Literature DB >> 30976479

Excitation Energy-Transfer Processes in the Sensitization Luminescence of Europium in a Highly Luminescent Complex.

Yan-Jie Huang1, Can Ke1, Li-Min Fu2, Yu Li3, Shu-Feng Wang3, Ying-Chao Ma2, Jan-Ping Zhang2, Yuan Wang1.   

Abstract

The excitation energy transfer (EET) pathways in the sensitization luminescence of EuIII and the excitation energy migration between the different ligands in [Eu(fod)3dpbt] [where fod=6,6,7,7,8,8,8-heptafluoro-2,2-dimethyl-3,5-octanedione and dpbt=2-(N,N-diethylanilin-4-yl)-4,6-bis(3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl)-1,3,5-triazine], exhibiting well-separated fluorescence excitation and phosphorescence bands of the different ligands, were investigated by using time-resolved luminescence spectroscopy for the first time. The data clearly revealed that upon the excitation of dpbt, the sensitization luminescence of EuIII in [Eu(fod)3dpbt] was dominated by the singlet EET pathway, whereas the triplet EET pathway involving T1(dpbt) was inefficient. The energy migration from T1(dpbt) to T1(fod) in [Eu(fod)3dpbt] was not observed. Moreover, upon the excitation of fod, a singlet EET pathway for the sensitization of EuIII luminescence, including the energy migration from S1(fod) to S1(dpbt) was revealed, in addition to the triplet EET pathway involving T1(fod). Under the excitation of dpbt at 410 nm, [Eu(fod)3dpbt] exhibited an absolute quantum yield for EuIII luminescence of 0.59 at 298 K. This work provides a solid and elegant example for the concept that singlet EET pathway could dominate the sensitization luminescence of EuIII in some complexes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Europium; energy transfer; sensitization luminescence; singlet pathway; time-resolved spectroscopy

Year:  2019        PMID: 30976479      PMCID: PMC6438127          DOI: 10.1002/open.201900012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ChemistryOpen        ISSN: 2191-1363            Impact factor:   2.911


