Literature DB >> 30979521

ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis.

James L Buxbaum1, Syed M Abbas Fehmi2, Shahnaz Sultan3, Douglas S Fishman4, Bashar J Qumseya5, Victoria K Cortessis1, Hannah Schilperoort6, Lynn Kysh6, Lea Matsuoka7, Patrick Yachimski8, Deepak Agrawal9, Suryakanth R Gurudu10, Laith H Jamil11, Terry L Jue12, Mouen A Khashab13, Joanna K Law14, Jeffrey K Lee15, Mariam Naveed16, Mandeep S Sawhney17, Nirav Thosani18, Julie Yang19, Sachin B Wani20.   

Abstract

Each year choledocholithiasis results in biliary obstruction, cholangitis, and pancreatitis in a significant number of patients. The primary treatment, ERCP, is minimally invasive but associated with adverse events in 6% to 15%. This American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Standard of Practice (SOP) Guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the endoscopic evaluation and treatment of choledocholithiasis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to rigorously review and synthesize the contemporary literature regarding the following topics: EUS versus MRCP for diagnosis, the role of early ERCP in gallstone pancreatitis, endoscopic papillary dilation after sphincterotomy versus sphincterotomy alone for large bile duct stones, and impact of ERCP-guided intraductal therapy for large and difficult choledocholithiasis. Comprehensive systematic reviews were also performed to assess the following: same-admission cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis, clinical predictors of choledocholithiasis, optimal timing of ERCP vis-à-vis cholecystectomy, management of Mirizzi syndrome and hepatolithiasis, and biliary stent therapy for choledocholithiasis. Core clinical questions were derived using an iterative process by the ASGE SOP Committee. This body developed all recommendations founded on the certainty of the evidence, balance of risks and harms, consideration of stakeholder preferences, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30979521     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  42 in total

1.  Contemporary management of concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a survey of Spanish surgeons.

Authors:  Rosa Jorba; Mihai C Pavel; Erik Llàcer-Millán; Laia Estalella; Mar Achalandabaso; Elisabet Julià-Verdaguer; Esther Nve; Erlinda D Padilla-Zegarra; Josep M Badia; Donal B O'Connor; Robert Memba
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the 2010 ASGE non-invasive predictors of choledocholithiasis and comparison to the 2019 ASGE predictors.

Authors:  Louie Wang; Sarah Mirzaie; Tavit Dunnsiri; Formosa Chen; Holly Wilhalme; Ian T MacQueen; Henry Cryer; Anaar Eastoak-Siletz; Michelle Guan; Callie Cuff; James H Tabibian
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-24

3.  Machine learning models compared to existing criteria for noninvasive prediction of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-confirmed choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Camellia Dalai; John Azizian; Harry Trieu; Anand Rajan; Formosa Chen; Tien Dong; Simon Beaven; James H Tabibian
Journal:  Liver Res       Date:  2021-10-22

Review 4.  Destiny for Rendezvous: Is Cholecysto/Choledocholithiasis Better Treated with Dual- or Single-Step Procedures?

Authors:  S Vaccari; M Minghetti; A Lauro; M I Bellini; A Ussia; S Khouzam; I R Marino; M Cervellera; V D'Andrea; V Tonini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Routine preoperative MRCP in screening choledocholithiasis in acute cholecystitis compared to selective approach: a population-based study.

Authors:  Anne Mattila; Emilia Pynnönen; Antti Sironen; Eeva Elomaa; Johanna Mrena; Aapo Jalkanen; Mika Nevalainen; Olli Helminen
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-10-07

6.  Utilizing CT to identify clinically significant biliary dilatation in symptomatic post-cholecystectomy patients: when should we be worried?

Authors:  Imo I Uko; Cecil Wood; Edward Nguyen; Annie Huang; Roberta Catania; Amir A Borhani; Jeanne M Horowitz; Helena Gabriel; Rajesh Keswani; Paul Nikolaidis; Frank H Miller; Linda C Kelahan
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-09-15

7.  Suspected common bile duct stones: reduction of unnecessary ERCP by pre-procedural imaging and timing of ERCP.

Authors:  Christina J Sperna Weiland; Evelien C Verschoor; Alexander C Poen; Xavier J M N Smeets; Niels G Venneman; Abha Bhalla; Ben J M Witteman; Hester C Timmerhuis; Devica S Umans; Jeanin E van Hooft; Marco J Bruno; P Fockens; Robert C Verdonk; Joost P H Drenth; Erwin J M van Geenen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.453

8.  Impact of Early Cholecystectomy on the Cost of Treating Mild Gallstone Pancreatitis: Gallstone PANC Trial.

Authors:  Kayla D Isbell; Shuyan Wei; Shah-Jahan M Dodwad; Elenir Bc Avritscher; Krislynn M Mueck; Karla Bernardi; Gabrielle E Hatton; Mike K Liang; Tien C Ko; Lillian S Kao
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Do endosonographers agree on the presence of bile duct sludge and the subsequent need for intervention?

Authors:  Rutger Quispel; Hannah M Schutz; Nora D Hallensleben; Abha Bhalla; Robin Timmer; Jeanin E van Hooft; Niels G Venneman; Nicole S Erler; Bart J Veldt; Lydi M J W van Driel; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27

10.  An Unusual Case of Countless Biliary Stones.

Authors:  Tarek Nammour; Manar Shmais; Assaad Soweid
Journal:  ACG Case Rep J       Date:  2021-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.