BACKGROUND: Patients with left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) have an increased risk for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. The benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in these patients has been investigated only in small series. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to analyze the clinical outcome of a larger population of patients with LVNC who were treated with an ICD. METHODS: Thirty patients (mean age 48 ± 14) with LVNC who underwent ICD implantation for secondary (n = 12) or primary (n = 18) prevention were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 40 ± 34 months. RESULTS: During follow-up, 11 patients (37%) presented with appropriate ICD therapies: three with antitachycardia pacing, four with ICD shocks, and four with both antitachycardia pacing and ICD shocks. Of these 11 patients, five received the ICD for secondary prevention and six for primary prevention. In six patients, in whom a biventricular ICD was implanted, functional New York Heart Association (NYHA) class improved from 2.5 ± 0.5 to 1.6 ± 0.8. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, with the largest cohort of LVNC patients with ICD to date, we demonstrate that such therapy is effective in these patients with an indication for secondary or primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. However, no clinical predictors for appropriate ICD therapy could have been elaborated in these patients. Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves functional NYHA class in patients with LVNC and may hence be considered in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% and signs of ventricular dyssynchrony.
BACKGROUND:Patients with left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) have an increased risk for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. The benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in these patients has been investigated only in small series. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to analyze the clinical outcome of a larger population of patients with LVNC who were treated with an ICD. METHODS: Thirty patients (mean age 48 ± 14) with LVNC who underwent ICD implantation for secondary (n = 12) or primary (n = 18) prevention were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 40 ± 34 months. RESULTS: During follow-up, 11 patients (37%) presented with appropriate ICD therapies: three with antitachycardia pacing, four with ICD shocks, and four with both antitachycardia pacing and ICD shocks. Of these 11 patients, five received the ICD for secondary prevention and six for primary prevention. In six patients, in whom a biventricular ICD was implanted, functional New York Heart Association (NYHA) class improved from 2.5 ± 0.5 to 1.6 ± 0.8. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, with the largest cohort of LVNC patients with ICD to date, we demonstrate that such therapy is effective in these patients with an indication for secondary or primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. However, no clinical predictors for appropriate ICD therapy could have been elaborated in these patients. Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves functional NYHA class in patients with LVNC and may hence be considered in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% and signs of ventricular dyssynchrony.
Authors: Jin Li; Jennifer Franke; Regina Pribe-Wolferts; Benjamin Meder; Philipp Ehlermann; Derliz Mereles; Florian Andre; Mohamed Assem Abdelrazek; Constanze Merten; Patrick A Schweizer; Rüdiger Becker; Hugo A Katus; Dierk Thomas Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Steve W Leung; Claude-Samy Elayi; Richard J Charnigo; Mushabbar A Syed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Elham Kayvanpour; Farbod Sedaghat-Hamedani; Weng-Tein Gi; Oguz Firat Tugrul; Ali Amr; Jan Haas; Feng Zhu; Philipp Ehlermann; Lorenz Uhlmann; Hugo A Katus; Benjamin Meder Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 5.460