Introduction

The sensitization luminescence of lanthanide ions by chromophores has been widely applied in developing various functional systems such as luminescent probes for medical diagnosis, phosphors of LEDs, photochemical supramolecular devices, light conversion agents of solar cells or plant growth regulation, and luminescent thermometers.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 The necessity of a chromophore to transfer absorbed light energy to the luminescent states of lanthanide ions is due to the forbidden characteristic of 4f–4f electronic transitions. The sensitization mechanism or excitation energy transfer (EET)pathway of lanthanide luminescence complexes is a fundamental issue dealing with the reasonable design and understanding of antenna‐ligand molecular structures for the various applications. In most investigated lanthanide complexes, the triplet states of antenna ligands dominate the excitation energy transfer in the sensitization luminescence of lanthanide ions (triplet pathway).9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 while the direct experimental evidence for the singlet EET pathway in the lanthanide sensitization luminescence (singlet pathway), which does not involve the triplet states of antenna ligands, had been very limited, although it was proposed by Kleinerman15 in 1966 and supported by some indirect evidences.16,17 The singlet energy‐transfer pathway was first demonstrated in our groups by excited‐state dynamics experiments of a EuIII complex [Eu(tta)3dpbt] (dpbt, 2‐(N,N‐diethylanilin‐4‐yl)‐4,6‐bis(3,5‐dimethylpyrazol‐1‐yl)‐1,3,5‐triazine; tta, thenoyltrifluoroacetonate), in which the excitation state of S1(dpbt) exhibits an obvious feature of charge transfer.18,19 After that more europium luminescent complexes capable of being sensitized by singlet intra‐ligand charge transfer states were reported.20, 21, 22 Due to the avoidance of energetic constraint from the dpbt T1 state, the singlet pathway endows [Eu(tta)3dpbt] and its analog [Eu(tta)3bpt] (bpt, 2‐(N,N‐diethylanilin‐4‐yl)‐4,6‐bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)‐1,3,5‐triazine) with efficient EuIII luminescence under one‐photo excitation in visible region or two‐photon excitation in near‐infrared (NIR) region,19,23,24 which has been applied in studying the tumor‐targeting dynamics of nanocarriers in living animals using a home‐built two‐photon excitation time‐resolved imaging system.3 Our previously reported experimental evidences for the singlet pathway involved the well matched lifetime of the singlet state of dpbt in [Eu(tta)3dpbt] at 430 nm (1.3 ns) and the rise time constant of 5D1(EuIII) emission at 585 nm (1.8 ns), as well as a large difference between the lifetimes of 5D0(EuIII) (0.48 ms) and T1(dpbt) state (3.9 s).18 It should be mentioned that in the observed singlet pathway, some intermediate states such as a ligand‐to‐metal charge transfer singlet state (LMCT)25 may play an important role in the dpbt‐to‐EuIII energy transfer processes, but T1(dpbt) is not involved. A further investigation on the energy migration processes among the excitation states of different ligands in a dpbt‐sensitized EuIII luminescence complex is helpful to demonstrate the dominant role of the singlet EET pathway.8 However, the experimental analysis on such energy migration processes has not been reported yet. In this work, the energy migration processes between the different ligands and the contribution of singlet EET pathways to EuIII luminescence in a highly luminescent complex [Eu(fod)3dpbt] (Scheme 1, fod, 6,6,7,7,8,8,8‐heptafluoro‐ 2,2‐dimethyl‐3,5‐octanedione), in which dpbt and fod exhibit well separated fluorescence excitation and phosphorescence bands, were investigated by time‐resolved luminescence spectroscopy and excitation state dynamics analysis. It was demonstrated that upon the excitation of dpbt in [Eu(fod)3dpbt], the singlet pathway dominated the sensitization of EuIII luminescence, while the energy migration from T1(dpbt) to T1(fod) was inactive and the EET pathway of T1(dpbt)→EuIII luminescence states was inefficient. (Figure 1). In addition, it is interesting to find that the singlet EET pathway also existed upon the excitation of fod in [Eu(fod)3dpbt] besides the triplet EET pathway involving T1(fod).
Scheme 1

Chemical structure of [Eu(fod)3dpbt].

Figure 1

The energy‐transfer pathway in the dpbt‐sensitized luminescence of EuIII in [Eu(fod)3dpbt].

Chemical structure of [Eu(fod)3dpbt]. The energy‐transfer pathway in the dpbt‐sensitized luminescence of EuIII in [Eu(fod)3dpbt].

Results and Discussion

Luminescence Properties and the Singlet Pathway in [Eu(fod)3dpbt]

Figure 2 shows the normalized UV‐vis absorption, EuIII luminescence excitation and emission spectra of [Eu(fod)3dpbt] at 298 K. The two excitation bands at 295 and 405 nm can be attributed to the sensitization function of fod and dpbt, respectively. The absorption band at 405 nm of coordinated dpbt is in consistent with the EuIII luminescence excitation spectrum in the visible light region, while the absorption signal below 350 nm is derived from the absorption band tail of fod. The absolute quantum yield for EuIII luminescence in [Eu(fod)3dpbt] upon excitation at 410 nm at 298 K was measured to be 0.59, which was much higher than that of [Eu(tta)3dpbt] (0.45). The lifetime of 5D0(EuIII) state in [Eu(fod)3dpbt], emitting at 614 nm, was measured to be 684 μs at 298 K, which was longer than that in [Eu(tta)3dpbt] (480 μs), implying more efficient depression of the nonradiative deactivation of EuIII luminescent states by the replacement of tta with fod in the complex.
Figure 2

The normalized UV/Vis absorption spectrum (black solid line), EuIII luminescence excitation spectrum (blue dashed line, λ em=614 nm) and emission spectrum (red solid line, λ ex=405 nm) of [Eu(fod)3dpbt] in toluene (1×10−5  m) at 298 K.

