Literature DB >> 30973207

A randomized controlled trial on the blood pressure-lowering effect of amlodipine and nifedipine-GITS in sustained hypertension.

Qi-Fang Huang1, Chang-Sheng Sheng1, Yan Li1, Yu Dou2, Mei-Sheng Zheng3, Zhi-Ming Zhu4, Ji-Guang Wang1.   

Abstract

In a multicenter, randomized trial, we investigated whether the long half-time dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker amlodipine was more efficacious than the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation of nifedipine in lowering ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in sustained hypertension (clinic systolic/diastolic BP 140-179/90-109 mm Hg and 24-hour systolic/diastolic BP ≥ 130/80 mm Hg). Eligible patients were randomly assigned to amlodipine 5-10 mg/day or nifedipine-GITS 30-60 mg/day. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed for 24 hours at baseline and 4-week treatment and for 48 hours at 8-week treatment with a dose of medication missed on the second day. After 8-week treatment, BP was similarly reduced in the amlodipine (n = 257) and nifedipine-GITS groups (n = 248) for both clinic and ambulatory (24-hour systolic/diastolic BP 10.3/6.5 vs 10.9/6.3 mm Hg, P ≥ 0.24) measurements. However, after missing a dose of medication, ambulatory BP reductions were greater in the amlodipine than nifedipine-GITS group, with a significant (P ≤ 0.04) between-group difference in 24-hour (-1.2 mm Hg) and daytime diastolic BP (-1.5 mm Hg). In conclusion, amlodipine and nifedipine-GITS were efficacious in reducing 24-hour BP. When a dose of medication was missed, amlodipine became more efficacious than nifedipine-GITS. ©2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory blood pressure; amlodipine; dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker; hypertension; nifedipine-GITS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30973207      PMCID: PMC8030393          DOI: 10.1111/jch.13543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  27 in total

1.  Persistence of antihypertensive efficacy after missed doses: comparison of amlodipine and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system.

Authors:  Henry L Elliott; Mamoun Elawad; Robert Wilkinson; Shyam P Singh
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  A comparative crossover evaluation of amlodipine and nifedipine GITS before and after a missed dose: 48-h blood pressure profiles.

Authors:  Naomi Nussinovitch; Gilad Rosenberg; Edna Peleg; Talma Rosenthal
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 3.  Association of a difference in systolic blood pressure between arms with vascular disease and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Rod S Taylor; Angela C Shore; Obioha C Ukoumunne; John L Campbell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Effect of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination versus nifedipine GITS on ambulatory blood pressure and sympathetic activation.

Authors:  Roberto Fogari; Paola Preti; Annalisa Zoppi; Luca Corradi; Carlo Pasotti; Andrea Rinaldi; Amedeo Mugellini
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Comparison of bisoprolol to a metoprolol CR/ZOK tablet for control of heart rate and blood pressure in mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients: the CREATIVE study.

Authors:  Tianlun Yang; Yinong Jiang; Yuming Hao; Shuxian Zhou; Xinjuan Xu; Baiming Qu; Xue Lin; Tianrong Ma
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.872

6.  [2010 Chinese guidelines for the management of hypertension].

Authors:  Li-Sheng Liu
Journal:  Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi       Date:  2011-07

Review 7.  The nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS). Evaluation of pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacological properties.

Authors:  J S Grundy; R T Foster
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of amlodipine.

Authors:  D R Abernethy
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.869

9.  Chronotherapy with nifedipine GITS in hypertensive patients: improved efficacy and safety with bedtime dosing.

Authors:  Ramón C Hermida; Diana E Ayala; Artemio Mojón; José R Fernández
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.689

10.  Reduction of morning blood pressure surge after treatment with nifedipine GITS at bedtime, but not upon awakening, in essential hypertension.

Authors:  Ramón C Hermida; Diana E Ayala; Artemio Mojón; Ignacio Alonso; José R Fernández
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.444

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparative efficacy of generic nifedipine versus brand-name amlodipine for hypertension management in Taiwan.

Authors:  Hao-Wei Lee; Chin-Chou Huang; Hsin-Bang Leu; Yenn-Jiang Lin
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.885

2.  A randomized controlled trial on the blood pressure-lowering effect of amlodipine and nifedipine-GITS in sustained hypertension.

Authors:  Qi-Fang Huang; Chang-Sheng Sheng; Yan Li; Yu Dou; Mei-Sheng Zheng; Zhi-Ming Zhu; Ji-Guang Wang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 3.  Application of metabolomics in the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the treatment of traditional Chinese medicine.

Authors:  Mingmei Shao; Yifei Lu; Hongjiao Xiang; Junmin Wang; Guang Ji; Tao Wu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 5.988

4.  Evaluation of commonly used cardiovascular drugs in inhibiting vonoprazan metabolism in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Yiran Wang; Jihua Shi; Dapeng Dai; Jianping Cai; Shuanghu Wang; Yun Hong; Shan Zhou; Fangling Zhao; Quan Zhou; Peiwu Geng; Yunfang Zhou; Xue Xu; Qingfeng Luo
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 5.988

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.