Maike E Lindemann1, Nika Guberina2, Axel Wetter2, Wolfgang P Fendler3, Bjoern Jakoby4,5, Harald H Quick4,6. 1. High-Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany maike.lindemann@uk-essen.de. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. 4. High-Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. 5. Siemens MR, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany; and. 6. Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Abstract
A limitation of using 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) for detection and staging of prostate cancer is a frequently observed halo artifact around the urinary bladder caused by inaccurate scatter correction (SC) of PET data. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of unrenormalized absolute SC on 68Ga-PSMA PET quantification in PET/MRI of the prostate in 100 patients. Methods: The PET data of 100 patients were reconstructed twice using standard SC and improved unrenormalized SC. The visual presence of the halo artifact was rated in each PET data reconstruction using 5 grades (0, no halo artifact; 4, severe halo artifact). The number of visible lesions in the pelvis was recorded. SUVmean and SUVmax were measured in the lesions, in the bladder, in the gluteus maximus, and within the halo margin. Furthermore, the signal-to-noise-ratio and image noise were measured in all PET data. Relative differences between standard and unrenormalized SC were calculated. Results: With standard SC, the average grade in the presence of the halo artifact was 2 (moderate halo artifact), whereas for unrenormalized SC, the average grade was 0.9 (slight halo artifact). The same number of congruent lesions (n = 74) was detected for both PET data reconstructions. Relative changes in PET signal-to-noise-ratio and image noise were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The mean (±SD) increase in SUVmean using unrenormalized SC was 23.0% ± 9.2% in the gluteus maximus, 7.1% ± 4.5% in the bladder, 325.4% ± 748.5% in the halo margin, and 12.4% ± 16.8% in all 74 detected lesions. The mean increase using unrenormalized SC in SUVmean was 17.5% for lesions inside the halo margin (38 lesions) and 6.9% for lesions outside the halo margin (36 lesions). Conclusion: For PET/MRI of prostate cancer using 68Ga-PSMA, a proper SC is important to ensure the best possible diagnostic quality and PET quantification. Unrenormalized absolute SC significantly reduces the halo artifact around the bladder and improves PET/MRI of the prostate.
A limitation of using 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) for detection and staging of prostate cancer is a frequently observed halo artifact around the urinary bladder caused by inaccurate scatter correction (SC) of PET data. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of unrenormalized absolute SC on 68Ga-PSMA PET quantification in PET/MRI of the prostate in 100 patients. Methods: The PET data of 100 patients were reconstructed twice using standard SC and improved unrenormalized SC. The visual presence of the halo artifact was rated in each PET data reconstruction using 5 grades (0, no halo artifact; 4, severe halo artifact). The number of visible lesions in the pelvis was recorded. SUVmean and SUVmax were measured in the lesions, in the bladder, in the gluteus maximus, and within the halo margin. Furthermore, the signal-to-noise-ratio and image noise were measured in all PET data. Relative differences between standard and unrenormalized SC were calculated. Results: With standard SC, the average grade in the presence of the halo artifact was 2 (moderate halo artifact), whereas for unrenormalized SC, the average grade was 0.9 (slight halo artifact). The same number of congruent lesions (n = 74) was detected for both PET data reconstructions. Relative changes in PET signal-to-noise-ratio and image noise were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The mean (±SD) increase in SUVmean using unrenormalized SC was 23.0% ± 9.2% in the gluteus maximus, 7.1% ± 4.5% in the bladder, 325.4% ± 748.5% in the halo margin, and 12.4% ± 16.8% in all 74 detected lesions. The mean increase using unrenormalized SC in SUVmean was 17.5% for lesions inside the halo margin (38 lesions) and 6.9% for lesions outside the halo margin (36 lesions). Conclusion: For PET/MRI of prostate cancer using 68Ga-PSMA, a proper SC is important to ensure the best possible diagnostic quality and PET quantification. Unrenormalized absolute SC significantly reduces the halo artifact around the bladder and improves PET/MRI of the prostate.
Authors: Hong Grafe; Maike E Lindemann; Verena Ruhlmann; Mark Oehmigen; Nader Hirmas; Lale Umutlu; Ken Herrmann; Harald H Quick Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Borjana Bogdanovic; Andrei Gafita; Sylvia Schachoff; Matthias Eiber; Jorge Cabello; Wolfgang A Weber; Stephan G Nekolla Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 9.236