The normalized UV/Vis absorption spectrum (black solid line), EuIII luminescence excitation spectrum (blue dashed line, λ em=614 nm) and emission spectrum (red solid line, λ ex=405 nm) of [Eu(fod)3dpbt] in toluene (1×10−5  m) at 298 K. As shown in Figure 3, when dpbt in [Eu(fod)3dpbt] was excited at 298 K, the fluorescence of dpbt at 430 nm exhibited a decay time constant of 1.7 ns that was very close to the luminescence rise time constant (1.8 ns) of EuIII at 585 nm derived from 5D1(EuIII)→7F3(EuIII) transition (see Figure S1 for the fitting results of the luminescence kinetic curves at 430 and 585 nm of [Eu(fod)3dpbt]). Moreover, the luminescence decay time constant (Figure 3b) of EuIII at 585 nm was 604 ns which was in the same level with the luminescence rise‐time constant of EuIII at 614 nm (582 ns, corresponding to 5D0(EuIII)→7F2(EuIII) transition).
Figure 3

The time‐resolved luminescence spectra and kinetics curves on different timescales of [Eu(fod)3dpbt] in toluene recorded at 298 K (1×10−4  m). a) Kinetics curves at 430 and 585 nm (λ ex = 400 nm), and the inset shows the luminescence spectra at different delay times. b) Kinetics curves at 585 and 614 nm (λ ex=416 nm).

The time‐resolved luminescence spectra and kinetics curves on different timescales of [Eu(fod)3dpbt] in toluene recorded at 298 K (1×10−4  m). a) Kinetics curves at 430 and 585 nm (λ ex = 400 nm), and the inset shows the luminescence spectra at different delay times. b) Kinetics curves at 585 and 614 nm (λ ex=416 nm). The inset of Figure 3a shows the dynamic luminescence spectra of [Eu(fod)3dpbt] within 10 ns. With the delay time increasing, the background of the fluorescence of dpbt in the complex gradually decreased and the luminescence signal at 585 nm of EuIII luminescence emerged (red dash line). Note that the luminescence rise‐time constant of EuIII luminescence at 614 nm was 582 ns, and the 5D0(EuIII) state had not been adequately populated within 10 ns, so the luminescence signal of EuIII luminescence at 614 nm in the illustration of Figure 3a was not obvious. The aforementioned tight decay‐to‐rise correlation clearly demonstrated the singlet EET pathway in the dpbt‐sensitized EuIII luminescence of [Eu(fod)3dpbt].

Time‐Resolved Phosphorescence Spectroscopy of [Eu(fod)3dpbt]

The phosphorescence spectra of dpbt and fod in [Eu(fod)3dpbt] at 77 K measured 0.5 ms after the photoexcitation of dpbt and fod, respectively, are shown in Figure 4. When fod in [Eu(fod)3dpbt] was excited at 295 nm (Figure 4a), besides the phosphorescence bands at 400, 428 nm of toluene,26,27 and the peak at 540 nm of 5D1→7F1 transition of EuIII, the phosphorescence band of T1(fod)→S0(fod) at 500 nm (20000 cm−1) was observed clearly. The phosphorescence decay at 500 nm could be well fitted by a bi‐exponential function with the time constants or lifetimes of 2.1 ms (39.3 %) and 16.5 ms (60.7 %), suggesting that there exist two kind of T1(fod) with different coordination environments in the compound. Upon the excitation at 295 nm at 77 K, the EuIII luminescence decay curve at 614 nm (Figure S2a) could be well fitted by a bi‐exponential function with the lifetimes of 826 μs (93.1 %) and 2.1 ms (6.9 %). The long lifetime of 5D0(EuIII) was well matching with the short lifetime of T1(fod) (2.1 ms), suggesting the existence of EET from T1(fod) to the EuIII luminescence states upon the excitation of fod, while the short lifetime of 5D0(EuIII) was the characteristic decay constant for the deactivation process of EuIII in [Eu(fod)3dpbt]. Moreover, the shape of the phosphorescence spectrum at 500 nm changed with delay time increasing, which may be induced by the presence of phosphorescence of the long‐lifetime T1(fod) and T1(dpbt).
Figure 4

Phosphorescence spectra of [Eu(fod)3dpbt] in toluene (5×10−4  m) at 77 K with different delay times. a) λ ex=295 nm, the inset shows phosphorescence intensity decay curve at 500 nm; b) λ ex=416 nm.

