We also summarized the results of eight studies investigating the non-compaction in altogether 5327 athletes, pregnant women, patients with sickle cell disease, as well as individuals from population-based cohorts, in which the presence of left ventricular hypertrabeculation ranged from 1.3 to 37%. CONCLUSION: The summarized data indicate that non-compaction may lead to unfavorable outcome in different cardiomyopathy entities. The presence of key features in a multimodal diagnostic approach could distinguish between benign morphological trait and manifest cardiomyopathy.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular non-compaction has been increasingly diagnosed in recent years. However, it is still debated whether non-compaction is a pathological condition or a physiological trait. In this meta-analysis and systematic review, we compare studies, which investigated these two different perspectives. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive overview on the clinical outcome as well as genetic background of left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy in adult patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrieved PubMed/Medline literatures in English language from 2000 to 19/09/2018 on clinical outcome and genotype of patients with non-compaction. We summarized and extensively reviewed all studies that passed selection criteria and performed a meta-analysis on key phenotypic parameters. Altogether, 35 studies with 2271 non-compaction patients were included in our meta-analysis. The mean age at diagnosis was the mid of their fifth decade. Two-thirds of patients were male. Congenital heart diseases including atrial or ventricular septum defect or Ebstein anomaly were reported in 7% of patients. Twenty-four percent presented with family history of cardiomyopathy. The mean frequency of neuromuscular diseases was 5%. Heart rhythm abnormalities were reported frequently: conduction disease in 26%, supraventricular tachycardia in 17%, and sustained or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in 18% of patients. Three important outcome measures were reported including systemic thromboembolic events with a mean frequency of 9%, heart transplantation with 4%, and adequate ICD therapy with 15%. Nine studies investigated the genetics of non-compaction cardiomyopathy. The most frequently mutated gene was TTN with a pooled frequency of 11%. The average frequency of MYH7 mutations was 9%, for MYBPC3 mutations 5%, and for CASQ2 and LDB3 3% each. TPM1, MIB1, ACTC1, and LMNA mutations had an average frequency of 2% each. Mutations in PLN, HCN4, TAZ, DTNA, TNNT2, and RBM20 were reported with a frequency of 1% each. We also summarized the results of eight studies investigating the non-compaction in altogether 5327 athletes, pregnant women, patients with sickle cell disease, as well as individuals from population-based cohorts, in which the presence of left ventricular hypertrabeculation ranged from 1.3 to 37%. CONCLUSION: The summarized data indicate that non-compaction may lead to unfavorable outcome in different cardiomyopathy entities. The presence of key features in a multimodal diagnostic approach could distinguish between benign morphological trait and manifest cardiomyopathy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Clinical outcome; Genetic background; Left ventricular non-compaction
Authors: Ross T Murphy; Rajesh Thaman; Juan Gimeno Blanes; Deirdre Ward; Elias Sevdalis; Efi Papra; Anatoli Kiotsekoglou; Anatoli Kiotsekolglou; Maria T Tome; Denis Pellerin; William J McKenna; Perry M Elliott Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2004-11-30 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Richard Kobza; Jan Steffel; Paul Erne; Andreas W Schoenenberger; David Hürlimann; Thomas F Lüscher; Rolf Jenni; Firat Duru Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-05-21 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Christine H Attenhofer Jost; Heidi M Connolly; Carole A Warnes; Patrick O'leary; A Jamil Tajik; Patricia A Pellikka; James B Seward Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Kazuki Kodo; Sang-Ging Ong; Fereshteh Jahanbani; Vittavat Termglinchan; Keiichi Hirono; Kolsoum InanlooRahatloo; Antje D Ebert; Praveen Shukla; Oscar J Abilez; Jared M Churko; Ioannis Karakikes; Gwanghyun Jung; Fukiko Ichida; Sean M Wu; Michael P Snyder; Daniel Bernstein; Joseph C Wu Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Farbod Sedaghat-Hamedani; Jan Haas; Feng Zhu; Christian Geier; Elham Kayvanpour; Martin Liss; Alan Lai; Karen Frese; Regina Pribe-Wolferts; Ali Amr; Daniel Tian Li; Omid Shirvani Samani; Avisha Carstensen; Diana Martins Bordalo; Marion Müller; Christine Fischer; Jing Shao; Jing Wang; Ming Nie; Li Yuan; Sabine Haßfeld; Christine Schwartz; Min Zhou; Zihua Zhou; Yanwen Shu; Min Wang; Kai Huang; Qiutang Zeng; Longxian Cheng; Tobias Fehlmann; Philipp Ehlermann; Andreas Keller; Christoph Dieterich; Katrin Streckfuß-Bömeke; Yuhua Liao; Michael Gotthardt; Hugo A Katus; Benjamin Meder Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Perry Wengrofsky; Christopher Armenia; Filip Oleszak; Eric Kupferstein; Chandra Rednam; Cristina A Mitre; Samy I McFarlane Journal: EC Clin Exp Anat Date: 2019-07-29
Authors: Jaap I van Waning; Kadir Caliskan; Raluca G Chelu; Nikki van der Velde; Andrea Pezzato; Michelle Michels; Marjon A van Slegtenhorst; Eric Boersma; Koen Nieman; Danielle Majoor-Krakauer; Alexander Hirsch Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Roman Myasnikov; Andreas Brodehl; Alexey Meshkov; Olga Kulikova; Anna Kiseleva; Greta Marie Pohl; Evgeniia Sotnikova; Mikhail Divashuk; Marina Klimushina; Anastasia Zharikova; Maria Pokrovskaya; Sergey Koretskiy; Maria Kharlap; Elena Mershina; Valentin Sinitsyn; Elena Basargina; Leila Gandaeva; Vladimir Barskiy; Sergey Boytsov; Hendrik Milting; Oxana Drapkina Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Ann-Kathrin Rahm; Patrick Lugenbiel; Marco Ochs; Benjamin Meder; Dierk Thomas; Hugo A Katus; Eberhard Scholz Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 5.460