Phosphorescence spectra of [Eu(fod)3dpbt] in toluene (5×10−4  m) at 77 K with different delay times. a) λ ex=295 nm, the inset shows phosphorescence intensity decay curve at 500 nm; b) λ ex=416 nm. When dpbt in [Eu(fod)3dpbt] was excited at 416 nm (Figure 4b), the phosphorescence spectrum corresponding to T1(dpbt)→S0(dpbt) transition at 77 K exhibited a broad band with a maximum wavelength of 521 nm (19194 cm−1), and the decay curve of the phosphorescence intensity could be well fitted with a single exponential function with a time constant or lifetime of 3.3 s (Figure S3). The narrow emission bands at 591, 614, 650, 695 nm could be attributed to the EuIII luminescence signals. The phosphorescence signal of the ligand fod (at 500 nm) could not be observed in the phosphorescence spectrum of [Eu(fod)3dpbt] upon the excitation at 416 nm, which was in consistent with the fact that the energy level of T1(fod) was higher than that of T1(dpbt) by 806 cm−1, indicating that the energy migration process T1(dpbt)→T1(fod) hardly happened in [Eu(fod)3dpbt]. During the period from 0.5 ms to 9 ms after the photoexcitation, the luminescent intensity of 5D0(EuIII)→7F4(EuIII) transition at 695 nm decreased by 98.8 %, whereas the phosphorescence intensity of T1(dpbt)→S0 at 521 nm was nearly unchanged, indicating that T1(dpbt) was not the main energy donor for the sensitization of EuIII luminescence in [Eu(fod)3dpbt], and any energy transfer process started from T1(dpbt) was inefficient within 9 ms. A weak emission band at 614 nm of 5D0(EuIII)→7F2 (EuIII) was observed in the phosphorescence spectrum of [Eu(fod)3dpbt] measured 9 ms after the pulse excitation of dpbt at 416 nm. Since the EuIII luminescence at 614 nm derived from the singlet‐pathway sensitization has a lifetime of 963 μs as measured at 77 K (Figure S2b), its intensity would decay at least by one ten thousandth after 9 ms. The EuIII luminescence at 614 nm derived from the triplet‐pathway sensitization should have an apparent lifetime of 3.3 s (the same as that of T1(dpbt)) at 77 K, and its intensity would not decrease obviously within 9 ms. Therefore, the contribution to EuIII luminescence from the triplet energy transfer pathway could be roughly estimated to be less than 2 % (see supporting information), implying that the population of T1(dpbt) state is inefficient for loosening the forbidden rule of f‐f transition of EuIII in [Eu(fod)3dpbt]. It should be mentioned that, compared with the case at room temperature, the much longer lifetime of T1(dpbt) at 77 K enhanced the contribution of triplet EET pathway to the sensitization luminescence of EuIII. Furthermore, it was found that when fod in [Eu(fod)3dpbt] was excited at 298 K, the fluorescence of dpbt at 430 nm appeared clearly (Figure 5), which may be derived from the Förster resonance energy transfer from fod to dpbt, implying that the singlet EET process for the sensitized luminescence of EuIII in [Eu(fod)3dpbt] also existed upon the excitation of fod and excitation energy migration. Such a unique sensitization manner and the excellent luminescent properties make [Eu(fod)3dpbt] to be a promising luminescence dye in the analysis based on photoinduced luminescence.28,29
Figure 5

Luminescence spectrum of [Eu(fod)3dpbt] in toluene (1×10−5  m) at 298 K under the excitation at 295 nm.

Luminescence spectrum of [Eu(fod)3dpbt] in toluene (1×10−5  m) at 298 K under the excitation at 295 nm.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the energy migration processes between the different ligands and the EET pathways for EuIII sensitization luminescence in a highly luminescent complex [Eu(fod)3dpbt] were investigated. The obtained data including the well matched fluorescence lifetime of dpbt at 430 nm and the luminescence rising time constant of 5D1(EuIII)→7F3(EuIII) transition at 585 nm, the relationships among the lifetimes of T1(dpbt), T1(fod), 5D0(EuIII), as well as the phosphorescence spectra measured with different delay times clearly revealed that the singlet EET pathway dominate the sensitization luminescence of EuIII contribution of more than 98 % at 77 K upon the excitation of dpbt. It was found that the energy migration from T1(dpbt) to T1(fod) hardly happened in [Eu(fod)3dpbt] under excitation of dpbt, while upon the excitation of fod, there was a singlet EET process for the sensitization of EuIII luminescence including the energy migration from S1(fod) to S1(dpbt), in addition to the triplet EET pathway.

Experimental Section

The dpbt ligand and the [Eu(fod)3dpbt] complex were synthesized according to the previously reported methods.18,30 In a typical experiment for preparing [Eu(fod)3dpbt], a solution of Eu(fod)3⋅3H2O (103.8 mg, 0.1 mm) in benzene (10 mL) was added to a solution of dpbt (41.6 mg, 0.1 mm) in benzene (10 mL) under argon, and the mixture was stirred for 3 h to give a yellow solution with bright red luminescence in daylight. 1H NMR (C6D6, 400 MHz, 298 K, TMS): δ=30.553 (s, 6H; Pz‐CH3), 13.073 (s, 2H; Pz−H), 7.557 (d, 3J(H,H)=9.0 Hz, 2H; Ph−H), 6.059 (d, 3J(H,H)=8.9 Hz, 2H; Ph−H), 4.673 (s, 6H; Pz‐CH3), 2.687 (q, 3J(H,H)=7.4 Hz, 4H; NCH2CH3), 0.636 (t, 3J(H,H)=7.0 Hz, 6H; NCH2CH3) 0.153 (s, 27 H; C‐CH3), −1.567 (s, 3H; CH) ppm. EI MS: m/z: 1157.3 ([M‐fod]+). Elemental analysis (EuC53H58N8F21O6): found C 43.55, H 3.97, N 7.70; calc. C 43.78, H 4.02, N 7.71. The steady state photoluminescence spectra of the complexes were measured on a fluorescence lifetime and steady state spectrometer (FLS 980, Edinburgh Instruments) equipped with an Oxford Optistat DN2 cryostat and a PMT detector. In the phosphorescence spectra measurements on FLS 980, the delay time (time interval between the excitation pulse and spectrum measurement) could be adjusted in a range from 5 μs to 9.0 ms with an exposure time of 1 ms. A quartz cuvette with an optical path length of 1 cm was used in the measurements. Absolute quantum yields of [Eu(fod)3dpbt] were measured on an Hamamatsu Photonics C9920‐02 absolute quantum yield spectrometer, which is more accurate than the quantum yields measured by relative method. UV‐Vis absorption spectrum was recorded on a UV3600 PLUS spectrophotometer in a 1 cm quartz cell. The luminescence lifetimes at microsecond and second timescale were measured on a Horiba Jobinyvon Deltaflex UltraFast lifetime Spectrofluorometer. The kinetics curves of the EuIII luminescence at 585 nm and the fluorescence of dpbt at 430 nm in [Eu(fod)3dpbt] upon the excitation at 400 nm were recorded with a high‐resolution streak camera system (Hamamatsu C10910). We used an amplified mode‐lock Ti: Sapphire femtosecond laser system (Legend, Coherent) to generate the pump beam with a repetition rate of 1 KHz. The samples were excited by the 400 nm laser, which was generated by the 800 nm pulsed laser passing through a frequency‐doubling BBO crystal with an incident angle of ca. 45°. The luminescence lifetime of μs timescale (Figure 3b) was measured on a digital oscilloscope (bandwidth 600 MHz; LeCroy WaveSurfer 64Xs, Chestnut Ridge). The excitation pulses (0.25 mJ/pulse for 416 nm, 7 ns, 10 Hz) were obtained with a hydrogen‐charged Raman shifter (4 MPa) which was pumped by the third harmonics of a Nd:YAG laser (355 nm, 10 Hz, 70 mJ/pulse, Quanta‐Ray Pro‐Series, Spectra Physics Lasers Inc.). The luminescent light was sent to a spectrograph (SP2500i, Princeton Instruments, USA), and the signal output was fed to the digital oscilloscope. The time evolution profiles at selected wavelengths were fitted to single or multiple exponential decay functions to derive the decay time constants or lifetimes. The kinetics data was fitted by mathematical functions with Origin 8.5 and Matlab 5.2.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supplementary Click here for additional data file.
  19 in total

1.  Establishing the molecular basis for molecular electronics.

Authors:  Ronald A Wassel; Christopher B Gorman
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2004-10-04       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Purely heterometallic lanthanide(III) macrocycles through controlled assembly of disulfide bonds for dual color emission.

Authors:  David J Lewis; Peter B Glover; Melissa C Solomons; Zoe Pikramenou
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Energy Resonance Crossing Controls the Photoluminescence of Europium Antenna Probes.

Authors:  Qiangqiang Zhang; Liangliang Wu; Xiaoyan Cao; Xuebo Chen; Weihai Fang; Michael Dolg
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Role of ligand-to-metal charge transfer state in nontriplet photosensitization of luminescent europium complex.

Authors:  Li-Min Fu; Xi-Cheng Ai; Man-Yu Li; Xiao-Fan Wen; Rui Hao; Yi-Shi Wu; Yuan Wang; Jian-Ping Zhang
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.781

5.  Lanthanide ions as spectral converters for solar cells.

Authors:  Bryan M van der Ende; Linda Aarts; Andries Meijerink
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 3.676

6.  Perfluorinated aromatic spacers for sensitizing europium(III) centers in dinuclear oligomers: better than the best by chemical design?

Authors:  Jean-François Lemonnier; Lucille Babel; Laure Guénée; Prasun Mukherjee; David H Waldeck; Svetlana V Eliseeva; Stéphane Petoud; Claude Piguet
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Efficient sensitization of europium, ytterbium, and neodymium functionalized tris-dipicolinate lanthanide complexes through tunable charge-transfer excited states.

Authors:  Anthony D'Aléo; Alexandre Picot; Andrew Beeby; J A Gareth Williams; Boris Le Guennic; Chantal Andraud; Olivier Maury
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 5.165

8.  Anion Binding Properties of Alkynylplatinum(II) Complexes with Amide-Functionalized Terpyridine: Host-Guest Interactions and Fluoride Ion-Induced Deprotonation.

Authors:  Margaret Ching-Lam Yeung; Ben Wai-Kin Chu; Vivian Wing-Wah Yam
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 2.911

9.  Enabling the Triplet of Tetraphenylethene to Sensitize the Excited State of Europium(III) for Protein Detection and Time-Resolved Luminescence Imaging.

Authors:  Zece Zhu; Bo Song; Jingli Yuan; Chuluo Yang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 16.806

10.  Excitation Energy-Transfer Processes in the Sensitization Luminescence of Europium in a Highly Luminescent Complex.

Authors:  Yan-Jie Huang; Can Ke; Li-Min Fu; Yu Li; Shu-Feng Wang; Ying-Chao Ma; Jan-Ping Zhang; Yuan Wang
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.911

View more
  1 in total

1.  Excitation Energy-Transfer Processes in the Sensitization Luminescence of Europium in a Highly Luminescent Complex.

Authors:  Yan-Jie Huang; Can Ke; Li-Min Fu; Yu Li; Shu-Feng Wang; Ying-Chao Ma; Jan-Ping Zhang; Yuan Wang
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.911

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.